Am 15. Juni 2011 09:19 schrieb Uwe Ligges :
>
>
> On 15.06.2011 01:21, Kornelius Rohmeyer wrote:
>>
>> 2011/6/11 Duncan Murdoch:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> I don't understand. It sounds as though you're saying these two
>>> contradictory
2011/6/11 Duncan Murdoch :
[...]
> I don't understand. It sounds as though you're saying these two
> contradictory things:
>
> - your package works with any version of graph
> - CRAN builds a version of graph that is incompatible with your package.
No, the first statement is correct but not the
2011/6/11 Prof Brian Ripley :
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Kornelius Rohmeyer wrote:
>> 2011/6/11 Prof Brian Ripley :
>>> Note that until May 8 graph was a CRAN packge and the current version was
>>> 1.30.0. So of course CRAN binary packages built between April 26 and May
&
conductor? (And btw. is there a
way to find out which versions of the dependent packages were used for
building a certain binary package?)
Thanks and best regards, Kornelius.
>
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Martin Morgan wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2011 05:46 PM, Kornelius Rohmeyer wr
2011/6/11 Duncan Murdoch :
> On 11-06-10 7:04 PM, Kornelius Rohmeyer wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> for a CRAN-package that depends on another Bioconductor-package I find
>> two things annoying and would like to know whether there are some
>> workarounds:
>>
>
2011/6/11 Martin Morgan :
> On 06/10/2011 05:46 PM, Kornelius Rohmeyer wrote:
>>
>> Dear Martin,
>>
>> thanks for your response.
>>
>>>> The superclass graphBase is introduced in graph 1.30. In my
>>>> understanding the problem is that o
Dear Martin,
thanks for your response.
>> The superclass graphBase is introduced in graph 1.30. In my
>> understanding the problem is that our package gMCP is build on CRAN
>> for R 2.12 with the package graph in version 1.30. Unfortunately
>> biocLite installs graph_1.28.0.zip for R 2.12.
>
> bi
I'm sorry for sending a wrongly formated mail before. This is the missing text:
Dear all,
for a CRAN-package that depends on another Bioconductor-package I find
two things annoying and would like to know whether there are some
workarounds:
1) Is there some inevitable problem that install.package
Dear all,
for a CRAN-package that depends on another Bioconductor-package I find two
things annoying and would like to know whether there are some workarounds:
1) Is there some inevitable problem that install.packages does not install
uninstalled packages (on which the specified package depends)
