Re: [R-pkg-devel] bioconductor package required but not available

Here is the build report for KEGGgraph http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/KEGGgraph.html where it builds, and is available, across all platforms. This does not seem to be a Bioconductor problem, but rather a CRAN configuration issue. Martin Morgan Bioconductor On 9/1/20, 12:05

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

Oh, I missed that. Thank you Max and Duncan! *Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science* p: 570-419-4337 <(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business Science .

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

Hi Max, I appreciate the quick response - The webshot should no longer be an issue. My latest submission has only one vignette and I switched all of the plots from interactive (which uses webshot to convert to PNG) to ggplot2 so webshot should not be necessary. I think the CRAN Modeltime 0.2.0 re

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

Hi Matt, If you addressed the issues with the current CRAN version, then I would go with Duncan's suggestion below and treat this as a false positive. Best, Max Turgeon Assistant Professor Department of Statistics Department of Computer Science University of Manitoba maxturgeon.ca

[R-pkg-devel] bioconductor package required but not available

Hi all, All checks for my updated package seem to be all fine except for r-release-macos-x86_64 . KEGGgraph a bio conductor package is required for my package to run but is not available on the platform. It is

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

On 01/09/2020 11:52 a.m., Max Turgeon wrote: Hi Matt, If you scroll down just below the Windows and Debian OKs, you'll see these lines: Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7 See:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

Hi Matt, If you scroll down just below the Windows and Debian OKs, you'll see these lines: Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7 See:

[R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do

Hi, I'm having a difficult time with the pre-tests for Modeltime 0.1.0, a new version that I'm trying to get onto CRAN. The pre-tests indicate Windows & Debian are OK. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Matt *CRAN Pretest Results* Dear maintainer, package modeltime_0.1.0.tar.gz does

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Should a package run without calling library?

On 01.09.2020 09:43, Richel Bilderbeek wrote: Dear fellow R package maintainers, I would enjoy your advice to clarify a CRAN policy issue. The question is: should a package be able to work, when calling its exported functions using the scope operator? Or, in the example code below, should #

[R-pkg-devel] Should a package run without calling library?

Dear fellow R package maintainers, I would enjoy your advice to clarify a CRAN policy issue. The question is: should a package be able to work, when calling its exported functions using the scope operator? Or, in the example code below, should #1 work? ``` # 1. Scope operator: should this al