James Paige wrote:
>
> But as [EMAIL PROTECTED] said earlier, the bounces contain body text
> from actual valid e-mails that the users really did send out.
Oh - didn't see that. In that case, I'd say he's got a corrupt Qmail
system. Sounds like inodes are pointing to the wrong messages in the
que
Jason Haar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh, that would make some sense I suppose. The other week a ran one of
the queue rebuild scripts out there (queue-fix-1.4), but that didn't
seem to help. I guess our next option would be to delete the current
queue and just start from scratch. Eek.
I would look at the mail logs for the outbound connection.
So:
Step 1: Find bounced message in mail log
Step 2: identify IP/domain of bounce
Step 3: look for log entry of send to bounce domain
Step 4: Analyze findings
If you find no attempts to send the message that bounced, then it's likely
no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Huh, that would make some sense I suppose. The other week a ran one of
> the queue rebuild scripts out there (queue-fix-1.4), but that didn't
> seem to help. I guess our next option would be to delete the current
> queue and just start from scratch. Eek.
I think you are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh, that would make some sense I suppose. The other week a ran one of
the queue rebuild scripts out there (queue-fix-1.4), but that didn't
seem to help. I guess our next option would be to delete the current
queue and just start from scratch. Eek.
Joost B. de Niet w
At 13:53 -0400 17-08-2005, Steve Dimoff wrote:
> -Original Message-
From: Steve Dimoff
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 1:39 PM
To: Salvatore Toribio; Steve Dimoff; Yuval Lieberman; qmail-scanner-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Delay's in processing mail
>
At 13:53 -0400 17-08-2005, Steve Dimoff wrote:
> -Original Message-
From: Steve Dimoff
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 1:39 PM
To: Salvatore Toribio; Steve Dimoff; Yuval Lieberman; qmail-scanner-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Delay's in processing mail
>
