[Qmail-scanner-general]question about commercial AV licensing

2002-05-12 Thread Lu
I have a very general question to ask qmail-scanner users. Most of these commercial AV outfits sell license PER DOMAIN on a mail server that may contain hundreds of domains. Using qmail-scanner to invoke the AV executables for every e-mail that comes in, technically one could just use a single

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-12 Thread Jason Haar
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 05:31:50PM -0700, chris wrote: > Right, I DO want to use it. I just didn't want to have to create multiple > instances of supervise for each one.. I guess I was hoping supervise could > observe one "run" that contained multiple TCPSERVER and if any of them died, > it woul

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-12 Thread chris
> > well, you just got rid of the reason why you where using daemontools in > the first place... if you don't want daemontools, don't use it. Right, I DO want to use it. I just didn't want to have to create multiple instances of supervise for each one.. I guess I was hoping supervise could obse

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]QS not invoked

2002-05-12 Thread Jason Haar
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:36:19PM -0400, Steven Faguy wrote: > I've been looking at archives for the list for about 4 months but haven't > found anything to help here. You don't mention that you even installed Qmail-Scanner correctly. Did you "./configure ..." or did you install manually? I'm su

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]klez

2002-05-12 Thread Nicholas Chua
In the qmail-scanner-queue.pl i have got the below as follow:-   # ./configure --spooldir /var/spool/qmailscan --qmaildir /var/qmail --bindir /var/qmail/bin --qmail-queue-binary /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue --admin root --domain --notify sender,admin,recips --local-domains a.net,b.com,c.org --

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-12 Thread Thilo Bangert
On Sunday 12 May 2002 03:18, chris wrote: > Yep, that works, sort of. It appears that the second instance (as in > the example) isn't controllable via SVC -d /service/qmail-smtpd > anymore. SVC -u /service/qmail-smtpd DOES cause the two instances to > start up (by using the & detach correctly)