Hi Kasper, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 16:55, Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Martin, > > I am pretty sure (but I will probably be proven wrong) that when > r-announce was created it was stated that every email got sent to both > r-help and r-devel,
Hmm, I don't believe you. To the contrary, I'd even bet a bit on that. Always to R-help, but not to R-devel,... If you have real proof please "present" it.. (but this *is* getting off-topic... we should probably continue off-R-devel ..) Martin > > and I see I have received emails from r-announce > in the past despite only being subscribed to r-devel and not r-help. > For example, I can find the announcement of R-2.13.0 (posted by P > Dalgaard) (and many earlier versions), but not R-2.13.1. While I am > pretty sure I have only subscribed to r-help for a brief period many > years ago, I did switch my r-devel subscription from one email address > to another. > > I infer from your email that r-announce emails are no longer sent to > r-devel subscribers (which is consistent with the text on > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-announce > ). > > Kasper > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Martin Maechler > <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter. Sorry if I > > > missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than > > > r-help, which I find a bit hard to quickly read. > > > > But please --- this concerns every one on R-devel --- > > if you do not subscribe to R-help, > > then do subscribe to R-announce -- that one has about > > one posting *per month* and is really only for important > > announcements (and basically reserved for R-core to post). > > > > See a list of *all* R-announce postings of 2011 : > > > > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2011/date.html > > > > with the 2.14.0 announcement at the end. > > > > Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich > > > > > > > Will try now on the 2.14.0. > > > > > Renaud > > > > > On 31/10/2011 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > > >> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: > > >> > > >>> I do not see it on main CRAN home page. > > >> > > >> No, but see the announcement on R-announce this morning: > > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/294203.html > > >> > > >> Things which need human intervention can take some hours: > > >> the CRAN front page and binary distributions are two of > > >> those. > > >> > > >>> Do you mean > > >>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz > > >>> ? > > >>> > > >>> On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: > > >>>>> Thank you Duncan. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I tried with: * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24 > > >>>>> r57417) * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > > >>>>> (64-bit) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and > > >>>>> the strange error if an error occurs in \Sexpr. Is > > >>>>> your patch included in this version? I will try now > > >>>>> with R-rc_2011-10-27_r57452.tar.gz. > > >>>> > > >>>> Try R-2.14.0, it is already released. Or R-devel. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best, Uwe Ligges > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> Renaud > >>>>> > >>>>> On 28/10/2011 17:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >>>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: > >>>>>>> > Hi, > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs > >>>>>>> in an > >>>>>>> > \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error: > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK > >>>>>>> > * checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS) > >>>>>>> ... OK > >>>>>>> > * checking examples ... ERROR > >>>>>>> > Error in paste(before, x, after, sep = "") : object 'exfile' > >>>>>>> not found > >>>>>>> > Execution halted > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > To reproduce, put a call like this in an Rd section: > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > \Sexpr[results=verbatim, stage=render]{x<- 1; stop("sexpr error")} > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > The strange thing is that it occurs at the example checking step. > >>>>>>> > Not sure why it does not break before. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > Thank you. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > Renaud > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > PS: I am on R version 2.13.2 (2011-09-30) - x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > >>>>>>> (64-bit) > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would update to 2.13.2 patched, or the release candidate of > >>>>>>> 2.14.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oops, sorry, 2.13.2 is "final", so I didn't backport the patch. > >>>>>> 2.14.0 > >>>>>> is what you should get. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch > >>>>> > >>>>> ______________________________________________ > >>>>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > >>> > >>> ______________________________________________ > >>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > >>> > >> > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
