Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-scanner compile option - no suid

2004-05-16 Thread Bookworm
Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 08:56:19PM -0500, Bookworm wrote: Problem #1 - the compile, rather than just saying "You don't have SUID Perl, do you want to continue, Y/N" (which, to me, would make sense), simply dies - as if, of course, everyone wants to have suid. (yes, I know a

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-scanner compile option - no suid

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 08:56:19PM -0500, Bookworm wrote: > Problem #1 - the compile, rather than just saying "You don't have SUID > Perl, do you want to continue, Y/N" (which, to me, would make sense), > simply dies - as if, of course, everyone wants to have suid. (yes, I > know about the --sk

[Qmail-scanner-general]Quarantining spam

2004-05-16 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi Jason: I'd like to have qmail-scanner quarantine spam also. If I set $quarantine_event='spam' in the spamassassin routine will that do the trick or are there other complications? Thanks, Jeff Koch --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: S

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-scanner compile option - no suid

2004-05-16 Thread Bookworm
This is primarily for Jason Haar, but could be for anyone. I run Slackware - meaning suid perl doesn't exist without a full compile from source. (I have zero problems with this. I prefer it. ) What this means is needing the wrapper from the contrib directory. (not a problem to build either) P

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]missed detection

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:38:50AM -0500, McKeever Chris wrote: > For some reason there are some files that should be flagged for DISALLOWED that dont > get picked up, and are in fact viruses and our second > tier scanner finds it...any suggestions? Who knows what is slipping through both > .

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]clamav-0.7 qmailscanner-1.22

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:37:36PM +0200, Enrico valsecchi wrote: > Good! > I'm happy for having solved your problem! > I have put 10 days into this > I'm write some email at qmail-scanner-lists, 2 email at J.H. > but nobody has answered to me! (Except J. Staudenmayer ) > > Slowly slowly

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Re: RE: SMTP error code

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:47:07AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > clicks on the .eml attachment - and gets infected... > > I don't think that's a valid argument. If the user's mail server is AV protected > then the mail server won't deliver an infected email in the first place. If the !!! But

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]RE: SMTP error code

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:24:54AM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > I specifically said 're-attach'. I did not say 'append in plain text'. > I'd love to see an end user get base64 into an executable to infect > themselves from an appended bounce message. > ... > > Nothing I work with seems to m

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]1.22 wont recognize Clam 0.70

2004-05-16 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:43:27AM -0500, McKeever Chris wrote: > >You need to run: > > > >{qmailscanner-home}/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z > > > >to re-initialize version information... > > THAT did the trick! Thanks - it looks like this also fixed some issues with things > 'slipping by' that I ha