Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

2004-07-29 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:29:59 +0300 (EEST) Nerijus Baliunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? > It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem > with latest 3.0.0 pre The problem was that I ran spamd -L -x -d (-L means "Use local tes

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

2004-07-26 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:06:46 +0200 Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of qmail-scanner (st) are you using? Your latest st (q-s-1.22st-20040606). > But these are the standard 2.63 URI rules. I also have these, but I want to use SpamCopURI, it is very effective. See http:

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

2004-07-26 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 13:29 +0300 26-07-2004, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: Hello, Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem with latest 3.0.0 pre (which includes this functionality, and there is loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL in /e

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

2004-07-26 Thread Nerijus Baliunas
Hello, Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem with latest 3.0.0 pre (which includes this functionality, and there is loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre). On another system,