>
> Vpopmail shows up regularly as a problem here.
>
> It's a Qmail addon that I don't use, and appears to alter things quite
> dramatically from how Qmail normally operates.
>
> This should be mentioned in the FAQ as a warning. Can some vpopmail user
> come up with a paragraph for me that explain
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 16:09, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:28:42PM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > roaming user feature...)... Guess what? I found the problem. Vpopmail has a
> > roaming user option which dynamically adds entries to the tcp.smtp file to
>
> Vpopma
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:28:42PM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> roaming user feature...)... Guess what? I found the problem. Vpopmail has a
> roaming user option which dynamically adds entries to the tcp.smtp file to
Vpopmail shows up regularly as a problem here.
It's a Qmail ad
>
> Just a thouhgt...
> perhaps virtualdomains are to "blame" for 127.0.0.1 "interferance"?
> More complete picture of the setup would be helpful.
>
Yes, I do use virtual domains and vpopmail. Could that be it? All domains
that I handle are virtual...(long pause as Ed looks into the vpopmail
ro
Ed,
No answers, but what really amazes me is the reactions you got on your
question.
It seems pretty clear to me that you are not using qs for the first time.
And I know you have helped lots of people with their questions in the
past.
Anyways I feel generally sorry that the reactions where this
>
> Well there's no way settings for 127.0.0.1 could affect anything unless
> they'r used. So the next question must be: *how* do you get mail onto your
> box? fetchmail perhaps...? Fetchmail defaults to delivering via SMTP to
> 127.0.0.1...
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jason Haar
No fetchmail. I use an
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:14:15PM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> bounce back to our server and be scanned a second time. But when I look at
> the headers of the test message there is only one "Received: " qmail-scanner
> entry (the inbound one) when there should be two. Now, if I
>
> Huh? I'm sorry, but I do expect you to understand how Qmail works before
> using Qmail-Scanner! That is an EXAMPLE of how you can use it.
>
Ouch!
> As it says:
>
> /etc/tcpserver/smtp.rules
> #
> # No Qmail-Scanner at all for mail from 127.0.0.1
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQ
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Anthony Baratta
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]tcp.smtp question
>
>
> At 12:56 PM 7/22/2002, Cert
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:56:22PM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I'm trying to convert to the Q-S standard of setting QMAILQUEUE from
> tcp.smtp file. According to the Q-S website:
>
> # No Qmail-Scanner at all for mail from 127.0.0.1
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQ
At 12:56 PM 7/22/2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
>I'm trying to convert to the Q-S standard of setting QMAILQUEUE from
>tcp.smtp file. According to the Q-S website:
>
># No Qmail-Scanner at all for mail from 127.0.0.1
>127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qma
I'm trying to convert to the Q-S standard of setting QMAILQUEUE from
tcp.smtp file. According to the Q-S website:
# No Qmail-Scanner at all for mail from 127.0.0.1
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
"
When I do this my outgoing mail (relayed from a dia
12 matches
Mail list logo
