Re: [Rd] weird error

2011-10-31 Thread steven mosher
Thanks, found it. never say you only changed one thing. For reference for other folks. There was an errant script in my R subdir for the package that script had a library command for the package. hence the cyclical reference Steve On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:36 PM, steven mosher wrote: > I was

[Rd] weird error

2011-10-31 Thread steven mosher
I was just rebuilding a package that has built before and I hit this error Error in loadNamespace(package, c(which.lib.loc, lib.loc), keep.source = keep.source) : cyclic name space dependency detected when loading 'GhcnDaily', already loading 'GhcnDaily' The package built just fine last revisi

Re: [Rd] Sweave, cairo_pdf, xetex, CJK (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)

2011-10-31 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Mon, 31/10/11, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Well, I don't see how most of the above is in any way > relevant. What PDF gets generated really depends on the > cairo version you are using, not on R. Only most recent > versions of Cairo (1.10.x) switched the format to PDF-1.5 > and added format res

Re: [Rd] Sweave, cairo_pdf, xetex, CJK (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)

2011-10-31 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Oct 31, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Mon, 31/10/11, Simon Urbanek wrote: > >> On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> >>> I am still doing some cosmetic things (adding >> annotations with some of the really minority languages in >> Sichuan), but here are a fe

Re: [Rd] Sweave, cairo_pdf, xetex, CJK (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)

2011-10-31 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Mon, 31/10/11, Simon Urbanek wrote: > On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > > I am still doing some cosmetic things (adding > annotations with some of the really minority languages in > Sichuan), but here are a few misc tips and quirks so far: > > > > - cairo_pdf() behave

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Martin Maechler
Hi Kasper, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 16:55, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > > Martin, > > I am pretty sure (but I will probably be proven wrong) that when > r-announce was created it was stated that every email got sent to both > r-help and r-devel, Hmm, I don't believe you.  To the contrary, I'd ev

Re: [Rd] Sweave, cairo_pdf, xetex, CJK (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)

2011-10-31 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Oct 31, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > I am still doing some cosmetic things (adding annotations with some of the > really minority languages in Sichuan), but here are a few misc tips and > quirks so far: > > - cairo_pdf() behaves differently via "R CMD Sweave " vs Sweave("file")

[Rd] Sweave, cairo_pdf, xetex, CJK (Re: Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript)

2011-10-31 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
I am still doing some cosmetic things (adding annotations with some of the really minority languages in Sichuan), but here are a few misc tips and quirks so far: - cairo_pdf() behaves differently via "R CMD Sweave " vs Sweave("file") within R. The former produces a lot of warnings about not bei

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
Martin, I am pretty sure (but I will probably be proven wrong) that when r-announce was created it was stated that every email got sent to both r-help and r-devel, and I see I have received emails from r-announce in the past despite only being subscribed to r-devel and not r-help. For example, I c

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Martin Maechler
> Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter. Sorry if I > missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than > r-help, which I find a bit hard to quickly read. But please --- this concerns every one on R-devel --- if you do not subscribe to R-help, then do subscribe to R-announce

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Renaud Gaujoux
Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter. Sorry if I missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than r-help, which I find a bit hard to quickly read. Will try now on the 2.14.0. Renaud On 31/10/2011 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: I do not see

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread peter dalgaard
On Oct 31, 2011, at 13:23 , Renaud Gaujoux wrote: > I do not see it on main CRAN home page. > Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ? Links need to be updated. Have a look in http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2 > > On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote:

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: I do not see it on main CRAN home page. No, but see the announcement on R-announce this morning: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/294203.html Things which need human intervention can take some hours: the CRAN front page and binary

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 31.10.2011 13:23, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: I do not see it on main CRAN home page. Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ? Home page is not yet updated, see today's announcement by Peter Dalgaard who said it is at: http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Renaud Gaujoux
I do not see it on main CRAN home page. Do you mean http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz ? On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: Thank you Duncan. I tried with: * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417) * using platfo

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: Thank you Duncan. I tried with: * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417) * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit) But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and the strange error if an error occurs in \Sexpr. Is your patch in

Re: [Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file

2011-10-31 Thread Renaud Gaujoux
Thank you Duncan. I tried with: * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 r57417) * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit) But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and the strange error if an error occurs in \Sexpr. Is your patch included in this version? I will try now with