[Qmail-scanner-general]patch for nod32 single user....

2005-01-25 Thread Giuliano Natali (el Diaolin)
This is a patch for qmail-scanner-1.24-st... If anyone needs it... Ciao, Diaolin -- Nel 1968 la potenza operativa di 2 C-64 hanno portato un razzo sulla luna. Oggi la potenza operativa di un Athlon 3000+ viene usata per far girare X?Qualcosa deve essere andato storto Diaolin Common subdirecto

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-25 Thread Arnvid Karstad
Hello, On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:30:11 +0100 - "Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there a possibility to have the SpamAssassin headers in every mail > and not moving the sa headers to something like: > X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status I've noticed the

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-25 Thread Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salvatore Toribio said the following: > Hi I don't understand your question. Can you explain it? Well, using spamassassin-fast (-c) qmail-scanner inserts the X-Spam-Status Header but no information about why this mail is spam. If I don't use "-c" (aka

[Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-25 Thread Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, is there a possibility to have the SpamAssassin headers in every mail and not moving the sa headers to something like: X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status I could uncomment the line which moves the headers in qmail-scanner-queue.pl but does it bre