At 13:53 -0400 17-08-2005, Steve Dimoff wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
From: Steve Dimoff
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 1:39 PM
To: Salvatore Toribio; Steve Dimoff; Yuval Lieberman; qmail-scanner-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Delay's in processing mail
>
> HI Steve
>
> Are the sever and the client in the same LAN? It could be a
> transmition issue...
>
> Regards
>
> Salvatore
Hey Salvatore! First off, thanks for taking the time to respond to this
issue.
Yes, the server and client are in the same LAN.
Thanks,
> Steve
When I comment all the debugging levels in the QS file, it looks like when
it's parsing each line of the file is when it's taking up the most time.
Hi Steve
I ran a couple of tests sending the same message without
qmail-scanner and with qmail-scanner and the times are similar, I am
in a 10 Mb LAN with and a 5 year old Macintosh, the server is a 100
Mb trunk, today I am the only person using the LAN. I sent a mp3 file
of 4.3 Mb.
2005-08-18 10:47:09.825921500 tcpserver-st07: status: 1/20
2005-08-18 10:47:09.826021500 32320 tcpserver: from 193.43.129.200
2005-08-18 10:47:09.826074500 32320 tcpserver: ok 0:193.43.129.146:25
:193.43.129.200::53651
2005-08-18 10:47:11.583870500 32320 smtpd-st11: mailfrom_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _to_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-08-18 10:47:31.867090500 32320 tcpserver: end status 0
2005-08-18 10:47:31.867092500 tcpserver-st07: status: 0/20
Elapsed time without qmail-scanner: 31.867092500 - 09.825921500 = 22.04117100
2005-08-18 10:48:41.043853500 tcpserver-st07: status: 1/20
2005-08-18 10:48:41.043942500 32369 tcpserver: from 193.43.129.200
2005-08-18 10:48:41.043996500 32369 tcpserver: ok 0:193.43.129.146:25
:193.43.129.200::53652
2005-08-18 10:48:42.063808500 32369 smtpd-st11: mailfrom_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _to_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-08-18 10:49:01.168058500 32369 tcpserver: end status 0
2005-08-18 10:49:01.168060500 tcpserver-st07: status: 0/20
Elapsed time with qmail-scanner: 61.168060500 - 41.043853500 = 20.12420700
Qmail-scanner time: 18.710641
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:48:42 CEST:32370/32369: +++ starting debugging
for process 32370 (ppid=32369) by uid=81
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: w_c: message size 6246378 bytes
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: w_c: elapsed time from
start 17.904059 secs
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369:
return-path='[EMAIL PROTECTED]', recips='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: from='Salvatore Toribio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', subj='TEST big attach', via SMTP from
193.43.129.200
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: s_p_d: rcpt match
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', scanners
'sophie_scanner,spamassassin,perlscan_scanner'
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: sophie: finished scan in
0.240822 secs
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: SA: message too big - skip it
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: p_s: finished scan in 0.011542 secs
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: ini_sc: finished scan of
"/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/apo146.aaaaa.it112435492272232370"...
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:49:00 CEST:32370/32369: ------ Process
32370/32369 finished. Total of 18.710641 secs
I guess that the rblsmtpd check takes nearly 2 seconds.
Maybe the smtp protocol it is not very fast....
Regards
Salvatore
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
