Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES

2023-07-18 Thread Ben Bolker
See also https://ropensci.org/blog/2022/01/21/ropensci-news-digest-january-2022/#to-quote-or-not-to-quote-non-existing-words-in-description https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/utils/html/aspell-utils.html On 2023-07-18 3:11 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 18/07/2023 12:37 p.m., Ga

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES

2023-07-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/07/2023 12:37 p.m., Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote: Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Ga

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES

2023-07-18 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:37:46 + Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote: > Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, This is fine, especially if you add a comment to your package submission. > Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the > time to run the examples (>5s

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES

2023-07-18 Thread Avraham Adler
Hello, Gabriel. CRAN policy is to rarely, if ever, allow long-running examples. It would be best if you could give an example of the function which requires as little run time as possible. Perhaps pre-compute some stages? Avi Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 18, 2023, at 9:07 PM, Gabriel Constan

[R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES

2023-07-18 Thread Gabriel Constantino Blain
Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain ' New submission Possibly misspe