[Qmail-scanner-general]Setup problem -- I am stuck

2003-08-26 Thread Ted Fines
Hi all, System: qmail 1.03, qmail-scanner 1.20rc2 The problem, in a nutshell: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# su fines (unprivileged acct) [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g perlscanner: generate new DB file from /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine-attachments.txt X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20rc2:

[Qmail-scanner-general]Alpha Machine

2003-08-26 Thread Awie
All, My new office has Alpha Machine running RedHat 7.2. Do you have any suggestion installing qmail scanner to the such machine? Thx & Rgds, Awie --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating s

[Qmail-scanner-general]scanning speed

2003-08-26 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi: I'm using F-secure for Linux Workstations and it is taking 10 to 15 seconds to scan each email. This seems like a long time - is it normal? Should I upgrade to the F-Secure for Linux Servers? Might be worth the extra $300 if it is faster or is there anything else I should be doing? Thanks

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spam Assassin Scripts

2003-08-26 Thread Tyler
Hello All, I was curious how to go about changing the qmail-scanner setup to include my own spamassassin scripts instead of just calling spamc? The scripts I have will block spam as well as log the to, from and subject of spam messages so that the logs can be parsed to see if valid email was bloc

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F

2003-08-26 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: CertaintyTech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:25 AM > To: Dallas L. Engelken; 'ML qmail-scanner' > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F > > > Shouldn't the last entry in the access-list be: > > access-list 102 permit

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Worm.Sobig.F

2003-08-26 Thread CertaintyTech
Shouldn't the last entry in the access-list be: access-list 102 permit ip any any Otherwise all other traffic will be blocked. --- Ed Henderson Certainty Tech http://www.certainty.net/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dallas L.

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general][Qmail-scanner-announce] Query for 1.20: should perlscanner be run AFTER AV scanners?

2003-08-26 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 07:15:59AM -0600, Sancho2k.net Lists wrote: > I guess what I'm asking is could an attacker bring down the system by > forcing resource-intensive content through the AV scanner? Well of course - they always could. This has nothing to do with Q-S - it affects everything you

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Query for 1.20: should perlscanner be run AFTER AV scanners?

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Pleiner
* Cream[DONut] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-25 01:46]: > At 11:03 25-08-2003 +1200, you wrote: > >You've seen several people ask why when they block .PIF/etc files, the fact > >that message contained a virus isn't detected. And you've seen the replies: > >it's a design issue. The component that qua

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]scanning speed

2003-08-26 Thread Brad Dameron
There doesn't seem to be any difference between the two versions. Just the piece of mind of licensing issues. However do the following to have it use the client instead of launch a server everytime. This is only for fsecure 4.50 and QS 1.20rc versions. In your fsavd start script change the follow

[Qmail-scanner-general]IMP and qmail-inject calling qmail-scanner-queue.pl

2003-08-26 Thread Rick Romero
Hey all, I've been using IMP and smtp to make sure that qmail-scanner-queue.pl is called for every email, but under heavy load that starts to slow a bit. So I've been trying to convert to using qmail's sendmail (/var/qmail/bin/sendmail), and I can't get QMAILQUEUE to 'go'. There's not much in t

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]AVP no longer selling Client version!!

2003-08-26 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:49:25 -0700 Brad Dameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well since AVP is no longer selling the client version and you have to pay $500 > for a 1 year license. It is time to find a new virus scanner for our mail server. > What does everyone recommend? What seems to be the

[Qmail-scanner-general]getmail

2003-08-26 Thread Marlon Cabrera Oliveira
I wanna setup qmail-scanner to process mails using getmail for soho what dont have a mail server, like this: ISP --> getmail --> qmail-scanner(clamav+spamassasin) --> Maildir --> Outlook Express Anybody already try to do this berfore??? Regards, Marlon

[Qmail-scanner-general]Suggestion: Option to archive all messages tagged by SpamAssassin

2003-08-26 Thread Brian Ipsen
Hi! I miss an option, where it is possible to specify that qmail-scanner should archive all mails that SpamAssassin identifies as spam. The reason for this is that I'd like to be able to gather statistics on what rules are triggered on each message - and I can only do this either by storing a c

[Qmail-scanner-general]new to qmailscanner

2003-08-26 Thread Jennifer Fountain
And.. I am trying to install but keep getting this error: Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but not working (didn't include a "X-Spam-Status" line in output) - ignoring... ** Cannot find unzip on your system! As this is probably a virus sc

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]new to qmailscanner

2003-08-26 Thread D.Monroe
Jennifer Fountain wrote: And.. I am trying to install but keep getting this error: Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but not working (didn't include a "X-Spam-Status" line in output) - ignoring... ** Cannot find unzip on your system! have you

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Query for 1.20: should perlscannerbe run AFTER AV s

2003-08-26 Thread Philip Chase
>>> Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/24/03 7:03:34 PM >>> > Would anyone mind if Q-S ran the AVs first and perlscanner last? The upside > is that even if you block all PIF files, those with SoBIG would be reported > correctly instead of being "policy" quarantines. Please make this change. We are

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Suggestion: Option to archive all messagestagged by SpamAssassin

2003-08-26 Thread David Raistrick
> I miss an option, where it is possible to specify that qmail-scanner > should archive all mails that SpamAssassin identifies as spam. A while ago I submitted some changes (abiet not patches) to version 1.14 that did something similar. (allowed you to rewrite the delivery address of tagged me

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Suggestion: Option to archive all messages tagged by SpamAssassin

2003-08-26 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Ipsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 10:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Suggestion: Option to archive > all messages tagged by SpamAssassin > > > Hi! > > I miss an option, where it is possib