Re: email address validation

2007-10-24 Thread sub-194-4
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Robert Spier wrote: > At Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:49:31 + (UTC), > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > What, exactly, is being done to validate sender/recipient email addresses > > during a connection? > > > > Should this be enforced, ignored, reported? > > Feel free to write a pl

Re: email address validation

2007-10-23 Thread Robert Spier
At Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:49:31 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What, exactly, is being done to validate sender/recipient email addresses > during a connection? > > I am finding that there are many, otherwise legit, addresses with local > portions that are too long. RFC 2821 4.5.3.1 says 6

Re: email address validation

2007-10-23 Thread Elliot Foster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, exactly, is being done to validate sender/recipient email addresses during a connection? I am finding that there are many, otherwise legit, addresses with local portions that are too long. RFC 2821 4.5.3.1 says 64 characters maximum, yet I regularly see much longer

email address validation

2007-10-23 Thread sub-194-4
What, exactly, is being done to validate sender/recipient email addresses during a connection? I am finding that there are many, otherwise legit, addresses with local portions that are too long. RFC 2821 4.5.3.1 says 64 characters maximum, yet I regularly see much longer (last one I checked was 10