Am 24.02.21 um 10:05 schrieb Sebastian Meyer:
Yes I realized that it is a problem in various packages
The question was, whether there is a mistake or a limitation.
I was wondering because the CRAN PDF also is not formatting the doi in
HTTP:\\... , but the URL
Regards Knut
I think you need to
Am 22.02.21 um 14:58 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
Write it inline as in:
See Author 1 (2021) and Author 2 (2004) .
I see at the downloaded package that the urls are not usable by clicking.
means the doi has not been converted to
https://doi.org/xyz/1234567
Any chance to fix this in the descriptio
Am 24.02.21 um 12:22 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
>
>
> On 24.02.2021 10:30, Knut Krueger wrote:
>> Am 24.02.21 um 10:05 schrieb Sebastian Meyer:
>>
>> Yes I realized that it is a problem in various packages
>> The question was, whether there is a mistake or a limitation.
>> I was wondering because the C
On 24.02.2021 10:30, Knut Krueger wrote:
Am 24.02.21 um 10:05 schrieb Sebastian Meyer:
Yes I realized that it is a problem in various packages
The question was, whether there is a mistake or a limitation.
I was wondering because the CRAN PDF also is not formatting the doi in
HTTP:\\... , bu
I think you need to be more specific. Which "downloaded package"? Which
viewer? As the list info says: "We can't help if we don't know what the
problem is."
FWIW, this format is used by many packages that I have installed on my
machine and is rendered as a link on the CRAN package website, see
htt
Am 22.02.21 um 12:07 schrieb Sebastian Meyer:
Example: Einstein et al. (1935) .
What is the syntax if I have multiple references f.e
For function foo1:
Autor1 (2000) >doi:23837454235r2354.45764>
Autor2 (2003) >doi:d73234k458f83.38358235>
For function foo2:
Autor3 (2013)
Regards Knut
On 22.02.2021 14:46, Knut Krueger wrote:
Am 22.02.21 um 12:07 schrieb Sebastian Meyer:
Example: Einstein et al. (1935) .
What is the syntax if I have multiple references f.e
For function foo1:
Autor1 (2000) >doi:23837454235r2354.45764>
Autor2 (2003) >doi:d73234k458f83.38358235>
For f
Am 22.02.21 um 11:06 schrieb Knut Krueger:
> I was suggested: "A citation in the Description file is typically a good
> idea because people can think whether your package is appropriate
> before reading all docs and installing the package, just from reading
> the CRAN overview page."
>
> but I do