Cool! Interested in releasing a driver for it on planet?
Does MysterX work with Mono in Linux/Mac?
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
> P.S. Just roughly, for eample: https://gist.github.com/813783
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Greg Hendershott
> wrote:
> >> I'd be v
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2011, at 9:55 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
>
> > it should be to build satisfying video games are really worth fixing.
>
> Yes they are! Any helpful proposals are appreciated and have been acted on
> in the past.
>
Indeed. The Ra
On Feb 5, 2011, at 9:55 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> it should be to build satisfying video games are really worth fixing.
Yes they are! Any helpful proposals are appreciated and have been acted on in
the past.
(Perhaps I should start playing Scratch and Alice :-) )
> The key thing that I li
6 hours ago, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> > I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme function, but
> > I'm not quite sure how to do it.
>
> Just a quick, ransom tip: Multi line strings can be written
> conveniently with "here strings",
>
> #<
Hi,
having tested the program a bit further I noticed that it still behaves
differently than intended in two ways
1) Preferably the inputs could take the same format as if in separate files,
for example
(define script1
"
#!/usr/bin/expect
command 1
command 2
command 3
")
(define script2
7 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Once you get into "expect"-like interaction with a process using the
> three streams at once, and doing pattern-matching while also
> capturing the output, and doing this all efficiently, it's tricky.
> [...]
Dealing with the three streams and pattern matching o
P.S. Just roughly, for eample: https://gist.github.com/813783
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Greg Hendershott
wrote:
>> I'd be very happy if somebody found an ODBC connector gathering
>> dust in the corner.
>
> I've tried using Racket's mysterx to talk to ADO and it seemed to work OK.
>
> On Sun
> I'd be very happy if somebody found an ODBC connector gathering
> dust in the corner.
I've tried using Racket's mysterx to talk to ADO and it seemed to work OK.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:28:27 -0800
> Dave Yrueta wrote:
>
>> is there anyway
Great, thanks Thomas!
br, jukka
> -Original Message-
> From: thomas.ch...@googlemail.com [mailto:thomas.ch...@googlemail.com]On
> Behalf Of Thomas Chust
> Sent: 06 February 2011 22:37
> To: Jukka Tuominen
> Cc: users@racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket] Embedding multiline shell scipt
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:37:12 +0100
Thomas Chust wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen
> :
> > [...]
> > I slightly modified the Manfred's code to capture the output
> > [...]
>
> Hello,
>
> the code seems somewhat more complicated than necessary to me and it
> lacks some cleanup and error handling. I
2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> [...]
> I slightly modified the Manfred's code to capture the output
> [...]
Hello,
the code seems somewhat more complicated than necessary to me and it
lacks some cleanup and error handling. I would suggest to use the
available utilities from racket/port to simplify t
Hi all,
I slightly modified the Manfred's code to capture the output (see below). It
seems to do the job, but I haven't tried other cases yet or error handling,
but it's good to continue from here. Thanks Manfred!
Thank you everybody else, as well! I appreciate the shell scripting isn't
the opti
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:37:31 +0100
Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> > I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme
> > function, but I'm not quite sure how to do it.
>
> Just a quick, ransom tip: Multi line strings can be written
> conveniently with "here stri
Tip: When constructing a shell command line or script programmatically,
to be parsed by the shell, you have to be especially careful about
quoting and escaping of any values that you plug in. This is a likely
place for strange inputs to the construction to break the language,
resulting in fail
2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme function, but
> I'm not quite sure how to do it.
Just a quick, ransom tip: Multi line strings can be written
conveniently with "here strings",
#<
I am using the WebSocket server and having problems with connections
dropping unexpectedly. I am connecting from Chrome 10 (dev channel).
In the connection handler I register callbacks (which get asynchronously
called in other threads) and use ws-send! in them.
The callback looks like this:
#
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:14:42 +0100
Thomas Chust wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Manfred Lotz :
> > [...]
> > I don't know how to merge stdout and stderr in proper sequence.
> > [...]
>
> There is no such thing as proper sequencing of data flowing through
> different streams.
>
> Due to buffering in system lib
Thomas Chust wrote at 02/06/2011 10:14 AM:
2011/2/6 Manfred Lotz :
[...]
I don't know how to merge stdout and stderr in proper sequence.
[...]
There is no such thing as proper sequencing of data flowing through different
streams.
Due to buffering in system libraries and the operating
The script itself could be considered as a single block returning a single
output at the end.
I tried the code, and I think it's almost there. To test it, I just added
"ls" at the end of the sample script. It prints the directories and files
nicely, but I cannot capture them for further processin
2011/2/6 Manfred Lotz :
> [...]
> I don't know how to merge stdout and stderr in proper sequence.
> [...]
There is no such thing as proper sequencing of data flowing through
different streams.
Due to buffering in system libraries and the operating system kernel
it is also entirely impossible to r
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:06:19 +0200
"Jukka Tuominen" wrote:
>
> So, once i have created the script within racket as multiline string,
> how do I actually run it within racket without writing or reading any
> external files, and capture the output of the script for further
> processing (also in rac
2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> [...]
> One more requirement that I forget to mention is that it should also
> be possible to handle "expect" type of "automated conversations".
> [...]
Hello,
if you want I/O redirection, you should, for example, use the
procedure process [1] instead of system.
> [..
So, once i have created the script within racket as multiline string, how do
I actually run it within racket without writing or reading any external
files, and capture the output of the script for further processing (also in
racket).
In other words, I could write the script into a file and run it
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:12:49 +0200
"Jukka Tuominen"
wrote:
>
> Thanks Manfred and Thomas,
>
> I'm just about to try these. One more requirement that I forget to
> mention is that it should also be possible to handle "expect" type of
> "automated conversations". You can pass several independent c
(I see you answered this and I just missed the message before sending
mine. Sorry for the noise.)
Robby
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I've pushed a change that makes place-image/align not insist on the
> second image argument having a pinhole. That was too much checking.
I've pushed a change that makes place-image/align not insist on the
second image argument having a pinhole. That was too much checking.
Does that help?
Robby
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> In playing around with image.ss, I've run into the following problem: the
> center
Thanks Manfred and Thomas,
I'm just about to try these. One more requirement that I forget to mention
is that it should also be possible to handle "expect" type of "automated
conversations". You can pass several independent commands with system/output
without problem, but I had difficulties in fi
On Feb 5, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> Sorry for the noise: I think I answered my own question. You basically stick
> a pinhole in the image you want to place at its desired center
Yes, the "desired center" is sometimes tricky. In particular, what one
probably means by the "cente
2011/2/6 Jukka Tuominen :
> [...]
> I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme function, but
> I'm not quite sure how to do it.
> [...]
I just tried it and the procedure system [1] seems to have no problems
executing multiline scripts passed to it.
Ciao,
Thomas
[1]
http://docs
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 11:26:40 +0200
"Jukka Tuominen"
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme function,
> but I'm not quite sure how to do it.
>
> With multiline shell scripts I mean the scripts that are usually
> saved as separate files containing for e
Hi all,
I'm trying to embed multiline shell scripts within a scheme function, but
I'm not quite sure how to do it.
With multiline shell scripts I mean the scripts that are usually saved as
separate files containing for example:
---
#!/bin/sh
while home
do
...
done
---
I want to be able to con
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:28:27 -0800
Dave Yrueta wrote:
> is there anyway
> to write MS SQL Server scripts in Racket that work in a MS SQL server
> environment?
Hi Dave,
creating SQL scripts is just a matter of building the right string
for the job at hand. If nobody comes up with a smarter idea,
32 matches
Mail list logo
