On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 10:46 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> You can rely on your users to tell you when SA is down ;-)
Amen.
> Seriously, tools such as supervise from daemontools can help auto-
> restart services when they die. That'd keep SA running.
Clam has an annoying habit of hanging sometimes
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 14:18, Brian Ipsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I use qmail-scanner with verbose spamassassin. I am worried about
> > what will happen to the mail if spamassassin dies down. Will the mail
> > be bounced back?
>
> I have no idea what will happen - but why not run spamd under daemontool
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 14:58, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:07:40PM +1000, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> > There are some dis-advantages that should be considered, which don't
> > seem to have been noticed yet. Namely, *IF* a worm sent it's message
> > using the configured SMTP relay, and
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 06:32, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Jason Haar wrote:
> > However, a 550 bounce doesn't say
> > "jack" compared with what the custom-written alerts of Qmail-Scanner do...
>
> It doesn't matter. At least the user knows that his email didn't go through.
Yep. And that user will ev
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 07:07, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Yes, let's look at my actual issue:
>
> 4. I am a business customer, and I rely on email to do business. I send
> a word doc or a zipped binary attachment that just happens to contain
> a signature that looks an awful lot like a virus to a busi
On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 15:12, Clive Eisen wrote:
> Jason Haar wrote:
>
> >
> >Do you run clamd under daemontools? (as a supervise script). If so, stop it.
> >Run it as a rc-script instead. I have found and heard of so many problems
> >with memory leaks/etc that make clamd under daemontools a very b
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 02:50, Kalin Ivanov wrote:
> Have a problem here. A new type of SPAM is taking over my network. It's
> something like that:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? X_A_Nax ~ +S+oma + Pn.t.ermin ; At|v@'n Plus: X3nic'a|, Ambi3`n,
> S0naT`a, Fl3xer'il, Ce|`3brex, Fi0ric'3t, [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
Hello everyone,
I received a very obvious spam in my Inbox today, and I was surprised
that SpamAssassin's Bayes didn't catch it. Examining the headers
revealed that indeed Bayes was not consulted:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=1.5 tests=HTML_30_40,
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_MESSAGE autole
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 08:22, Zachary Denison wrote:
> I would like to add a feature of automatically moving
> messages marked with X-Spam-Status: Yes to a special
> junk-mail folder in each users directory. Can anyone
> give me any hints or pointers as to what I would need
> to modify to do that.
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 11:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Jonathan Tai wrote:
> > 2004-02-27 10:22:00.274873500 status: local 0/20 remote 0/40
> >
> > If the first number is 20/20 (or whatever your concurrencylocal is set
> > to), then your bottleneck
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the past few days, it seems my main mail server has reached a critical
> mass: it cannot scan incoming emails quickly enough to keep up with the
> demand. As a result, the CPU shoots through the roof and making smtp
> connections takes sev
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:47, Jeff Koch wrote:
> We're setting up a mailserver to do anti-virus filtering and would like to
> use ClamAV but we're concerned that it might not be as effective or the
> updates as timely as the commercial filters like McAfee or F-Secure. Has
> anyone setup both? Can
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 02:40, Technical Services wrote:
> This has happened twice so far, the 'working' directory of
> /var/spool/qmailscan takes up all the inodes on the partition a nd
> crashes the server.
Are you talking about the working directory (tmp) or the quarantine?
tmp should be cleaned
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 00:34, Christian Ista wrote:
> > freshclam is your friend, run it often.
>
> I run it every 2 hours. But no signatures for the viruses below.
>
> C.
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe clam calls this one "SomeFool" - it's been catching those
since about yesterday.
> >
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 05:25, Matt wrote:
> Well now it's finding it on all 3 of my mail servers when I checked this
> morning.
> It's almost like there is a lag between when the database updates and
> when qmail-scanner and clamdscan find it.
>
> My softlimit is set to... let me check here..
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
