Hi again, Thanks for the responses!
@Jan van der Laan our package is unix-only so I did no try to check it with winbuilder.
@Etienne Bacher `checkhelper::find_missing_tags()` does actually find some issue, even running with the release version of R.
@Duncan Murdoch I was indeed running the check with the release version of R, I'll check with the development version.
Thanks again, Best regards, Ghislain Durif ------------------------------------------- Research engineer -- CNRS BioComputing Hub, LBMC, ENS Lyon (France) Webpage: https://gdurif.perso.math.cnrs.fr On 10/07/2025 12:13, Ghislain Durif wrote:
Hi,I am the maintainer of a package for which we have done a major refactoring (work in progress, can be found here <https://github.com/getkeops/keops/tree/fix_rkeops_v2_keops_v2.3/rkeops>).Upon my last resubmission to CRAN, some issues regarding some man pages (that I obviously missed) were found, e.g. function doc without a \value{} tag, or examples for (purposely) unexported functions.These issues were not raised during package check (with or without `--as-cran` flag).The code base is quite large, and I would be very interested in any tool that could help me check the man pages more thoroughly than a package check ?I know about `devtools::check_man()` but it does not find the issues that I am mentioning.Thanks in advance, Best regards,
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
