Am 24.02.21 um 12:22 schrieb Uwe Ligges: > > > On 24.02.2021 10:30, Knut Krueger wrote: >> Am 24.02.21 um 10:05 schrieb Sebastian Meyer: >> >> Yes I realized that it is a problem in various packages >> The question was, whether there is a mistake or a limitation. >> I was wondering because the CRAN PDF also is not formatting the doi in >> HTTP:\\... , but the URL > > Limitation: > The intention always was to provide links from the packages' CRAN pages. > And that works. > > We may work on the PDF versions.
Good idea. I have submitted a bug report for this at https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065 and will work on a patch when time permits and if not taken up by someone else. Best regards, Sebastian Meyer > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > >> >> Regards Knut >>> I think you need to be more specific. Which "downloaded package"? Which >>> viewer? As the list info says: "We can't help if we don't know what the >>> problem is." >>> >>> FWIW, this format is used by many packages that I have installed on my >>> machine and is rendered as a link on the CRAN package website, see >>> https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=colorspace, for example. >>> >>> I can confirm that this format is not recognized in all HTML versions of >>> package descriptions out there, maybe most prominently at >>> https://rdrr.io/cran/colorspace/ and >>> https://www.r-pkg.org/pkg/colorspace . The former does not even convert >>> full URLs in the description text (such as the R-Forge URL). >>> >>> However, the lack of clickable DOIs seems to be a limitation of these >>> websites not of your package description or the CRAN policy. The >>> required <doi:10..../....> format is officially documented at >>> https://www.doi.org/doi_handbook/2_Numbering.html#2.6.1 >>> >>> Finally, again citing the list info: "Please note that while >>> R-package-devel contributors will do their best to provide you accurate >>> and authoritative information, the final arbiters of CRAN submission is >>> the CRAN team." ;) >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Sebastian Meyer >>> >>> >>> Am 24.02.21 um 09:25 schrieb Knut Krueger: >>>> Am 22.02.21 um 14:58 schrieb Uwe Ligges: >>>> >>>>> Write it inline as in: >>>>> >>>>> See Author 1 (2021) <doi:10....> and Author 2 (2004) <doi:10......>. >>>> >>>> I see at the downloaded package that the urls are not usable by >>>> clicking. >>>> means the doi <doi:xyz/1234567> has not been converted to >>>> https://doi.org/xyz/1234567 >>>> Any chance to fix this in the description file? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards Knut >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
