Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice on R-forge to Github migration

2021-02-02 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Thanks again to all who wrote on this thread: rgl now lives in git, with the main website now https://github.com/dmurdoch/rgl. Thanks especially to Joshua, who did most of the heavy lifting of actually importing the R-forge material. Duncan Murdoch __

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Undeclared packages ... in Rd xrefs

2021-02-02 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 02/02/2021 9:13 a.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote: Am 02.02.2021 um 02:38 schrieb Duncan Murdoch: On 01/02/2021 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote: Dear package developeRs, under the Fedora clang checks, I find the note "Undeclared packages ‘FrF2’, ‘DoE.wrapper’, ‘sfsmisc’, ‘DoE.MIParray’, ‘planor

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Undeclared packages ... in Rd xrefs

2021-02-02 Thread Ulrike Grömping
Am 02.02.2021 um 02:38 schrieb Duncan Murdoch: On 01/02/2021 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote: Dear package developeRs, under the Fedora clang checks, I find the note "Undeclared packages ‘FrF2’, ‘DoE.wrapper’, ‘sfsmisc’, ‘DoE.MIParray’, ‘planor’ in Rd xrefs" for my package DoE.base. I unders

[R-pkg-devel] DOIs problem 'libcurl error code 35'

2021-02-02 Thread Nuria Perez-Zanon
Dear, I am testing my package on win-builder before submitting it to CRAN. There is only one error message due to DOIs access (see below). There are several DOIs but only 3 are failing that belongs to the American Meteorological Society (AMS). I have tested them on my browser and I can access

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cache in vignette not working when checking a package

2021-02-02 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 01/02/2021 1:51 p.m., Jose Barrera wrote: Indeed, the "cache" folder is not present in the tar.gz file. Could you please help me on how to fix "the cache is not installed into the package"? Where is the cache on your local system? I think if it is in the vignettes/_cache directory, it woul

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cache in vignette not working when checking a package

2021-02-02 Thread Jose Barrera
Dear Dirk, Thanks for clarifying, now I can see Thierry's point. But the issue is that doing that my vignette would lose the "reproducible research" property because the Rnw would need all those artefacts to reproduce the pdf. I know I could combine Thierry's suggestion with playing with echo = TR