On [05/04/2004], Niek Baakman wrote:
>
> It probably is Nelson.
> Just for stats sake, how many emails does your server handle per second, or
> per minute ?
It's well over the 150 mark. I suppose that most of it is virus and
spam.
>
> Regards,
> Niek Baakman
> --
>
> The greatest trick
Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
On [05/04/2004], Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
[snip]
Well, I managed to fix the problem. It was a permission problem in
/usr/local/share/clamav, it had clamav:clamav when it should have
qscand:qmail :).
Thanks to everyone who helped me in this time of need ;)
On [05/04/2004], Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
>
>
[snip]
Well, I managed to fix the problem. It was a permission problem in
/usr/local/share/clamav, it had clamav:clamav when it should have
qscand:qmail :).
Thanks to everyone who helped me in this time of need ;).
load average: 1.00,
On [05/04/2004], Will Saxon wrote:
>
> Have you set up the clamav databases, etc.?
>
> I found that I had this happen all the time with the latest 'stable' version
> of clamav on FreeBSD 5.2.1. However, when I used the clamav-devel port
> (clamav 20040321 snapshot) I did not have the problem anym
On [05/04/2004], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> in qmail-scanner-queue.pl, set the path to clamscan to use clamdscan. many
> orders of magnitude faster than plain clamscan. you'll of course need to
> set up the clamd daemon first.
>
>
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> http://www.anastrophe.com
>
Forgot t
> I did this following your sugestions and got the following errors
> while procesing messages:
>
> clamscan: corrupt or unknown ClamAV scanner error or
> memory/resource/perms problem
> - exit status 2
>
> I did a google search on the error and found that a person fixed a
> simil
On [05/04/2004], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> in qmail-scanner-queue.pl, set the path to clamscan to use clamdscan. many
> orders of magnitude faster than plain clamscan. you'll of course need to
> set up the clamd daemon first.
>
>
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> http://www.anastrophe.com
>
>
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Nelson D. Guerrero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]CPU Hog
>
>
> On [05/04/2004], Christian Lyra wrote:
> > hi,
> >
>
On [05/04/2004], Christian Lyra wrote:
> hi,
>
> are you runnind the clamav daemon?
>
I'm actually not running the daemon. I followed a web install and it
didn't mention me running the daemon. I suppose that clamscan runs
when qmail-scanner invokes it.
--
nelsong; (gre
hi,
are you runnind the clamav daemon?
On Monday 05 April 2004 15:03, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have a little machine running Qmail+Vpopmail+Qmail-Scanner+ClamAV for
> little over 14,000 people.
>
> I started using qmail-scanner last Friday and am having problems with
At 11:03 AM 4/5/2004, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
--scanner clamscan
--notify none
--add-dscr-hdrs no
--archive 0 --lang es_ES
--log-details syslog (I've switched this from syslog to "no" without
good results)
--admin virusadmin
Can anybody give me information on what might be going on
Hello List,
I have a little machine running Qmail+Vpopmail+Qmail-Scanner+ClamAV for little
over 14,000 people.
I started using qmail-scanner last Friday and am having problems with
CPU usage. The machine is a dual PIII 800MHz, 512MB ram, 1 120G WD hdd
and 1 20G Seagate hdd, running Slackware 9.
12 matches
Mail list logo
