Hello, I am receiving this message when uploading my R package to rdevel.
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/180305_110240_Compositional_29/00check.log
Can anybody please help?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-pr
The error is that one of your documentation files is failing. Try
compiling each one separately with
R CMD Rd2pdf yourfilenamehere.Rd
and see what happens.
There is a list especially for package developers which might be better
in future.
Michael
On 05/03/2018 10:51, michael tsagris via R-he
Hi and thanks for the prompt reply. I cannot say I understood or know what to
do.
Can you please tell me which is this mailing list?
Στις 2:15 μ.μ. Δευτέρα, 5 Μαρτίου 2018, ο/η Michael Dewey
έγραψε:
The error is that one of your documentation files is failing. Try
compiling each one
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 05/03/2018 13:46, michael tsagris wrote:
Hi and thanks for the prompt reply. I cannot say I understood or know
what to do.
Can you please tell me which is this mailing list?
Στις 2:15 μ.μ. Δευτέρα, 5 Μαρτίου 2018, ο/η Michael Dewey
έ
Dear all
Have a look at 'WindCurves' package.
The package WindCurves is a tool used to fit the wind turbine power curves.
It can be useful for researchers, data analysts/scientist, practitioners,
statistians and students working on wind turbine power curves.
The package and Vignette are available
A really nice example of an instance where an "outlier" was the whole story
scientifically and hiding it with statistical summaries, here an "average"
of some sort, lost the science. Moral: "Look at your data and think."
(Ellis Ott)
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/proxima-centauri-flare-may-h
Cheers.
Στις 3:59 μ.μ. Δευτέρα, 5 Μαρτίου 2018, ο/η Michael Dewey
έγραψε:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 05/03/2018 13:46, michael tsagris wrote:
> Hi and thanks for the prompt reply. I cannot say I understood or know
> what to do.
> Can you please tell me
Hi Bert,
I am very sorry to bother you again.
For the following question, as you suggested, I posted it in both Biostars
website and stackexchange website, so far no reply.
I really hope that you can do me a great favor to share your points about how
to explain the coefficients for drug A and
Hello members,
Can I ask question for apply, adding new column to data frame on this e-mail
list?
Thanks!
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
Read the Posting Guide... (see message footer) ... some relevant things you can
find there:
a) Yes, this appears to be about how to use an R base function so it is on topic
b) Post a reproducible example (include some sample data, preferably using the
dput function)
c) Post using plain text so t
Thanks. I think nabble is good for programming questions. Bear with me if I'm
incorrect.
Data: Genomics SNP information
Goal: I need to add Chromosome and SNP position to the data frame I'm using
through apply.
I'd like to add new column from text processed through apply function.
For example
Comments interspersed, and some code at the end.
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Sariya, Sanjeev wrote:
Thanks. I think nabble is good for programming questions. Bear with me
if I'm incorrect.
You may have found R-help archives at Nabble, but R-help has nothing to do
with Nabble.
Data: Genomics SNP
Thank you, that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Newmiller [mailto:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us]
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 3:36 PM
To: Sariya, Sanjeev
Cc: r-help@r-project.org; R Help
Subject: RE: [R] Help with apply and new column?
Comments interspersed, and some code at the end.
On 03/04/2018 07:14 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
An issue is that .Random.seed doesn't contain the full state of the RNG
system, so restoring it doesn't necessarily lead to an identical sequence of
output. The only way to guarantee th
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Ding, Yuan Chun wrote:
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> I am very sorry to bother you again.
>
> For the following question, as you suggested, I posted it in both Biostars
> website and stackexchange website, so far no reply.
>
> I really hope that you can do me a great favor t
David:
I believe your response on SO is incorrect. This is a standard OFAT (one
factor at a time) design, so that assuming additivity (no interactions),
the effects of drugA and drugB can be determined via the model you rejected:
For example, if baseline control (no drugs) has a response of 0, dr
Hi Bert and David,
Thank you so much for willingness to spend some time on my problem!!! I have
some statistical knowledge (going to get a master in applied statisitics), but
do not have a chance to purse a phD for statistics, so I am always be careful
before starting to do analysis and hope t
I am sorry that I made a typo:
. I asked my collaborator whey she omitted the fourth combination drugA only
treatment,
I wanted to say . "I asked my collaborator why she omitted the fourth
combination drugB only treatment",
Ding
-Original Message-
From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun..
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>
> David:
>
> I believe your response on SO is incorrect. This is a standard OFAT (one
> factor at a time) design, so that assuming additivity (no interactions), the
> effects of drugA and drugB can be determined via the model you rejected:
>
But of course the whole point of additivity is to decompose the combined
effect as the sum of individual effects.
"Mislead" is a subjective judgment, so no comment. The explanation I
provided is standard. I used it for decades when I taught in industry.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble w
Yuan:
IMHO you need to stop making up your own statistical analyses and get local
expert help.
I have nothing further to say. Do what you will.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley
Hi List,
The following code returns an "Error in as.POSIXlt.character(x, tz, ...) :
character string is not in a standard unambiguous format"
require(raster)
require(rts)
require(stringi)
r <- raster(ncol=100, nrow=100)
values(r) <- runif(ncell(r))
list(ID=seq(1:24),month=rep(str_pad(1:12, pad
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>
> But of course the whole point of additivity is to decompose the combined
> effect as the sum of individual effects.
Agreed. Furthermore your encoding of the treatment assignments has the
advantage that the default treatment contrast for A+B
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 3:28 PM,
> wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> The following code returns an "Error in as.POSIXlt.character(x, tz, ...) :
> character string is not in a standard unambiguous format"
I'm unable to produce that error. Which function was being evaluated to produce
the error? I don'
Hi Herry,
This is probably due to a call to strptime (or similar). No, it
doesn't accept %Y-%m as a valid format. Maybe add a constant day to
all the dates as that will work:
dt<-list(ID=seq(1:24),month=rep(formatC(1:12,flag=0,width=2),2),
year=sort(rep(2016:2017,12)))
timelst<-paste(unlist(dt['y
Thanks Jim
Still getting the same error for apply.montly
Updated code:
require(raster)
require(rts)
require(stringr)
r <- raster(ncol=100, nrow=100)
values(r) <- runif(ncell(r))
stack(r)->s
r->rs
for(i in 1:23){
rs[]<-r[]*i
addLayer(s,rs)->s
print(nlayers(s))
}
dt<-list(ID=seq(1:24),month=rep
Last line in the following (updated) code produces the error
require(raster)
require(rts)
require(stringr)
r <- raster(ncol=100, nrow=100)
values(r) <- runif(ncell(r))
stack(r)->s
r->rs
for(i in 1:23){
rs[]<-r[]*i
addLayer(s,rs)->s
print(nlayers(s))
}
dt<-list(ID=seq(1:24),month=rep(formatC(1:1
I can't test that at the moment as I don't have the libraries. Perhaps later.
Jim
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:36 AM, wrote:
> Last line in the following (updated) code produces the error
> require(raster)
> require(rts)
> require(stringr)
> r <- raster(ncol=100, nrow=100)
> values(r) <- runif(nce
Thanks a lot, after reading this message, I think I got the advantage of Bert's
coding. Those two drugs indeed do not interact with each other, so additive
assumption is valid.
I learned a lot today. Thanks again.
Ding
-Original Message-
From: David Winsemius [mailto:dwinsem...@comcas
It works if you use as.Date. But this defeates the purpose for the yearmon
notion...
require(raster)
require(rts)
require(stringr)
r <- raster(ncol=100, nrow=100)
values(r) <- runif(ncell(r))
stack(r)->s
r->rs
for(i in 1:23){
rs[]<-r[]*i
addLayer(s,rs)->s
print(nlayers(s))
}
dt<-list(ID=seq(1
30 matches
Mail list logo