On May 5, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Steve Kemp wrote:
I'll have to beat myself later, in the meantime here's a patch
against SVN trunk:
http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/tmp/qpsmtpd/qpsmtpd-txn-transaction.diff
Committed, thanks! (r885)
Might be worth removing the file "log/.cvsignore" from th
On May 5, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Steve Kemp wrote:
I'm not 100% familiar with the Makefile.PL in the source directory,
but I see that there is already a "perltidyrc" file, so it shouldn't
be a huge job to automate the invocation of perltidy.
For now if we just made a habit of running perltidy on
On Mon May 05, 2008 at 16:22:34 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I will submit a patch against the trunk hopefully tomorrow.
Hmm, that was actually a small job. It seems that I was being
inconsistent much more in my *own* plugins than the core is. Ahem.
I'll have to beat myself later, in the
On Mon May 05, 2008 at 11:06:18 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Yes, it has been discussed before. We just need the tuits to make it so.
I'm not 100% familiar with the Makefile.PL in the source directory,
but I see that there is already a "perltidyrc" file, so it shouldn't
be a huge job to auto
On 5-May-08, at 10:45 AM, Steve Kemp wrote:
Seeing changes like this makes me wonder if we should consider
running
all source through perltidy at some point. Perhaps as part of a
"make update", or "make commit" target.
Yes, it has been discussed before. We just need the tuits to make it
On Sun May 04, 2008 at 21:21:03 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> --- plugins/tls (revision 876)
> +++ plugins/tls (working copy)
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
> return DECLINED unless $local_port == 465; # SMTPS
>
> unless ( _convert_to_ssl($self) ) {
> - return (DENY_DISCONNECT, "Cannot esta
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 4-May-08, at 7:28 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yeah this makes a lot more sense... Though I wonder if we shouldn't
modify Danga::Client to just have some sort of "reader" entry, so that
anything else (not just TLS) can hook into the event_read stream. I'll
have a poke.
C
On 4-May-08, at 7:28 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yeah this makes a lot more sense... Though I wonder if we shouldn't
modify Danga::Client to just have some sort of "reader" entry, so
that anything else (not just TLS) can hook into the event_read
stream. I'll have a poke.
Can you check if thi
Yeah this makes a lot more sense... Though I wonder if we shouldn't
modify Danga::Client to just have some sort of "reader" entry, so
that anything else (not just TLS) can hook into the event_read
stream. I'll have a poke.
On 4-May-08, at 12:59 PM, Douglas Hunter wrote:
Howdy all,
In the
