Hi Erik,
I am not using procmail and vpopmail there, but a cyrus imap.
The method should work too: all deliveries are via a .qmail file that calls a
delivery script.
Now the delivery script calls SA and pipes the output (with SA markup added)
into the
cyrus deliver mechanism
Wolfgang
-
On Monday 11 April 2005 21:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Try it, and you will see in the log that spamassassin is runned for
> each recipient. don't enable debug and you will have a clear log like
> this:
Thanks. Now I got it. Another big part is in the 'sub-patch-st.pl' and I
missed that befor
On Monday 11 April 2005 21:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SA is now called before a mail is delivered to a user's box
How do you do this? Maybe this is an alternative for me in the way you
do it. Are you using procmail for this?
--
So long... Fuzz
>>
>> I know I'm barking to the wrong tree but I'm a little bit frustated and
>> I want to talk about my problems. B-)
>>
>>
>> So far so good. '/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log' shows me the
>> following loglines (among other lines):
>>
>> > g_e_h: return-path is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", r
On Monday 11 April 2005 18:56, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> http://toribio.apollinare.org/qmail-scanner/
>
> Read carefully the docs and enable settings-per-domain, you need
to
> add at least one entry (i.e. just your installed scanners for one
> domain) in the settings_per_domain.txt and generate t
On Monday 11 April 2005 18:56, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> http://toribio.apollinare.org/qmail-scanner/
>
> Read carefully the docs and enable settings-per-domain, you need to
> add at least one entry (i.e. just your installed scanners for one
> domain) in the settings_per_domain.txt and generate t
At 18:35 +0200 11-04-2005, Erik Wasser wrote:
On Monday 11 April 2005 18:12, you wrote:
All of this is confuse..
I'm sorry about that. I hope I can myself clear with this message. B-)
Are you asking for checking spamassassin for each user in a multiple
rcpt-to message?
Yes. That is my problem. '
On Monday 11 April 2005 18:12, you wrote:
> All of this is confuse..
I'm sorry about that. I hope I can myself clear with this message. B-)
> Are you asking for checking spamassassin for each user in a multiple
> rcpt-to message?
Yes. That is my problem. 'multiple rcpt-to messages' are not chec
At 17:54 +0200 11-04-2005, Erik Wasser wrote:
On Monday 11 April 2005 17:54, you wrote:
I believe it will fall back to the SA global defaults as configured
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or where ever yours happens to
be). Make sure it has the required_hits defined and how you want the
sub
On Monday 11 April 2005 17:54, you wrote:
> I believe it will fall back to the SA global defaults as configured
> in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or where ever yours happens to
> be). Make sure it has the required_hits defined and how you want the
> subject line changed.
Thanks for the answer
Hello list,
I know I'm barking to the wrong tree but I'm a little bit frustated and
I want to talk about my problems. B-)
Imagine the following SMTP dialog:
> % telnet mail.foobar.invalid 25
> Trying w.x.y.z...
> Connected to mail.foobar.invalid.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 SPONTS v2.0.12
Oops.. sorry. That one was supposed to be sent to the SA-list.
Arvinn
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. S
I have two questions about the SPF plugin in SA.
What is the difference between FAIL and SOFTFAIL on Helo? When running
SA with bayes and network FAIL scores close to zero while SOFTFAIL gives
a solid 3.1. Does FAIL hit a lot of ham? According to my stats,
SPF_HELO_FAIL gets triggered about as o
13 matches
Mail list logo
