On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:11:32AM -0400, Vee Persaud wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had a solution to the following problem that I
> get when I do a 'make test' for qmail-scanner-1.22. I'm on a Solaris 9 box
> and this is what I get:
>
> unix passed to setlogsock, but path not available at /
What OS ? I'm running on Solaris 9.
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]setlogsock issue installin
I found these lines in my qmail-queue.log:
.
.
.
Tue, 18 May 2004 17:47:04 -0300:9909: ini_sc: scanning message took 0.003026
seconds
Tue, 18 May 2004 17:47:04 -0300:9909: q_r: fork off child into
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue...
Tue, 18 May 2004 17:47:04 -0300:9913: q_r: xstatus=0
Tue, 18 May 2004 1
On Wed May 19 2004 12:46 pm, root linux wrote:
hmm.. if it is any consolation, and i dont know if anyone else experienced
this, but our incoming attempted mail volume increased at least 100% or more
this past week. it is starting to level back off a bit now though. to be
honest. i personally thi
I´m recieving messages that contain zero byte attachments (especialy .zip)
which make it appear as virus emails but they are empty. 0 in
quarantine-attachments.txt
indicates all sizes.
How can I block zero byte attachments?
Att. Osmar Klock
On Wed May 19 2004 12:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes. i asked that question in a msg that has not come through yet but will
beat this one.:) my original msg was faulty in that it assumed someone
running a > 700mhz machine with a decent amount of ram. I corrected myself in
asking about the h
This is an Intel P3 1GHz with 256MB of RAM
But it performed ok since this week...bad things
happened, :(
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed May 19 2004 11:54 am, root linux wrote:
> hmm. odd. i am going to top-answer this one due to
> its length. tail the queue
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Chuck
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]setlogsock issue installing
> qmail-scanner
>
>
> On Wed May 19 2004 11:27 am, Vee Persaud wr
On Wed May 19 2004 11:54 am, root linux wrote:
hmm. odd. i am going to top-answer this one due to its length. tail the queue
log and see if you can manually notice the delay. according to the av scanner
it only took .5 secs to complete its scan yet the entire thing took 11
seconds? very odd. the
At 07:17 AM 5/19/2004, Chuck wrote:
first examine message headers. At the end of the qmail-scanner-queue entry
will be a process time. with only a few exceptions it should NEVER exceed 0.3
seconds. If it does, look for reasons why it is being delayed in the external
processes.
what metric are you b
I'm using a patch someone put out which allows you to designate an email
address to deliver the caught spam to.
I will try to find the link.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 9:18 PM
Subject: [Qmail-scanne
Ok, I changed it to -t 30 and will monitor it...
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jamie Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep, thats the one.. I would just do a tail -f on
> the
> /var/spool/qmailscanner/qmail-queue.log file just
> watch it as mail
> flows.. you should be able to see where it's slowing
Here is the mail message header: -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 15388 invoked by uid 504); 19 May
2004 15:34:13 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.example.com
by uid 501 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (ehost Clear:.
Processed in 11.09636
On Wed May 19 2004 11:27 am, Vee Persaud wrote:
> I'm using Perl 5.8.0
>
> I saw on the archive from 2002 that Perl 5.8 and Q-S are not compatible.
> Is it still not compatible ???
wer are using 5.8.2 with it just fine. i believe we also used 5.8.0 previously
with no trouble. not 100% sure of
Where can I change the default timeout?
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jason Staudenmayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the default time-out? If you can set it
> change it to 5 sec. This help
> me with my setup.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: root linux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
Is it the below setting in
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl?
#Want debugging? Enable this and read
$scandir/qmail-queue.log
my $DEBUG='1';
I am monitoring /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log
and I can't see any error message. Or what messages
should I monitor?
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jami
Ok, I did not have spam processing...only have a/v
processing and rblsmtpd sbl.spamhaus.org checking.
I did not set quarantine notification to anybody.
I will examine on the message headers as you
suggested.
Thank you.
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed May 19 20
I'm using Perl 5.8.0
I saw on the archive from 2002 that Perl 5.8 and Q-S are not compatible. Is it still
not compatible ???
Thx
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Beh
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a solution to the following problem that I get when I do
a 'make test' for qmail-scanner-1.22. I'm on a Solaris 9 box and this is what I get:
unix passed to setlogsock, but path not available at /dev/fd/3 line 84
I saw this on the archives, but no solution. A
On Wed May 19 2004 09:31 am, root linux wrote:
honestly that doesn't look at all unusual to me if you receive a lot of email.
our process list is almost triple that all the time. however there is one
thing you should do, since you could be bottled up in either a/v processing,
spam processing or
have you tried to turn DEBUG on in qmail-scanner-queue.pl, and watch the
qmail-queue.log?
root linux wrote:
Yep, lots of mails but why the qmail-scanner-queue.pl
takes a long time to exit?
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jamie Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure.. are you receiving lots of email at
I am running RBL pointing to "rblsmtpd -r
relays.ordb.org" and no SpamAssassin running.
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jason Staudenmayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you running spamassassin? Rbl time-outs might be
> the cause.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: root linux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
I don't have "qmailctl"
Here is what I run?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# service qmail stat
messages in queue: 16
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]#
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jason Staudenmayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> qmailctl stat
>
> How full is your queue?
>
Yep, lots of mails but why the qmail-scanner-queue.pl
takes a long time to exit?
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Jamie Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure.. are you receiving lots of email at once
> on that server?
> enable DEBUG in qmail-scanner-queue.pl and watch
> /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-
Not sure.. are you receiving lots of email at once on that server?
enable DEBUG in qmail-scanner-queue.pl and watch
/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log for any errors; or try netstat -ant
to see active connections...
do any of them go away, or do they just keep building up? if the latter,
som
Hi all,
I have lots of the below process running when I run
"ps -ef" at the command prompt, is it normal?
Btw, I am running Red Hat 7.2 with qmail 1.03 and
qmail-scanner 1.16
qmaild6407 5946 0 21:12 pts/000:00:00
qmail-smtpd
qmailq6408 6407 0 21:12 pts/000:00:00
/usr/bin/suid
26 matches
Mail list logo
