Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 July 2025 at 15:19, Ghislain Durif wrote: | @Duncan Murdoch I was indeed running the check with the release version | of R, I'll check with the development version. There are also regularly updated Docker containers if you want to run checks locally rather than as an action. See for examp

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Jan van der Laan
They also weren't found when checking on winbuilder (https://win-builder.r-project.org/)? Especially when checking with r-devel? Jan On 10-07-2025 12:13, Ghislain Durif wrote: Hi, I am the maintainer of a package for which we have done a major refactoring (work in progress, can be found h

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Etienne Bacher
Hi Ghislain, You may be interested in checkhelper::find_missing_tags(). More generally, there's a nice list of tools to prepare for CRAN submission here: https://github.com/ThinkR-open/prepare-for-cran Best, Etienne Le jeudi 10 juillet 2025 à 12:14 PM, Ghislain Durif a écrit : > > > Hi,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 10.07.25 um 12:13 schrieb Ghislain Durif: Upon my last resubmission to CRAN, some issues regarding some man pages (that I obviously missed) were found, e.g. function doc without a \value{} tag, or examples for (purposely) unexported functions. These issues were not raised during package check

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Among other tests, CRAN uses the development version of R (R-devel) for checks. It usually contains more stringent tests than the release version of R, so possibly you were using a release version for tests and that test wasn't in it. The Github action r-lib/actions/check-r-package@v2 will ru

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Ghislain Durif
Hi again, Thanks for the responses! @Jan van der Laan our package is unix-only so I did no try to check it with winbuilder. @Etienne Bacher `checkhelper::find_missing_tags()` does actually find some issue, even running with the release version of R. @Duncan Murdoch I was indeed running the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] A way to prepend/append some code before/after running package examples? (e.g. to setup CPU resource usage limits for package example run or to clean up generated files)

2025-07-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Ghislain, That email was unreadable for me in two different email clients. A common pattern for resource minimalisation is to add a snippet setting the resources in a way CRAN prefers at the beginning of each examples block, often wrapped in a \dontshow{} block, and possibly resetting at end. T

[R-pkg-devel] Tool for advanced man/doc page check?

2025-07-10 Thread Ghislain Durif
Hi, I am the maintainer of a package for which we have done a major refactoring (work in progress, can be found here ). Upon my last resubmission to CRAN, some issues regarding some man pages (that I obviously missed) we

[R-pkg-devel] A way to prepend/append some code before/after running package examples? (e.g. to setup CPU resource usage limits for package example run or to clean up generated files)

2025-07-10 Thread Ghislain Durif
OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] ggsmc: failed check

2025-07-10 Thread Richard Everitt
Hi, My R package ggsmc has been removed from CRAN after a failed check (see here https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2025/2025-07-05_check_results_ggsmc.html). I have not been able to reproduce locally the error mentioned in the check. The check fails on a vignette. I