On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:16:16 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't want to see another 30K of perl added for such a simple
> thing. Don't forget, EACH instance of Q-S would have to load that 30K worth
> of code - just to get around a problem with find. (that's why I'd rather fork
> a stand
I would guess that what he's talking about is that SUID is not a default.
For example, with Red Hat Linux 9, I had to install the perl-suidperl rpm
file in order for QS to work. Not a big deal, and certainly not the fault
of QS.
Aaron
Jason Haar said:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:40:46PM -0400,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:51:34PM +0300, Fabrice LABORIE wrote:
> when a virus is caught, it seems that qmail-scanner is still trying to
> inject a notification mail to "<>".
> ...
> Is this a known bug or do I have something broken in my set up ?
What bug? It sent an email to "<>"? It may not
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:55:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my perl program to handle the find cleanup
> parts of qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z. The first version, if the
> /var/spool/qmailscan directory had not been updated in a day, went ahead
> and deleted
Is there a way to execute a script within qmail? I'm familiar with the
sendmail/smrsh method, and the .qmail file, but these *replace* delivery. I
want to execute a script *within* qmail upon successful delivery of the email
without otherwise impacting the email delivery.
Can this be done?
H
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:40:46PM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> Ok, so everybody on this list is going to be faced with the suid perl issue
> when they upgrade to perl 5.8.0. What is qmail-scanner going to do to fix
> this because obviously right now it's not going to work without some fixes.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:45:52PM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> Ok, I think I've found the problem. The qmail-scanner-queue.pl runs as
> qscand... supposedly, but I've found that when the sweep gets called it's
> running as qmailq and therefore cannot read the temp files created by the
> qsca
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:41:47AM -0400, Dan Didier wrote:
> Is it possible to use multiple AV scanners with qmail-scanner without
> causing problems?
>
Absolutely no problem! In fact, I'd recommend it :-)
I'm surprised that wasn't obvious - but now I think about it, I see that
fact isn't actua
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:45:18AM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> Is there any way I can get qmail-scanner to only
> send me virus notifications via email if the headers
> of the quarantined virus contain a certain regular
> expression?
>
> For instance, I'd LOVE to be notified a
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 08:36, Matt wrote:
> What can I do about /var/spool/qmailscan?
>
> There seem to be aLOT of directories like:
>
> servername29384792834
>
> I know those are suppost to be working file scans... but some of them go
> back to Feburary 7th... why are these stuck here?
Ch
I dont have any being blocked at all. and my database has updated without a problem.
Look at the log file:
SelfCheck: Database modification detected. Forcing reload.
Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav
Database correctly reloaded (9643 viruses)
SelfCheck: Database status OK.
SelfChec
Tom Predmore said:
> I am having an issue with Q-S passing the user qscand to SA. I have read
> all docs that I could find on this issue and triple check all configs, I
> think.
>
> This is the output from SA. It shows it uses the qscand user all the
> time for user-pref lookups.
>
> Sep 23 23:29:0
Mine is being wierd.. when I check logs there are definately blockages!
Like hundreds of them.. yet some with 0 sizes (that's fine), but also
some with actual sizes slip through.. is it possible the virus has a bug
and isn't reproducing itself correctly?
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 15:54, Jeff Bilder w
What can I do about /var/spool/qmailscan?
There seem to be aLOT of directories like:
servername29384792834
I know those are suppost to be working file scans... but some of them go back to
Feburary 7th... why are these stuck here?
---
This s
I am having an issue with Q-S passing the user qscand to SA. I have read
all docs that I could find on this issue and triple check all configs, I
think.
This is the output from SA. It shows it uses the qscand user all the
time for user-pref lookups.
Sep 23 23:29:09 mail2 spamd[13132]: debug: retr
15 matches
Mail list logo
