On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/15/2011 05:03 AM, Markku Rontu wrote: >> >> Named return values, ah the dream of symmetry. > > I think my mad-scientist advisor did something like this once. I think it > would be awesome to have this, and of course keyword arguments, as > first-class constructs in Racket.
What would be the advantage of having keyword arguments implemented the `compile' step, as opposed to implemented in the `expand' step as they are now? -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
