Indeed. I rebuilt perl with suid support, and rebuilt Q-S, it
detected suid-perl, and it's been performing flawlessly so far.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> At 4:07 -0400 2-07-2009, Nicholas DeMarinis wrote:
>>
>> After running the test install s
At 4:07 -0400 2-07-2009, Nicholas DeMarinis wrote:
>After running the test install script again, everything in tmp is
>owned by root:root, the directories have permissions 750 and the files
>660.
That is really no good... So only root can access those files.
But I can't understand how this is hap
After running the test install script again, everything in tmp is
owned by root:root, the directories have permissions 750 and the files
660.
I had to set qmail-scanner-version.txt and quarantine-events.{db,txt}
to qmaild:nofiles. I couldn't say why that worked, nor could I tell
you how I got the
At 1:41 -0400 2-07-2009, Nicholas DeMarinis wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've just installed qmail-scanner-2.06 on top of netqmail-1.06. Q-S
>has successfully detected clamd 0.93.3 and spamd (fast) 3.2.5. It
>_appears_ to be functioning well when sending and receiving plain text
>email, but I find the follo
At 3:48 -0400 2-07-2009, Nicholas DeMarinis wrote:
>Tried that, to the same result. I set DEBUG to 101, but it didn't
>seem to output anything different.
>
Hi
After setting DEBUG to 101, Q-S doesn't delete the files/directories
in the /var/spool/qscan/tmp, so you can check the ownership and the
Tried that, to the same result. I set DEBUG to 101, but it didn't
seem to output anything different.
Anything else I can try before I rebuild perl for suid?
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> At 1:41 -0400 2-07-2009, Nicholas DeMarinis wrote:
>>
>>
