ou think of anything else that this might break?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:43 AM
> To: Jeremy Kusnetz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Trying to daemonize uvscan thro
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:01 PM
>
> Actually I'm now looking at the uvscan docs, it seems by
> adding --mime and --mailbox to uvscan it should handle the
> unpacked email by itself. Maybe these should be added
> Actually I'm now looking at the uvscan docs, it seems by
> adding --mime and --mailbox to uvscan it should handle the
> unpacked email by itself. Maybe these should be added to
> qmail-scanner itself? Also qmail-scanner sets the --secure
> option, which activates --unzip, so should --unzip
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:01 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Trying to daemonize
> uvscan through spamd
>
> Actually I'm now l
> you are daemonizing a command line call? it's still a command line
> scanner. a daemonized uvscan would be one that loads virus defs into
> memory, and a message is piped through it... this is how spamc/spamd
> works. i guess i dont see what you are gaining by doing this?
Okay, so I'm not
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Kusnetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:29 PM
>
> I've been running with virus scanning through uvscan and spam
> scanning with spamassassin with no problems.
>
> I would now like to move to where both virus and spam
> scann
Hello,
I've been running with virus scanning through uvscan and spam scanning with
spamassassin with no problems.
I would now like to move to where both virus and spam scanning are done on
servers other then the server qmail is running on. This is easy with
spamassassin's spamd and spamc. But u
