Re: [R-sig-Debian] arm64 r-base backports on CRAN

Hi Johannes, On 29 June 2025 at 22:28, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2025, 20:20:42 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > Hi Johannes, | > | > ( And sorry about the fat-finger typo in the earlier email butchering your | > name. | | No worries! Happens

Re: [R-sig-Debian] arm64 r-base backports on CRAN

Hi Johannes, ( And sorry about the fat-finger typo in the earlier email butchering your name. I really need to get proof-reading emails before sending... ) On 24 June 2025 at 20:02, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 7:55 PM Johannes Ranke wrote: | > | > Hey Jeroen, | > | > I was rec

Re: [R-sig-Debian] arm64 r-base backports on CRAN

On 24 June 2025 at 15:41, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | Would it be possible to add arm64 binaries for the r-base backports on | https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian and/or perhaps update the | readme a bit about what is available? That part is maintained by Johanned so you need to talk to him.

Re: [R-sig-Debian] GPG key for Debian repository

On 17 June 2025 at 02:23, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: | This is a freshly installed Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W. `gpg` and `dirmngr` are installed. I also tried it in a `bookworm` Docker container and I'm getting the same error. | | The web page for the keyserver shows that it's there. | | http

Re: [R-sig-Debian] GPG key for Debian repository

(Editing your email from the unreadable vertical format popular with some) On 17 June 2025 at 01:45, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: | Has the key changed? According to https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/linux/debian/ I should be able to get a key via | | $ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --rec

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Updating to R 4.5.1 on Ubuntu Plucky

Simone, On 16 June 2025 at 04:36, Simone Blomberg wrote: | Two steps: | | sudo curl -fsSL https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/ | marutter_pubkey.asc | gpg --dearmor | sudo tee /etc/apt/keyrings/cran.gpg > / | dev/null | | This downloads the key, turns it in to a binary in the correct

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Updating to R 4.5.1 on Ubuntu Plucky

Hi Simone, On 16 June 2025 at 03:45, Simone Blomberg wrote: | Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it! I followed the instructions for | installation that are on CRAN. It may be just that Michael hasn't updated the | .deb packages yet. I'll wait and see. The handling of the apt sources list

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Updating to R 4.5.1 on Ubuntu Plucky

On 15 June 2025 at 23:45, Simone Blomberg via R-SIG-Debian wrote: | When I do apt update I get the following output: | | simoneb@laptop:~$ sudo apt update | Hit:1 https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu noble-cran40/ InRelease [...] | Notice: Missing Signed-By in the sources.list(5) entry f

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

PS The thing that _may_ appear counter intuitive is that `install.packages()` will (when r2u / bspm are NOT involved) install into the first location in .libPaths(). But with bspm this becomes a _pre-made binary_ from r2u and its paths for packages are hard-coded to /usr/lib/R/site-library. Onc

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

t us... Dirk, still traveling | Thanks, Ravi | | On Saturday, 17 May 2025 at 22:20:31 CEST, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | | | | On 17 May 2025 at 20:07, ravi wrote: | | Ivan and Dirk, | | Finally, finally, your mojo works! | | 1. I followed Ivan's suggestion. I ran bspm::enable

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

a slight overcount. For the count of 'only r2u' check the website, I post and update the numbers here. | Thanks to you, Ivan. Thanks, Dirk, for your patient help. Congratulations to you for persevering. I hope you enjoy r2u going forward. Dirk | Cheers, Ravi | | On Saturday

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

On 17 May 2025 at 21:18, Ivan Krylov via R-SIG-Debian wrote: | В Sat, 17 May 2025 17:17:09 + (UTC) | ravi via R-SIG-Debian пишет: | | > 7. Anyway, the bspm package has now been installed in | > /usr/local/lib/R/site-library. No namespace error is returned. | | Try running bspm::enable() in

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

On 17 May 2025 at 17:17, ravi wrote: | How can I test for this? I am sorry but I am now at the end of my rope. I provide installation instruction that have worked for many people, and countless installation (including countless automated ones). I recommend you try and play - inside a Docker c

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

t you do (most likely) have the command to load in /etc/R/Rprofile.site. Comment out the line 'bspm::enable()' and try again. Dirk | The strange thing is that, in of my previous attempts, I I did get bspm installed in one of the site-library locations. For some reason, I did not succ

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

t a fact of live. So please run the remaining steps of the script as root (or via sudo) and ensure that bash used. Cheers, Dirk | Thanks, Ravi | | | | On Saturday, 17 May 2025 at 10:11:26 CEST, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | | | | | | Ravi, | | On 16 May 2025 at 17:07, ravi via R-SIG-

Re: [R-sig-Debian] how to install R 4.4

metrics = "accuracy") | | | history <- model %>% fit( Xp, yp, epochs = 20, batch_size = 512, | validation_data = list(Xv, yv) | ) | ``` | | On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 17:20 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > > | > > Stephen, | > > | > > Sorry to hear that. I am

Re: [R-sig-Debian] getting started with r2u

Ravi, On 16 May 2025 at 17:07, ravi via R-SIG-Debian wrote: | I decided to run the add_cranapt_noble.sh script again. I see the following now: | |   | | ravi@ravi-P15xEMx:~$ sudo chmod +x /home/ravi/Downloads You use sudo here. | ravi@ravi-P15xEMx:~/Downloads$ cd /home/ravi/Downloads | |

Re: [R-sig-Debian] how to install R 4.4

Stephen, Sorry to hear that. I am not sure that hijacking an existing thread here is the best idea -- this is now also deep into reticulate territory, will depend on how you run Python on the box and more. For what it is worth, still works here > library("keras") > library("tensorflow"

Re: [R-sig-Debian] how to install R 4.4

On 14 May 2025 at 09:12, Stephen Bond wrote: | I do not care about version. My packages are in | | /home/stephen/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.4/ | | and and after renaming the 4.4 folder I can load them. | How do you avoid the version naming of the package folder? It's a personal preferenc

Re: [R-sig-Debian] how to install R 4.4

On 13 May 2025 at 18:32, Stephen Bond via R-SIG-Debian wrote: | is there a way to get R 4.4 on linux mint with ubuntu 24.04? | | I allowed upgrade of packages and that overwrote my 4.4 with 4.5 and | now i have a huge list of packages, some of which are difficult to | install to deal with. Well

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Installing R-4.3.3 on Debian 12

On 18 March 2025 at 09:38, Media Device wrote: | What is the recommended way to get R 4.3.3 on Debian 12? I noticed it | doesn't exist on the `bookworm-cran40` anymore. Should I install from | sources? If you think you need a version that is by now outdated (as 4.4.* is current, and 4.5.* will a

Re: [R-sig-Debian] i can’t install R

On 9 March 2025 at 22:57, Giorgia Porzio wrote: | Hello, i can’t install R and R studios on my chromebook 314 even after | downloading linux. | how can i solve this problem? We would need more information to be able to offer help to you. Here are some sample questions to get you started: - wha

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Problem with R package while building KDEStateMachineEditor

Hi Sylvain, Thanks for posting here (even if this is more of a CMake than a Debian question ...). On 13 January 2025 at 19:27, Sylvain Sécherre via R-SIG-Debian wrote: | Hello everyone! | | I have a big problem that takes me mad since 3 days... | | I try to build KDEStateMachineEditor with cm

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R3.4 on Debian12

Also, which compiler is this now? Maybe it is more stringent than the one we used when R 3.4.* was current? For Debian, you always have its own version of the wayback machine, namely https://snapshot.debian.org/ (which can be slow to respond because the breadth and depth whatever page you

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R Package: 'ggbreak' in Dockerfile

Lauren, On 15 October 2024 at 13:51, Gerber, Lauren J wrote: | I just tried fixing my script and added library(BiocManager) before library | (ggbreak), then rebuilt the image, and am still getting the same error. You need _two_ distinct commands. First install.packages("BiocManager") and

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R Package: 'ggbreak' in Dockerfile

On 15 October 2024 at 13:21, James W. MacDonald wrote: | Don't you have to load BiocManager before using it? Correct. The most minimal 'proof' I can offer is that after docker run --rm -ti rocker/r2u:noble the one line 'two-command' wrapping both R CMD INSTALL for BiocManager plus calling B

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

Lauren, I am now back home where looking into these things is a little easier. From your first email to me, I started off with the selenium container you mentioned as your starting point. And that basically is your issue. It is a 'high-level' container, and it sets a user. (Essentially) all oth

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

On 8 July 2024 at 21:01, marcoblanche...@icloud.com wrote: | No sure why you’re doubting me but if one would like the minimal Dockerfile | following the CRAN recommendations at https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ | ubuntu/, one would simply do I am aware. I co-wrote those instructions. The Do

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

On 8 July 2024 at 19:32, marcoblanche...@icloud.com wrote: | Oh, again, sorry for the spam but the problem Lauren is seeing is when she is | trying to sign the key. Installing gnugpg usually takes care of that problem. I am not sure about that. For jammy, my current (and used) rocker/r2u:jammy

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

On 8 July 2024 at 19:21, marcoblanche...@icloud.com wrote: | Hmm? It’s picking up the pre-made binary from ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0 using My bad. Your wording (and I quote) "Dockerfile I use to build r-base" mislead me as I read "build" as opposed to "install". Anyway, many of us have such Do

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

On 8 July 2024 at 16:37, marcoblanche...@icloud.com wrote: | Lauren, here’s my Dockerfile I use to build r-base from the repos, it builds on both Arm64 (Mac with Apple M2 chip) and Amd64 (AWS m5.4xlarge instance running Ubuntu 24.04). I rebuilt the docker image this morning and it builds fine

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issues with Ubuntu 22.04 and Installing the Latest Version of R (R 4.4.1) to Docker Image

Lauren, Glad you made it over here. I am still 'away' but will be back soon at which point I can re-run the sample scripts I use all the time for r2u setups on Ubuntu (part of which involves getting R itself). >From your previous email (to me) I gathered that one issue may be the signing key, h

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Issue with pkgconf when upgrading to 4.4.1

pay on these deltas. Thanks for reporting it though. These things can only be improved if we're aware. Dirk [1] The corresponding debian/changelog was r-base (4.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: Add libdeflate-dev to Depends of r-base-dev (Closes: #1069842) * debia

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Default CXXFLAGS

On 21 May 2024 at 15:59, Ivan Krylov wrote: | On Tue, 21 May 2024 14:48:48 +0200 | Kurt Hornik wrote: | | > I guess foer the CXXFLAGS we want dpkg-buildflags --get CXXFLAGS? Good catch, and expansion, by both of you. | It must be the case. It's both the documented option [1] and it | currentl

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Default CXXFLAGS

On 21 May 2024 at 13:01, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | Compiling packages with C++ code using the default r-base-dev | configuration on debian:sid shows a lot of: | |cc1plus: warning: '-Werror=' argument | '-Werror=implicit-function-declaration' is not valid for C++ | | Can this flag be removed from

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Problem Installing R 4.3.3 on Vanilla based Jammy Ubuntu

Marco, It usually helps to be aware of one's hardware platform ;-) There is an option for Docker command to tell it to switch to x86_64, my colleagues who are on M1 and alike use that to access the generally richer eco-system of binaries for the Intel world. If on the other hand you prefer to f

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Error building and installing with GCC ASAN in a Docker container

Hi Brent, On 15 February 2024 at 10:14, Brent G Ewing wrote: | Hi, | | I want to build a Docker container with R and various R packages built and | installed with the gcc address sanitizer enabled. I am working on a Debian | Bookworm system running on an x86_64 architecture. | | I start with t

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R

Hi, Can you please resend, but this time not in html format? The mailing list manager software swallows html; your email did not contain any plain text so there is nothing for us to read and (hopefully) help you with. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _

Re: [R-sig-Debian] SOLVED- Re: help installing R on Linux Mint 21.2

Luben, We all have different types of learning and how we approach this, let alone how we decompose things. With that, sorry you found this frustrating. Many of us put volunteer time into this trying to make things 'possible' and preferably 'easy' but we don't always get there. That said, I ha

Re: [R-sig-Debian] installing tydiverse on Linux Mint

Ivan, On 2 January 2024 at 10:15, Ivan Krylov wrote: | I've just read both scripts and I don't see them using sudo (the | comments say it has to be run as root). Have you edited the script? [...] | You need to find this line in /etc/apt/sources.list* and replace | victoria-cran40 with jammy-c

Re: [R-sig-Debian] installing tydiverse on Linux Mint

Luben, r2u instructions are at the site; there are two scripts for Ubuntu focal and jammy. I tested those repeatedly. Many people used them. We also support Docker installationsl; the docker images are also rebuilt frequently. r2u is also used around the clock on CI, likely most often 'from scr

[R-sig-Debian] SOLVED- Re: help installing R on Linux Mint 21.2

Luben, I am glad to hear you sorted it out. As far as I can tell there are two or three issues here: - you are on Mint which is not 'officially' support by posit (Debian/Ubuntu are) - the installation instructions have said for a decade+ to download the .deb and then install it with gdebi (

Re: [R-sig-Debian] custom built R will not change BLAS/LAPACK with update-alternatives

On 30 December 2023 at 23:49, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: | All is good. (Just for the sake of curiosity, and if you have the time: why did you find those incantations suspicious?) Memory is fuzzy and no ECC in my wetware :) but as I seem to recall it had to do with my fears over filenames not b

Re: [R-sig-Debian] custom built R will not change BLAS/LAPACK with update-alternatives

What blas/lapack -dev libraries do you installed when you build? I varied this over the two+ decades for the Debian build but any consistent pair of LAPACK and BLAS should work. From the aforementioned build log: Get: 150 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 libblas3 amd64 3.11.0-2 [1

Re: [R-sig-Debian] custom built R will not change BLAS/LAPACK with update-alternatives

On 30 December 2023 at 21:57, Ivan Krylov wrote: | On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 18:37:06 +0100 | Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: | | > configure: searching for an external BLAS | > configure: searching for BLAS in default libraries | > checking for dgemm_... no | > configure: searching for OpenBLAS | | The

Re: [R-sig-Debian] custom built R will not change BLAS/LAPACK with update-alternatives

If you match the exact build-deps I use and the exact options from debian/rules you should end up with the exact same output. As that is whay you desire but do not get we need to drill down into where it deviates. FWIW last time I build the Debian the (relevant) part (of the large) configure log

Re: [R-sig-Debian] [Rd] [R] Why Rprofile.site is not built with manual installation of R devel in linux?

On 10 November 2023 at 14:19, Martin Maechler wrote: | >> 2. In the installed R in /where/you/want/R/to/go, there is no even etc folder, there are only the folders bin, lib and share. That would appear to be an error in the locally installed R. What the package does has been discussed bef

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Error in ragg... Graphics API version mismatch

On 27 October 2023 at 13:00, Johan Andresen wrote: | I am sorry yet delighted to announce that the problem has been resolved. | ragg didn't install successfully in the first place. When it was, there was | no graphics API mismatch. Apologies for the spam; this entry may be | deleted. Johan Yes.

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

My thanks to Ivan for catching that it was of course a legit Ubuntu mirror, which I had missed. Can we (ever so briefly, no need for long posts) get back to the issue at hand: was there a package you wanted to install from r2u, but could not because of another repo or build infelicity. If so, t

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1? [branch about handling package collisions under Ubuntu/Debian]

Chris, This got a little long so I'll chop a few things down. On 22 August 2023 at 19:38, Chris Evans wrote: | On 16/08/2023 00:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > That can happen, and pinning can help. I would suggest to look at 'apt-cache | > polict nameofthepackagehe

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 4.3.1 [edited]?

Chris, I edited the README.md for r2u (also the main page at https://eddelbuettel.github.io/r2u) in a few places, that should hopefully address a few of the snafus you found. As for your question 'is r2u running R version x.y.z' there are few way to find out - if you have docker: docker run

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Is r2u at 3.4.1?

Hi Chris, Thanks for posting here, and sorry I missed it for two days due to sorting mailing list traffic into folders and clearly not glancing at all of them. On 13 August 2023 at 09:12, Chris Evans wrote: | I am putting this here as it may be of general and not just my own | interest.  I am

Re: [R-sig-Debian] pinning of binary r-cran-* packages from c2d4u / r2u on Ubuntu 22.04

On 9 August 2023 at 21:59, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: | On 09.08.2023 at 19:18 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > There is a fifth option I just realized. | > | > I use a variant of that to keep for example an old version of roxygen2 I | > prefer available. Recall that R packages a

Re: [R-sig-Debian] pinning of binary r-cran-* packages from c2d4u / r2u on Ubuntu 22.04

environemnt". On 9 August 2023 at 18:58, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: | Am 09.08.2023 um 18:17 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > Yes. If and when that happens, it is a bug! | | Not necessarily. Breaking code can also be due to an incompatible | feature update. We know that R has both, conservat

Re: [R-sig-Debian] pinning of binary r-cran-* packages from c2d4u / r2u on Ubuntu 22.04

Hi Thomas, Thanks a lot for bringing this over from r-package-devel! As for your question, "there is a lot of meat on these bones" and I really think we should discuss this here. Quick comments inline, more recap at the bottom. On 9 August 2023 at 17:29, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: | Hi, | | I am

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Ubuntu packages on s390x

On 4 August 2023 at 00:06, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:16 PM Vivian Kong wrote: | > | > Hello, | > | > Are there any plans to add R packages for Ubuntu on other architectures in addition to amd64? We are looking for s390x packages as the version from the distro's package man

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Ubuntu packages on s390x

Hi Vivian, On 3 August 2023 at 19:15, Vivian Kong wrote: | Are there any plans to add R packages for Ubuntu on other architectures in addition to amd64? We are looking for s390x packages as the version from the distro's package manger is 4.2.2. I'm happy to help in any way I can. Ok, now I

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 4.3.1 on Debian bullseye-cran40 repository

On 21 June 2023 at 07:48, Iago Giné Vázquez wrote: | Although R 4.3.1 has been released some days ago, and in http://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ it is claimed that | | | Debian bullseye has been released with R 4.0.4. If you want to upgrade to R 4.3.1 on bullseye, you can use the fo

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Fwd: package interflex

On 7 June 2023 at 08:37, Johan Andresen wrote: | I can understand why it changes the game. | | | It would be sweet if we could do something like r2u for Debian, but for now | we can't.  Switching between Debian and Ubuntu is not that onerous though. | | | Do you mind clarifying what

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Fwd: package interflex

On 7 June 2023 at 11:55, Johan Andresen wrote: | Btw Dirk, can I help package interflex for apt? Please be welcome to refer me | to guidelines/a manual for doing so if you can imagine it happening. Well I already replied to you saying that for me Rscript -e 'install.packages("interflex")' i

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Fwd: package interflex

On 6 June 2023 at 17:53, Richard Careaga wrote: | I was delighted I with how fast (faster than a tickled toddler giggles) r2u scarfed packages I. up my Pop!_OS (Ubuntu in party attire tuned for System76). But, despite 40 years as my own sys admin (classic fool for a client?), I bolluxed up, en

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Fwd: package interflex

this | interpretation. It would be sweet if we could do something like r2u for Debian, but for now we can't. Switching between Debian and Ubuntu is not that onerous though. Cheers, Dirk | Johan | | | | | Den tirs. 6. jun. 2023 kl. 19.58 skrev Dirk Eddelbuettel : | | | On 6 June 20

Re: [R-sig-Debian] why is KEYWORDS.db not in '/usr/lib/R/doc/' but in '/usr/share/R/doc/'?

On 6 June 2023 at 22:29, Johan Andresen wrote: | Thanks, Dirk and Ivan | | Now I better understand what is going on. Sweet this help is already in the | github issue. It's an issue somewhere between Laurent (for rpy2) and me (for the R package and his rpy2 on Debian) and we should be able to so

Re: [R-sig-Debian] package interflex

On 6 June 2023 at 19:37, Johan Andresen wrote: | I'd like input on how to install interflex | (note the instructions on its | github). It says install.packages("interflex") -- did you try that? | The installation failed on stable/bullseye, also when I

Re: [R-sig-Debian] why is KEYWORDS.db not in '/usr/lib/R/doc/' but in '/usr/share/R/doc/'?

Hi Johan, On 6 June 2023 at 18:55, Johan Andresen wrote: | Hi r-sig-debian, | | I feel lucky to have found out that `/doc/KEYWORDS.db` is in `/usr/share/R/`, | not in `usr/lib/R/` where rpy2 in python apparently looks for it when | trying to search help in R from the python environment. it retu

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Announcing r2u: 20k CRAN binaries for Ubuntu 22.04 + 20.04

On 26 March 2023 at 18:53, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 26 March 2023 at 18:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | Over the last few months I have provided multiple 'demos' as animated gifs | | showing how for example `system.time(install.package("tinyverse"))` installs | | al

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Announcing r2u: 20k CRAN binaries for Ubuntu 22.04 + 20.04

On 26 March 2023 at 18:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Over the last few months I have provided multiple 'demos' as animated gifs | showing how for example `system.time(install.package("tinyverse"))` installs | all these packages and all their dependencies in under twenty se

[R-sig-Debian] Announcing r2u: 20k CRAN binaries for Ubuntu 22.04 + 20.04

The r2u repository [1] has been providing CRAN packages as Ubuntu binaries (with *full* and *complete* dependency resolution) since last May. It is being served from a well-connect Internet2 mirror thanks to the University of Illinois making it *fast*. By relying on the bspm package [2], it can

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Font issue under X11() (Ubuntu 20.04)

On 23 August 2022 at 15:04, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) wrote: | Hi all, | | Using R under (X)ubuntu 20.04 here. I just noticed that the equal symbol (and other symbols like <>) are hanging kinda low under X11(). For example, if I run this code: | | plot(NA, xlim=c(0,2), ylim=c(0,2)) | text(1,

Re: [R-sig-Debian] How to open an access mdb using the rodbc package under Ubuntu 22.04

Postscriptum: We absolutely don't mind helping here, use on Ubuntu is *very much* on charter for r-sig-deb (which is, loosely, for help with any .deb-based OS and R). However, the question really had little to do with the OS and a lot with 'how do I do OBDC' which Ivan answered admirably. Next t

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Ubuntu Impish (21.10) repository complains about weak security information

On 16 May 2022 at 22:24, Lennart C. Karssen wrote: | Thanks Dirk, that gets me one step further. However, there is still a | hurdle. It seems that (at least at the time of writing) the | impish-cran40/ repo is broken. You are correct, sorry. I rushed earlier to help you on the key issue, and mis

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Segfault from c2d4u binary of RandomFields

On 8 January 2022 at 20:40, Ege Rubak wrote: | Hi everyone, | | For some time the GitHub Action of spatstat.core has been failing due | to a segfault when calling RandomFields (which calls RandomFieldsUtils | which may be causing the acutal segfault): | | https://github.com/spatstat/spatstat.c

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Open a text file with vi/vim in another Terminal

FYI, and as a follow-up, someone mentioned in a another thread utils::file.edit() (see https://rdrr.io/r/utils/file.edit.html) and the general rule still holds: "if it is generally useful, it probably already is in base R" ... Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e.

Re: [R-sig-Debian] [Solved]... was Cpp Error installing CRAN version of MatrixExtra on Ubuntu 18.04

On 20 December 2021 at 11:25, David Winsemius wrote: | Ran `update.packages()` again and found quite a few not-yet-updated | packages, many of them fairly essential, but NOT in the directory you | were worried about, but rather such as in '/usr/lib/R/site-library' and | '/usr/lib/R/library' [.

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Cpp Error installing CRAN version of MatrixExtra on Ubuntu 18.04

On 20 December 2021 at 15:48, Sebastian Meyer wrote: | Am 20.12.21 um 15:19 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | > | > On 19 December 2021 at 18:14, David Winsemius wrote: | > | I initially attempted installation of pkg:MatrixExtra with | > | `install.packages on my Ubuntu 18.04 LTS system

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Cpp Error installing CRAN version of MatrixExtra on Ubuntu 18.04

On 19 December 2021 at 18:14, David Winsemius wrote: | I initially attempted installation of pkg:MatrixExtra with | `install.packages on my Ubuntu 18.04 LTS system from within RStudio. It | failed with an error attempting to compile a function named "matmul.cpp" | so I tried running R from a T

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Open a text file with vi/vim in another Terminal

On 18 December 2021 at 00:07, Ivan Krylov wrote: | (Not sure whether it's a better question for R-help or R-pkg-devel.) Agreed. There is nothing Debian-specific here, these are UI-musings which, as discussed, are actually _hard_ if not impossible to solve in general. (20 years I played with R's

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Open a text file with vi/vim in another Terminal

On 17 December 2021 at 21:13, Patrice Kiener wrote: | Thank you for your suggestions. Let's give more details. The idea is to | insert the code in a function and then in a (private) package. We have | to rely on the default editors provided by the OS to R and cannot invent | a new editor, as R

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Open a text file with vi/vim in another Terminal

Patrice, Also: if you are on a terminal, have you discovered tmux / byobu yet to multiplex? It is fairly magic as you can just open as many 'sessions with the outer sessions', the sessions persist and many more advantages. I talked a little about this (with short videos) last year https:/

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Open a text file with vi/vim in another Terminal

On 17 December 2021 at 18:48, Patrice Kiener wrote: | | With Debian and macOS, the default editor (getenv("EDITOR") or | getOption("editor")) is "vi" which opens vi/vim. The following instruction: | |fileREP <- file.path(R.home("etc"), "repositories") |system2(getOption("editor"), file

Re: [R-sig-Debian] singning key of repo expired

On 16 November 2021 at 12:08, bodo riediger-klaus wrote: | Hello, | | i get a key-expired message when i try to update my repository | | root@merlot:/etc/apt/sources.list.d# cat rbase-stable.list | deb http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/bin/linux/debian buster-cran40/ | | | W: GPG-Fehler: http:

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Configure error: checking if libcurl supports https... no --- SOLVED

Rolf, Glad you're sorted out, and I concur in the thanks to Ivan (and Johannes and other who patiently helped). To me, the take-away message is that /usr/local wins generally, not just in your $PATH (or, say, in R's library path) but also for configure and friends so ... it opens the door for s

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Configure error: checking if libcurl supports https... no

On 29 August 2021 at 08:06, Michael Mahoney wrote: | Forgive me if I'm missing something here, but do you need to install | from source or do you just need R 4.1.0? | | If the latter, my understanding is that you should be able to get R | version 4.1.0 on Ubuntu distributions via: An even easie

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Configure error: checking if libcurl supports https... no

Rolf, I am truly sorry but I am getting lost in your original message. Could you follow-up and describe (concisely, if possible) what your question is? Is it - installing 4.1.1 or 4.1.0 - developing a package of yours - installing a package ? You seem to interweave a few strands in ways tha

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Configure error: checking if libcurl supports https... no

Rolf, Asking here is the Right Thing (TM) but I am in at this moment between two differen things (one of them being dinner...) so I have to come back to this but regarding > Package libcurl-dev is a virtual package provided by: > libcurl4-openssl-dev 7.68.0-1ubuntu2.6 > libcurl4-nss-dev 7.6

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Can't install package tidyverse on Debian 10 stable

Luben, Adding to what Tyler kindly said: On 23 July 2021 at 19:35, Tyler Smith wrote: | libcurl and libcurl4-openssl-dev are Debian packages, not R packages. You can install them from the command line (not R): | | sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev | | Or use your package manager. De

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Converting R package to Debian package

t tests your outer system / what is known in the _entire distribution_ which is very different from the build-a-package clean room. | Package: r-cran-dbi | Source: dbi | Version: 1.0.0-2 | Installed-Size: 1931 | Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel | Architecture: all | Depends: r-base-core (>= 3.5.0

Re: [R-sig-Debian] LTO flags in 4.1.0 Ubuntu 21.04 Makeconf

Hi Karl, Thanks for circling back! On 4 June 2021 at 17:00, Karl Dunkle Werner wrote: | For anyone else who runs into this issue, you can do either of the | following; | (a) Remove the flags "-flto=auto" and "-ffat-lto-objects" from the | CXX11FLAGS in your /etc/R/Makeconf | (b) Set CXX11FLAG

Re: [R-sig-Debian] LTO flags in 4.1.0 Ubuntu 21.04 Makeconf

Hi Karl, On 1 June 2021 at 19:12, Karl Dunkle Werner wrote: | Thanks for the very helpful response! Thanks for weaving the threads back together. | Got it, and thank you for the offer! I can edit my Makeconf (everything | works when I remove the LTO-related flags). I was hoping to make | ins

Re: [R-sig-Debian] LTO flags in 4.1.0 Ubuntu 21.04 Makeconf

Two more follow-ups if I may: - the Debian and hence derived Ubuntu package of R 4.1.0 does *not* enable LTO yet, in other words I have not yet add --enable-lto to the configure call and we use to default of 'nope' - my dev box is still 20.10; I only run 21.04 on one small machine where I

Re: [R-sig-Debian] LTO flags in 4.1.0 Ubuntu 21.04 Makeconf

Hi Karl, On 1 June 2021 at 22:22, Karl Dunkle Werner wrote: | I noticed the Makeconf file that comes with the Ubuntu version of R 4.1.0 | has link-time optimization (LTO) flags enabled. For instance: | CXX11FLAGS = -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/build/r-base-aXXzqd/r-base-4.1.0=. | -flto=auto -ffat-l

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 4.1.0 and Graphics Packages

On 25 May 2021 at 08:47, Johannes Ranke wrote: | A more systematic way would be to have R 4.1.0-2 provide r-graphics-api_14 and | only upload packages providing graphics devices that have a respective | dependency from now on. But I don't know if it's worth the trouble. If you wanted to you c

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 4.1.0 and Graphics Packages

On 21 May 2021 at 10:56, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Hi all, | | The NEWS for R 4.1.0 contain the note: | | - The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been bumped to 14 and so | packages that provide graphics devices should be reinstalled | | And indeed, I just ran into this and got a | |

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Unable to install some R packages in Ubuntu 20.04--internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

keb by conda or miniconda. Dirk | Thanks all, | Mazin | | On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:28 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | > Hi Mazin, | > | > On 19 April 2021 at 10:24, Mazin Abdelghany wrote: | > | I recently installed R onto my Ubuntu 20.04 install using the | > instru

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Keep Downloading R 3.6.3 on Linux Mint 20.1

On 22 April 2021 at 00:03, David Winsemius wrote: | The ppa for Ubuntu and Debian Ubuntu, and likely useable on derivarives like Mint but *not* Debian. You cannot (generally) mix Debian and Ubuntu. (Some vendors do for things like Chrome as .deb as all dependencies are in that package; but norm

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Unable to install some R packages in Ubuntu 20.04--internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

Hi Mazin, On 19 April 2021 at 10:24, Mazin Abdelghany wrote: | I recently installed R onto my Ubuntu 20.04 install using the instructions | here: https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/. R works as expected. | | However, while some packages have installed without issue (e.g., R.matlab), |

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Installing packages

On 18 April 2021 at 17:33, Michael Rutter wrote: | On 4/18/21 5:17 PM, James Daly wrote: | > In R, I am having trouble downloading some packages (apaTables, apaStyle, | > OpenMx, MBESS, gsl). This post Some of those are not simple but complex. The devil, as always, is in the detail. | >

Re: [R-sig-Debian] Failing to install R 4.0.? on Raspian

On 24 March 2021 at 14:47, Chris Evans wrote: | I have just invested very few pennies in a Raspian machine hosted by my ISP. | | The machine tells me: | | root@www:~# cat /etc/os-release | PRETTY_NAME="Raspbian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)" | NAME="Raspbian GNU/Linux" | VERSION_ID="10" | VERSION

Re: [R-sig-Debian] I cannot install any R package on Ubuntu: help, please!

On 5 March 2021 at 05:03, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Ooh, so we have threads on the Rstudio Forum, on StackOverflow, and here, and | on twitter... I agree this is bad style, as we have no central point to | collect information. | | From the RStudio Forum we can see that Valerio can download the p

Re: [R-sig-Debian] I cannot install any R package on Ubuntu: help, please!

On 5 March 2021 at 04:19, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Am Donnerstag, 4. März 2021, 17:52:36 CET schrieb Valerio Villani: | > I installed R and RStudio on my PC running Ubuntu 20.04. Unfortunately, I | > cannot install any package with the install.packages() function. I tried | > many things, but noth

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >