I made a slight modification to my Qmail-Scanner perl file to create
a CSV summary after the run completes - here's my perl code (note,
I'm not a perl coder by day, or night):
# add to CSV file creating for analysis later
my $sa_csv = Text::CSV_XS->new;
my $input_fields = [$headers{'to'},
Salvatore,
When you create a user in vmailmgr that has a period in the
username (e.g. josh.trutwin) the IMAP directory becomes
josh:trutwin. I had this in my settings_per_domain.txt file for a
spamdir setting:
josh:trutwin/.SPAM
Unfortunately the colon character is used to split the email
accou
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:20:45 +0100
Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no problem on doing that for you, I don't really remember
> why I removed the '!' maybe because there are some checks about
> sa_subject and if it starts with a '!' some of the could be
> broken...
Do you
Hi,
I finally made the jump from 1.25 to 2.01 and decided this would be
a good time to also apply the qmail-scanner patch from Salvatore.
First off, this is excellent work, I will be sending a donation. I
did run into a few issues though, mainly with the
settings-per-domain option.
Here is a
Does anyone here know if qms-analog
(http://www.qms-analog.teel.ws) will ever be updated for version
2.01? I figured the author or someone else with info is probably
on this list.
Thanks,
Josh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. In
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:38:19 +0200
Jyri Hovila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My QSLA project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qsla/), which has
> also been quiet for a while, is waking up again.
> I'm hoping to release the new version within couple of weeks. I do
> not recommend using the old
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 07:16:05 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Trutwin wrote:
>
> >I hate these types of questions, but I have a couple servers still
> >on 1.23 and was thinking of upgrading to 1.24 but it's been a while
> >since a release s
I hate these types of questions, but I have a couple servers still on
1.23 and was thinking of upgrading to 1.24 but it's been a while since
a release so I thought I'd hold off if 1.25 is around the corner. I
made a few customizations so upgrading is a bit of a process and I'd
hate to do it twice
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 08:59:55 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Microsoft-Entourage is Outlook for Macintosh, I have some people
> using it with MacOS9. You can disable the EOL (end of line) check
> and the message will pass trough, at least if they are using MacOS9
> and maybe i
They are using a client called
Microsoft-Entourage (see below). Not sure how to turn this off in this client, never
used or even heard of it. Is there a way to configure qmail-scanner to let these
messages get through?
Josh
> Greets
> Christoph
>
> Josh Trutwin wrote:
&g
I have a user trying to send mail but qmail-scanner quarantines
because of bad MIME headers. I'm not sure what the problem is as I
don't have know the policies behind good MIME headers. Here are the
message headers (actual email addresses obfuscated):
Received: from [10.0.1.2] ([64.122.147.74])
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Jazzy Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's gone from perl 5.8.5.. any suggestions?
You can use the C wrapper in the contrib directory. Works pretty
well.
Josh
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0600
Dan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Through watching the logs, I noticed scanning of emails for delivery
> to users that don't exist on my system. And when a spammer decides
> to attach my domain with random email addresses, it really kills my
> system.
>
>
Ok,
I do have a post on the SA list on this as well, but I thought I'd try to tap other
expereinced QS+SA admins out there as the SA list hasn't produced any meaningful
responses.
If I run fast_spamassassin I get messages scanned in an acceptable amount of time
(using DNS tests, auto whitelist
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:22:57 -0400
"Jay Swackhamer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try running spamd with local tests only. SA might be trying to reach
> an RBL that's slow or offline, especially if you're using the
> default 2.63 settings. KIll spamd and run it with the -L option:
>
> > spamd -L -
I've been trying to tune a QS + SpamAssassing + ClamAV environment for about 100 users
- nothing too serious. But I find that scanning these messages is taking quite a long
time. On average about 45 seconds, sometimes as long as 200 seconds.
My configuration:
Server:
Dual P4 Xeon 2.4 Ghz - 1
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:56:48 +1200
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * reverted calling /usr/bin/suidperl back to the "official"
> way of
> doing suid perl: /usr/bin/perl
On my Debian woody installation I needed to use the c-wrapper for suid, I assume this
will still work ok
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:11:23 +0200
Max Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Trutwin wrote:
>
> >Can you throw up a phpinfo.php script somewhere?
> >
> >
> >
> >Josh
> >
> >
>
> Only available as .htm as my web is firewal
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:29:01 +0200
Max Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you might all have an idea about these missing graphs, then :)
>
> http://norddata.dk/images/qss.jpg
>
> Might be an issue about the gd library or php memory?? (got RH 7.3
> with gd 1.8.4-4 and php memorylimit set
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:59:37 -
"Steve Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> My QSS index.php is almost identical except that I modified the HTML
> so that it gets through W3C's HTML Validator and I still use an
> external config file, available here if anyone wants it:
>
> http://www.
Hey, thanks for the helpful links!
Josh
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:30:37 -0800
Rick Updegrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Trutwin wrote:
>
> > Has the developer of QSS given up? The 3.0 alpha version is dated fall of 2003
> > which only works with QS 1.16.
> >
Has the developer of QSS given up? The 3.0 alpha version is dated fall of 2003 which
only works with QS 1.16.
Does anyone have a patch to get QSS to work with 1.21 or do people use something else
to create online stats for QS?
Thanks,
Josh
---
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:02:08 -0800
David Lynum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering what other qmail-scanner users have done in dealing
> with spam that's sent to your webmaster account.
Spam is spam. Often times when they find an active domain, they'll start trying all
sorts of random
Off topic for some, but this is a good /. post on the effectiveness of clamav with
qmail - thought it would be interesting to this community.
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/03/2120227&mode=thread
Josh
---
This SF.Net email is sp
What version of PhP do you have? Looks like QSS is requiring php 4.3.0 or better now.
That function is not implemented in earlier versions of PhP.
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php
Josh
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:16:57 +0700
"T. Albert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hell
Hi list,
I'm wondering if 1.20 Final is coming out soon? It's been in RC for quite a while now
and I'm holding off my update until it's out of RC.
Thanks,
Josh
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://t
Excellent, thanks! This has been the one thing holding me back from going to qs
1.20rc3. Does it mean you have to wipe out the quaranteen log and start fresh though
or will qss still parse the pre-1.20rc3 log entries. (I'm guessing No, but thought
I'd check)
Josh
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:01:5
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:18:21 -0400
"Dan Didier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you update your AV dat files?
I have a cron job that runs freshclam every night. I'm runing 1.1.16 until the .20
goes out of rc. Soon I hope? Spamassassin is almost out of rc too, I've been waiting
to do them bot
On 22 Sep 2003 13:53:15 -0400
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone here figured out a way to prevent the newest worm from getting out on the
> net? (That e-mail thing with the MS update)
ClamAV doesn't seem to be catching it, so I added .exe to my list of quaranteened
attachments.
Josh
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 10:39:52 +0200
Pavel Lisy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> V Út, 09. 09. 2003 v 09:31, Davide Giunchi pí¨e:
> > (i've send this mail to the qs author, but as he doesn't respond i've sent it
> > here)
> >
> > This bug prevent qs from pass the recipient address to spamc via the -u
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:16:00 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That is the same problem I have been getting... I can see in the code
> where it is supposed to send the username, but it never does. It seems to
> always use qmailq or qmaild..
This is how I modded the script to get it to wo
> Isnt this what this in the CHANGES for rc1 is?
My bad, I haven't been paying attention to the 1.1.20rc posts.
> * SpamAssassin now sets the spamc "username" field to the recipient address.
> This only happens if there is ONE recipient. If a spammer sends a spam to 20
> local users in one SMTP
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:19:08 +0200
"Arno Slatius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran into the same problem. I think the problem lies with spamassassin
> because it queries the database for the settings of the user which is
> handling the mail at that moment. qmail-scanner runs as the qmailq user s
> > Is there a way qmail scanner can perform the above block of "TVqQAAMA" to
> > prevent anything that this list may miss?
> > AFAICT there doesn't seem to be.
> > Cheers.
Russell Nelson's qmail-smtpd patch does exactly this. It's in the Microsoft Virus
Prevention section of qmail.org.
Jo
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:18:28 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Welcome to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
> list!
>
> To post to this list, send your email to:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> General information about the mailing list is at:
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-sc
35 matches
Mail list logo
