Hi,
You could try:
Chisq1<-do.call(cbind,lapply(c(0.05,0.001),function(i)
{x1<-sapply(seq_len(nrow(Specc)),function(i)
chisq.test(as.table(unlist(Specc[i,-c(1:3)])))$p.value); sum(x1
To: arun
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Kruskal.test
Thank you.
But I need to construct a
Hi,
Please dput() your example dataset.
dat1<- read.table(text="a a a a a b b b c c c c
2 4 5 2 7 2 2 6 3 7 9 3
3 3 4 1 6 8 1 3 5 2 6
3",sep="",header=FALSE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
library(reshape)
dat2<-melt(as
Hello,
Another possibility is to use the formula interface.
x <- scan(what = "character", text = "
a a a aab bbcc cc")
y <- scan(text = "
2 45 272 2637 93")
kruskal.test(y ~ factor(x))
dat <-
structure(list(x = structure(c(1
Hi,
?kruskal.test()
a<- c(2,4,5,2,7)
b<- c(2,2,6)
c<- c(3,7,9,3)
kruskal.test(list(a,b,c))
#
# Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test
#
#data: list(a, b, c)
#Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 2.003, df = 2, p-value = 0.3673
A.K.
Hi
I need an expression in R to apply a kruskal.test to this data (for exa
On Jul 5, 2013, at 16:34 , Humber Andrade wrote:
> Thank you Dr. Dalgaard. I understood. I know that this list is not to discuss
> statistics but I would be very glad if you or someone else can give me some
> opinion on how to proceed. The kruskal.test says there are differences but
> the mult
Thank you Dr. Dalgaard. I understood. I know that this list is not to
discuss statistics but I would be very glad if you or someone else can give
me some opinion on how to proceed. The kruskal.test says there are
differences but the multiple comparisons do not point out what are the
differences. Ca
On Jul 5, 2013, at 15:00 , Humber Andrade wrote:
> Thank you Prof. José Iparraguirre. Maybe I am wrong but I think the issues
> are not the same. His data doesn't showed significant differences after
> kruskal.test(), that was not my case. Anyway follow below my the results
> I've got and the dat
Thank you Prof. José Iparraguirre. Maybe I am wrong but I think the issues
are not the same. His data doesn't showed significant differences after
kruskal.test(), that was not my case. Anyway follow below my the results
I've got and the database.
Thank you,
#
> kruskal.test(data$r
Humber,
Have a look at this:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-Comparisons-Kruskal-Wallis-Test-kruskal-agricolae-and-kruskalmc-pgirmess-don-t-yield-the-sa-td4639004.html
Hope it helps.
Kind regards,
José
Prof. José Iparraguirre
Chief Economist
Age UK
-Original Message-
From: r-he
Altaweel, Mark R. wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to do a kruskal wallis test on two lists, fVisited and cSN:
fVisited[[1]]
[1] 0.17097623 0.30376141 0.17577266 0.14951855 0.03959753 0.08096217
0.05744888 0.02196257
cSN[[1]]
[1] 0.08557303 0.36477791 0.19601252 0.12981040 0.05351320 0.1038554
10 matches
Mail list logo
