Charlie Brady wrote:
Forkserver spawns and forks a bunch of qpsmtpd processes ahead of time
instead of the shell having to spawn a new perl process each time a
connection comes in.
Not quite - that's prefork :-)
Forkserver forks on every connection, but has the perl code pre-parsed
in
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Bryan Scott wrote:
Forkserver spawns and forks a bunch of qpsmtpd processes ahead of time
instead of the shell having to spawn a new perl process each time a
connection comes in.
Not quite - that's prefork :-)
Forkserver for
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Bryan Scott wrote:
Forkserver spawns and forks a bunch of qpsmtpd processes ahead of time
instead of the shell having to spawn a new perl process each time a
connection comes in.
Not quite - that's prefork :-)
Forkserver forks on every connection, but has the perl code p
Michael Salbinger wrote:
hi,
thanks a lot, we installed forkserver and now, everything is nice,
i am only wondering, why the step between normal operation without forkserver
and then extreme high load, is so big... maybe the spam got more.
now the box is having a load from 0.50 to 2.
thats very
hi,
thanks a lot, we installed forkserver and now, everything is nice,
i am only wondering, why the step between normal operation without forkserver
and then extreme high load, is so big... maybe the spam got more.
now the box is having a load from 0.50 to 2.
thats very nice!
regards
m.
--
__
On 11-Mar-08, at 5:00 PM, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
Matt Sergeant skribis 2008-03-11 16:01 (-0400):
Compaq (HP) G3.
Dual Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (so 4 CPUs under hyperthreading).
Load is spread across 4 mail servers (...)
Impressive; must have been nice to design the setup.. Thanks for the
Matt Sergeant skribis 2008-03-11 16:01 (-0400):
> Compaq (HP) G3.
> Dual Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (so 4 CPUs under hyperthreading).
> Load is spread across 4 mail servers (...)
Impressive; must have been nice to design the setup.. Thanks for the
description.
--
Met vriendelijke groet, Kind
On 11-Mar-08, at 3:10 PM, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
Matt Sergeant skribis 2008-03-11 15:11 (-0400):
On 11-Mar-08, at 1:53 PM, Jens Weibler wrote:
I can't imagine that you've so much spam connections at the same
time.
Concurrency on our (qpsmtpd-async) spamtrap goes up to 3000 several
times a day
Matt Sergeant skribis 2008-03-11 15:11 (-0400):
> On 11-Mar-08, at 1:53 PM, Jens Weibler wrote:
> >I can't imagine that you've so much spam connections at the same time.
> Concurrency on our (qpsmtpd-async) spamtrap goes up to 3000 several
> times a day. I've seen it hit 10k.
What kind of machin
On 11-Mar-08, at 1:53 PM, Jens Weibler wrote:
I can't imagine that you've so much spam connections at the same time.
Concurrency on our (qpsmtpd-async) spamtrap goes up to 3000 several
times a day. I've seen it hit 10k.
Be thankful if you're NOT getting that sort of concurrency :-)
Matt.
Michael Salbinger wrote:
my box is running with a load average of 40.
there are mostly 100 to 140 tcpserver qpsmtpd connections.
most of them spambots.
the smtp dialog is very slow, up to 1-2 minutes each.
i am reading all day long but nothing seems to help.
Have you checked your DNS setup?
O
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Michael Salbinger wrote:
my box is running with a load average of 40.
there are mostly 100 to 140 tcpserver qpsmtpd connections.
most of them spambots.
Did you try qpsmtpd-forkserver instead of running under tcpserver?
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://
Hi there,
my box is running with a load average of 40.
there are mostly 100 to 140 tcpserver qpsmtpd connections.
most of them spambots.
the smtp dialog is very slow, up to 1-2 minutes each.
i am reading all day long but nothing seems to help.
cpu: 3ghz x2
ram: 2gb
qpsmtpd 0.40 (same with 0.32)
13 matches
Mail list logo
