Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce] qmail-scanner-2.06-rc1 (new f-prot support)

2009-02-16 Thread Tomas Charvat
Well few facts. Fpscan is not deamonized and its detection time is 20x-100x slower that Clamav or Fpscand. It also double load of your server. Fpscand is running in single thread and quite often get stuck. I belive, that it can't handle huge traffic. (more that 10 emails per second) Clama

[Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce] qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2 (new f-prot support)

2009-02-16 Thread Jason Haar
Hi there Hopefully a final change has been made to the f-prot support. Can some f-prot users give this version a go, and if it sings, I'll release the final version of 2.06 http://qmail-scanner.sf.net/qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2.tgz http://qmail-scanner.sf.net/qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2.tgz Thanks -

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce] qmail-scanner-2.06-rc1 (new f-prot support)

2009-02-16 Thread Jason Haar
Arno Slatius wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, two enthusiastic thumbs up for including support for F-Prot 6. > I installed the new scanner on a backup MX for now. I do have some issues > which are fixable: > > The installer keeps 'detecting' the binary vars incorrect. I end up with > this: > my $