[Qmail-scanner-general]Plesk 7.X

2004-11-26 Thread Justin Fielding
Anyone here have the disability of using plesk? I may have some useful info if you want to be able to recompile/patch qmail. Justin. --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products fr

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]no sender and no recips / Qmail dropping message

2004-11-26 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 9:10 + 26-11-2004, Ewan Bain wrote: Jason Haar wrote: Ewan Bain wrote: I found this in the qmail scanner file : #At the very least this is supposed to be $env_returnpath='F' - so #qmail-smtpd must be officially dropping the incoming message for #some (valid) reason (including the other end d

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]no sender and no recips / Qmail dropping message

2004-11-26 Thread Ewan Bain
Jason Haar wrote: Ewan Bain wrote: I found this in the qmail scanner file : #At the very least this is supposed to be $env_returnpath='F' - so #qmail-smtpd must be officially dropping the incoming message for #some (valid) reason (including the other end dropping the connection). So i'm now thinkin

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Kaspersky AVPLinux scanner

2004-11-26 Thread Martynas
I'm interested in Q-S + avescanner too ;) (from KAV 5.0.x). regards, Martynas > Jason Haar wrote: > >> I see there appears to be a newer version of AVP out there now that >> Q-S doesn't work with >> >> Can the AVP users out there get back to us via this list if the >> changes Mandy <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Kaspersky AVPLinux scanner

2004-11-26 Thread Mandy
Jason Haar wrote: I see there appears to be a newer version of AVP out there now that Q-S doesn't work with Can the AVP users out there get back to us via this list if the changes Mandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made are appropriate - so that the Q-S module can be updated. Contrary to popular belief