Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]QS Performance / Milage / Volume / Tuning

2005-02-06 Thread Bookworm
Cody Baker wrote: A year and a half ago we put two qmail-scanner machines in our lineup, handling around 100,000 messages per day. The second was mainly for redundancy. We're now netting on average 400,000 messages per day and our two machines are just barely hanging on for the ride. We've go

Re[2]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-06 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:06:09 +1300 - Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I failed to mention that I'm running gentoo linux. I installed > > with the command: > > emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner > Oh - I was totally unaware GenToo was packaging Qmail-Scanner (gee, > thanks guys

Re[2]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-06 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:06:09 +1300 - Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner > You will have to talk to them I'm afraid. As they have "packaged" Q-S, > and apparently it isn't the same as the "real" Q-S - you will need to > talk to them as to what is wrong.

[Qmail-scanner-general]QS Performance / Milage / Volume / Tuning

2005-02-06 Thread Cody Baker
A year and a half ago we put two qmail-scanner machines in our lineup, handling around 100,000 messages per day. The second was mainly for redundancy. We're now netting on average 400,000 messages per day and our two machines are just barely hanging on for the ride. We've got new hardware on

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-06 Thread Jason Haar
David Sperling wrote: Sorry, I failed to mention that I'm running gentoo linux. I installed with the command: emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner Oh - I was totally unaware GenToo was packaging Qmail-Scanner (gee, thanks guys). You will have to talk to them I'm afraid. As they have "packaged

[Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S --log-details syslog not working

2005-02-06 Thread Ying Meng Tan
Hi,   I have tested both Q-S 1.24st and Q-S 1.24 on my SuSE Linux 9.1 box to log Q-S activities to syslog.   Though there's no error shown, no activity is logged to the /var/log/messages.   What can be the cause of it?   Thanks!   Regards, YM Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Se

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-06 Thread David Sperling
Thanks for the very quick reply! Jason Haar wrote: David Sperling wrote: / test_installation.sh */ I ran ./test_installation.sh -doit as root: and email 1,3,4 worked as expected. email 1 came through as normal. * emali 2 was simply not blocked. email 3 was blocked. email 4 had

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_installation

2005-02-06 Thread Jason Haar
David Sperling wrote: / test_installation.sh */ I ran ./test_installation.sh -doit as root: and email 1,3,4 worked as expected. email 1 came through as normal. * emali 2 was simply not blocked. email 3 was blocked. email 4 had X-spam tags in the header OK -good. When I send ma

[Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_installation

2005-02-06 Thread David Sperling
Hi- I'm having trouble getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_installation script. I'm running * qmail-scanner : 1.24 * ucspi-tcp: 0.88-r9 * qmail: 1.03-r13 * clamav: 0.81 * vpopmail: 5.4.6-r1 * gentoo linux / test_installation.sh */ I ran ./test_installat