Huh, that would make some sense I suppose. The other week a ran one of
the queue rebuild scripts out there (queue-fix-1.4), but that didn't
seem to help. I guess our next option would be to delete the current
queue and just start from scratch. Eek.
Joost B. de Niet wrote:
Hi,
I have seen st
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Dimoff
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 1:39 PM
> To: Salvatore Toribio; Steve Dimoff; Yuval Lieberman; qmail-scanner-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Delay's in processing mail
>
> >
> > HI Steve
> >
> > Are the sever and th
>
> HI Steve
>
> Are the sever and the client in the same LAN? It could be a
> transmition issue...
>
> Regards
>
> Salvatore
Hey Salvatore! First off, thanks for taking the time to respond to this
issue.
Yes, the server and client are in the same LAN.
Thanks,
Steve
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a new version of q-s boiling?
I mean any bugfixes or new features over 1.25 ?
Regards,
Maciej
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA *
Hi,
I have not had tnef installed before installing q-s.
No I do have it.
Do I have to reconfigure and reinstall q-s to have q-s use
tnef or not?
I am referring to tnef mentioned on the website:
"Can decode those annoying MS-TNEF MIME attachments that Microsoft
mail servers just love to use. If y
Hi,
I have seen strange things like this before when I had a corrupted
queue in qmail.
Bye,
Joost de Niet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess my next question would be on any advice for debugging this
> problem. We can't tell if it's qmail, qmail-scanner, or something else,
> but we can tell
I guess my next question would be on any advice for debugging this
problem. We can't tell if it's qmail, qmail-scanner, or something else,
but we can tell that we have a very angry hosting client. :-)
Aaron Carr wrote:
Are you sure it's even caused by the user sending mail?
Keep in mind that
I'm not dismissing that idea. However, the bounces (as shown below)
include the email that the valid user was sending out.
This is a VERY strange problem. And it's scaring our users (naturally),
since they wonder if the wrong people are getting copies of their mail.
Aaron Carr wrote:
Are yo
At 11:07 -0400 17-08-2005, Steve Dimoff wrote:
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:57:00 EDT:2219: found C-T attachment filename test.wmv
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:57:00 EDT:2219: w_c: attachment 5: Content-Type of
video/x-ms-wmv found
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:57:30 EDT:2219: w_c: rename new msg from
/var/spool/qmailscan/
Here are some results:
SYSTEM - 1
Hardware: Sun E250 - 2 X UltraSPARC-II 400MHz
Memory: 2Gigs
OS: Solaris 10
Perl version 5.8.5
QS: 1.25 - st - patch - 20050207
Test File Size: 1.26MB
Time to process: 35.972442 secs
Hang up:
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:57:00 EDT:2219: found C-T attachment filename test.
I'm using QS 1.25 st-20050406.
can someone from the list who is using SQ1.25 WITHOUT the st patch
check if there is a delay, so we can see if its a bug in the st patch?
Thanks, Yuval.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Dimoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yuval Lieberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have the exact same problem.
> I'm using RH EL3.
> is this a bug??
> Yuval.
I'm running QS - 1.25 - st - patch - 20050207, what about you?
Steve
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2
I have the exact same problem.
I'm using RH EL3.
is this a bug??
Yuval.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Dimoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:50 PM
Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Delay's in processing mail
Hey Folks,
I'm hoping someone can help me out
13 matches
Mail list logo
