On Wed, 7 May 2008, Matt Sergeant wrote:
So the next release I consider to be a fairly major step - we've got
async/smtp-forward and async tls working. That's most of the showstoppers
against using async in production.
So what's missing and what would you like to see before the next release?
Matt Sergeant escribió:
So the next release I consider to be a fairly major step - we've got
async/smtp-forward and async tls working. That's most of the
showstoppers against using async in production.
So what's missing and what would you like to see before the next release?
(obviously not li
On 9-May-08, at 11:25 AM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
Proposal 4:
I'd like to see a qmail-queue async plugin. I'd put myself to the
task, but by async programming skills tend to null for the moment.
I don't think that's possible, since qmail-queue is fork/exec'd. I
guess you could async the
Matt Sergeant escribió:
On 9-May-08, at 11:25 AM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
Proposal 4:
I'd like to see a qmail-queue async plugin. I'd put myself to the
task, but by async programming skills tend to null for the moment.
I don't think that's possible, since qmail-queue is fork/exec'd. I gues
Hi,
Not a great improvement, just moves code. Exiting as soon as you know
you have to.
--- SMTP.pm.old 2008-05-09 19:03:21.0 +0200
+++ SMTP.pm 2008-05-09 19:22:46.0 +0200
@@ -668,6 +668,14 @@
#$self->log(LOGDEBUG, "size is at $size\n") unless ($i % 300);
}
+ # if
On Thu, 8 May 2008 23:13:17 -0700
Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 8, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
>
> [Adding connection->reset]
> > This also works, with no workaround in plugins/tls. Matt, Ask: Ok to
> > commit this and remove the tls-prefork workaround (maybe also
On 9-May-08, at 1:00 PM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
Matt Sergeant escribió:
On 9-May-08, at 11:25 AM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
Proposal 4:
I'd like to see a qmail-queue async plugin. I'd put myself to the
task, but by async programming skills tend to null for the moment.
I don't think that's
On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!). Any
reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/apache?
Laziness :-D
On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:51:17 -0400
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
>
> > Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!). Any
> > reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/apache?
>
> Laziness :-D
I see :)
Would
On 9-May-08, at 3:30 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:51:17 -0400
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!).
Any
reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/a
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 9-May-08, at 1:00 PM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
On the other hand, we could directly write the files in the queue, like
qmail-queue.c, not having to fork and exec to bin/qmail-queue... and all in
async-fashion.
That's not entirely possible I don'
On 9-May-08, at 6:53 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 9-May-08, at 1:00 PM, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
On the other hand, we could directly write the files in the
queue, like qmail-queue.c, not having to fork and exec to bin/
qmail-queue... and all in asy
12 matches
Mail list logo
