Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]with spamassassin

2004-07-20 Thread Jonathan Tai
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 10:46 +1200, Jason Haar wrote: > You can rely on your users to tell you when SA is down ;-) Amen. > Seriously, tools such as supervise from daemontools can help auto- > restart services when they die. That'd keep SA running. Clam has an annoying habit of hanging sometimes

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]with spamassassin

2004-07-18 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:55:31PM -0700, Jonathan Tai wrote: > In my experience, mail will still be delivered if SA goes down. You > should be more worried about your AV; if it dies, mail will be rejected > with "qq temporary error" or something similar. That is absolutely correct. By design Q

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]with spamassassin

2004-07-16 Thread Jonathan Tai
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 14:18, Brian Ipsen wrote: > Hi, > > > I use qmail-scanner with verbose spamassassin. I am worried about > > what will happen to the mail if spamassassin dies down. Will the mail > > be bounced back? > > I have no idea what will happen - but why not run spamd under daemontool

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]with spamassassin

2004-07-16 Thread Brian Ipsen
Hi, > I use qmail-scanner with verbose spamassassin. I am worried about > what will happen to the mail if spamassassin dies down. Will the mail > be bounced back? I have no idea what will happen - but why not run spamd under daemontools ? That way it will (almost) always be running, and if it cra

[Qmail-scanner-general]with spamassassin

2004-07-16 Thread Payal Rathod
Hi, I use qmail-scanner with verbose spamassassin. I am worried about what will happen to the mail if spamassassin dies down. Will the mail be bounced back? With warm regards, -Payal --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop F