Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain <gabriel.bl...@sp.gov.br>' New submission Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: EP (14:45) NASAPOWER (11:18) OperatSDI (12:9) PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9) SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20) SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12) ScientSDI (9:19) evapotranspitation (13:44) subperiods (15:76) Note 2: Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s user system elapsed ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00 Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80 Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12 Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s user system elapsed ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765 Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898 Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024
Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package PowerSDI is the name of my package's name NASAPOWER is the project's name. Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it. The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI I really appreciate any help you can provide. Best regards Gabriel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel