Hi guys/girls,
Thanks for your assistance with netqmail and
qmail-scanner. Everything appears to be working nicely now.
One last couple of questions. For qmail-scanner,
should spamd be running as root or should I perhaps run it as user
"qscand".
Also is it normal to have the following in my
Jesús Arnáiz said:
> I'm experiencing some new problems with QS (qmail + clamav +
> qmail-qfilter + spamassassin on FreeBSD).
>
> It seems to works fine with local mails, but mail which comes from
> outside (other servers) never arrives and there is no error to the
> sender or anything.
>
> If I pu
Hi.
I'm experiencing some new problems with QS (qmail + clamav +
qmail-qfilter + spamassassin on FreeBSD).
It seems to works fine with local mails, but mail which comes from
outside (other servers) never arrives and there is no error to the
sender or anything.
If I put off QS (changing QMAILQ
I just moved my
primary qmail server to a new box. The old one was a dual 1.4ghz p3 setup,
the new one is a single 2.8ghz xeon. I figured it would handle the spamd
load either the same or better. Well so far its WORST. It like pegs
my cpu out all day long. I'm running spamd with these
Ah brilliant ! It's working !
Thanks so much Rick and Salvatore ! Seems to be working very well.
Kindest regards
David Wilson
D c D a t a
Tel +27 33 342 7003
Fax +27 33 345 4155
Cell +27 83 267 7500
http://www.dcdata.co.za
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KZN's first and only pure Linux solut
True. Thanks Rick.
No sweat.
Kindest regards
David Wilson
D c D a t a
Tel +27 33 342 7003
Fax +27 33 345 4155
Cell +27 83 267 7500
http://www.dcdata.co.za
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KZN's first and only pure Linux solution provider
Li
David Wilson wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
The only problem I have so far is that I seem to be picking issue with
headers though.
If I telnet to port 25 on my netqmail server, and issue the following:
helo mail.mydomain.com
mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
data
Testing
.
I get the f
On [06/04/2004], Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's entirely possible that the QMAILQUEUE patch is already in netqmail,
> I don't know as I have never used it.
Yes, this is correct. I've done several instalations of netqmail +
qmail-scanner and not once have I needed to install this pa
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for your reply.
That appears to be true.
Looking at messages passed into my netqmail with qmail-scanner installed,
messages seem to be getting passed to qmail-scanner without the QMAILQUEUE
patch.
The only problem I have so far is that I seem to be picking issue with
headers
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
I don't think so.
From the netqmail page "We have fixed only those things which are
out-and-out wrong, or which have been approved by djb (specifically
QMAILQUEUE)."
Salvatore
Hi,
It's entirely possible that the QMAILQUEUE patch is already in netqmail,
I don't know
At 9:06 -0400 6-04-2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
David Wilson wrote:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your reply and guidance, greatly appreciated.
I will try out what you have suggested.
Do I still need to apply the QMAILQUEUE patch though ?
Hi,
Yes you do still need the qmailqueue patch.
Regards,
Rick
I
Ah ok, thanks I will try apply it now and see what happens.
Thank you for your help so far.
Kindest regards
David Wilson
D c D a t a
Tel +27 33 342 7003
Fax +27 33 345 4155
Cell +27 83 267 7500
http://www.dcdata.co.za
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KZN's first and only pure Linux solution
David Wilson wrote:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your reply and guidance, greatly appreciated.
I will try out what you have suggested.
Do I still need to apply the QMAILQUEUE patch though ?
Hi,
Yes you do still need the qmailqueue patch.
Regards,
Rick
---
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your reply and guidance, greatly
appreciated.
I will try out what you have
suggested.
Do I still need to apply the QMAILQUEUE patch
though ?
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmail Scanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Satu
14 matches
Mail list logo
