On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2007-10-19 11:34:32 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, David Nicol wrote:
FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
"Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
I think Bernstein is mista
On 2007-10-19 11:34:32 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, David Nicol wrote:
> >FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
> >
> >"Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
I think Bernstein is mistaken here. He should have written "it req
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
Anyway, will some or all of the patch be accepted and committed?
No, we'll bikeshed it to death first! :-)
Thanks for sticking through with it. See my other mail, we'll get
you setup so you can commit it yourself.
- ask
--
http://de
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, David Nicol wrote:
FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
"Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
That's actually an open question, due to what appears to be a drafting
error in RFC2821. In 4.1.2 Command Argument Syntax,
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 17:29 -0500, David Nicol wrote:
> FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
>
> "Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
I should have read past the first paragraph ...
Bernstein was writing before RFC 2822 was final, I believe.
On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
qpsmtpd currently accepts <""@domain.name> as a recipient address,
and (unless rejected for some other reason) will queue to
@domain.name.
I don't think conforms with RFC2821, and I don't think it's ever
needed.
I thought it was technic
FWIW, later on http://cr.yp.to/im/address.html Bernstein says
"Do not use an empty box part; it cannot appear in SMTP requests."
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:27 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
> qpsmtpd currently accepts <""@domain.name> as a recipient address, and
> (unless rejected for some other reason) will queue to @domain.name.
> I don't think conforms with RFC2821, and I don't think it's ever needed.
RFC 2821 says that loca
qpsmtpd currently accepts <""@domain.name> as a recipient address, and
(unless rejected for some other reason) will queue to @domain.name.
I don't think conforms with RFC2821, and I don't think it's ever needed.
This patch to check_badrcptto would fix:
sub hook_rcpt {
my ($self, $transac
