qmail Digest 19 Nov 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1188
Topics (messages 52436 through 52466):
qmail-smtp slow!
52436 by: Gan
52437 by: Angel Krustev
52439 by: Gan
52440 by: Stanislav Grozev
52441 by: Philippe Lagente
52442 by: Gan
52443 by: Ga
hello friends
is it possible to insert custom footer at the end of every mail sent
through my MTA which obviously is qmail-1.03 ,its possible with sendmail
which we were running previously so , now my boss wants this feature , but
i dont know how to implement , i am ready to recompile
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:00:02AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>is it possible to insert custom footer at the end of every mail sent
> through my MTA which obviously is qmail-1.03 ,its possible with sendmail
> which we were running previously so , now my boss wants this feature , but
>
How can I see the incoming IPs of my pop3 clients?
Thanks!
--
Stefan Laudat
http://www.pepsicola.ro/~stefan
---
Love is the triumph of imagination over intelligence.
-- H. L. Mencken
Hi all,
As my machine running qmail is named senfpott.gysar (a bogus name, used only
in our local network), it should masquerade any outgoing mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now - as explained in the faq - I put
gymnasium-sarstedt.de into control/defaulthost. It worked - until I
configured serialmail.
On 15 Nov 2000, Chris K. Young wrote:
> I say that dist.html should be considered authoritative. There are
> references in the qmail and djbdns documentation that contain the
> URL to their respective pages.
But there are ABSOLUTELY no references to dist.html or softwarelaw.html in
the source ta
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Software security _is_ easy.
> The correct paradigms have been published for decades.
And ignored by most people for decades. :)
> Had you actually read the Schneier, you would know that no testing in
> the world can prove the security of a system
jon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to sound like a total newbie, but, I guess I am at qmail! If I have
> an email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I want to collect mail from this. I
> need a .qmail called jon.qmail with /var/spool/mail/jon in it.
Nope, you need a .qmail file with /var/spool/mail/jon in
And the problem persists? Isn't /usr/lib/libresolv.so a broken symlink? Check it
out please.
David Benfell wrote:
> Thanks Jose, but...
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 09:40:42PM +, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
> >
> > The make process fails to find the named (literally) functions. The functions
> >
Hi,
problems regarding with SUSE 7.0 are not known to me.
What may be the case is whether you have IPv6 support enabled or not.
Disable it.
cheers.
eh.
At 15:46 19.11.2000 +, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
>And the problem persists? Isn't /usr/lib/libresolv.so a broken symlink?
Check it
>out p
Thus said "Michael T. Babcock" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:41:20 EST:
> > OSI == "Open Source Initiative" I believe ...
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> That's funny, I always thought that OSI was the _Open Systems
> Interconnection_ internet model proposed by the ISO.
Thus said Raul Miller on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:33:30 EST:
> Or do you have similar problems deciding whether ATM means automated
> teller machine or asychronous transfer mode? Or deciding whether
> ASP means active server pages or application service provider? Or ...
Not generally, however, I mu
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:46:59PM +, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
>
> And the problem persists? Isn't /usr/lib/libresolv.so a broken symlink? Check it
> out please.
>
Assuming I'm following the links correctly:
benfell:/usr/local/src # ls -al /usr/lib/libresolv.so /lib/libresolv.so.2
-rwxr-xr-
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
>
> problems regarding with SUSE 7.0 are not known to me.
> What may be the case is whether you have IPv6 support enabled or not.
>
> Disable it.
>
You might be on to something. I grabbed a .config file from somebody
else. Sure
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > problems regarding with SUSE 7.0 are not known to me.
> > What may be the case is whether you have IPv6 support enabled or not.
> >
> > Disable it.
> >
> You
If you setup qmail with tcpserver, accustamp, and cyclelog, as per the
HOWTOs, you should be getting logging of qmail-pop3d connections in
/var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Laudat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 7:36 AM
To: [EMAI
Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well
as_ port 25?
Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25.
--
Phil Barnett mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW http://
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote:
>
> Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well
> as_ port 25?
>
> Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25.
Sure. Just tell tcpserver to listen on ano
On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well
> > as_ port 25?
> >
> > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> > are blocking outbound traffic
Phil Barnett wrote:
> Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well
> as_ port 25?
>
> Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25.
>
As easy as to stick tcpserver on a port (ports) other than the u
Phil Barnett wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as well
> > > as_ port 25?
> > >
> > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their provide
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:15:49PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> > >
> > > problems regarding with SUSE 7.0 are not known to me.
> > > What may be the case is wh
man, the problems is doubtless from the forementioned lib.
doubt someone has been messing with your ld path but try
[root@morgoth /root]# ldconfig -v | grep libresolv
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once
libresolv.so.2 -> libresolv-2.1.92.so
[root@morgoth /root]# ldconfig -v |
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:56:10PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> Indeed. [Sigh...] Still no joy. Any other ideas?
>
> The symptoms at "make setup check" remain:
>
> ./load qmail-remote control.o constmap.o timeoutread.o \
> timeoutwrite.o timeoutconn.o tcpto.o now.o dns.o ip.o \
> ipalloc.o i
On 19 Nov 2000, at 21:51, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
> Phil Barnett wrote:
>
> > On 19 Nov 2000, at 16:32, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Phil Barnett wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there a simple way to have SMTP listen on another port _as
> > > > well as_ port 25?
> > > >
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jose AP Celestino wrote:
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -P -H -R -u 64011 -g 101 0 smtp
^^
> /usr/local/bin/tcpcontrol /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
a propos tcpserver with smtp - on Solaris, where zero '0' bef
Hello
I will say about my experience with ORBS (as network administrator)
because the peoples associated with qmail have given good recommendation
to
use and base on ORBS as good anti-spam method.
I let to be another opinion!
After crush of one of Polish Cardiac Society's Server placed in Lod
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:53:51PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:56:10PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > Indeed. [Sigh...] Still no joy. Any other ideas?
> >
> > The symptoms at "make setup check" remain:
> >
> > ./load qmail-remote control.o constmap.o timeoutrea
With the attachment this time...
Thanks!
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:40:01PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:53:51PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:56:10PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > > Indeed. [Sigh...] Still no joy. Any other id
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:40:01PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> Ooo... I can't rule this out at all, mainly because I don't know
> enough.
>
> I built glibc 2.2 from source.
Uh, bad idea. Is there any reason you can't get a 2.2 SuSE RPM? Is there
any reason you particularly need 2.2?
> It
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:35:20AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> I will say about my experience with ORBS (as network administrator)
> because the peoples associated with qmail have given good recommendation
> to
> use and base on ORBS as good anti-spam method.
>
> I let to be another opin
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Alex Pennace wrote:
> The story I got so far is ORBS tested your machine and found it to be
> an open relay. You fixed it and ORBS tested you again. Meanwhile there
> were isolated connection attempts from Romania and a system crash you
> haven't firmly correlated to anything
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:53:31PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> X-Operating-System: Linux
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:40:01PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > Ooo... I can't rule this out at all, mainly because I don't know
> > enough.
> >
> > I built glibc 2.2 from source.
>
> Uh, bad idea.
"Pavel Kankovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But there are ABSOLUTELY no references to dist.html or softwarelaw.html in
> the source tarballs.
So what?
> Moreover, softwarelaw.html is about using the software ``once you've
> legally downloaded [it]'', dist.html is about (re)distribution of qm
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:47:39PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > Is there any reason you can't get a 2.2 SuSE RPM?
>
> Hmmm... They have an update to shlibs, which I think includes glibc.
> They also have a few other updates that look relevant. In particular,
> they have nssv1.
>
> So I ins
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 09:05:04PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> : I don't know which of these theories will succeed in court. I also
> : don't think you should have to care. So I promise I won't sue you
> : for copyright violation for downloading documents from my server.
>
> which makes it clear
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 09:20:42PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:47:39PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > > Is there any reason you can't get a 2.2 SuSE RPM?
> >
> > Hmmm... They have an update to shlibs, which I think includes glibc.
> > They also have a few other u
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 02:14:57AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> The hackers read ORBS data base called by its "insecure hosts"
> and apply to break hosts direclty from list!
ORBS only lists hosts that are open mail relays. ORBS doesn't list
hosts that are not open relays but have other vuln
on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25.
I'm having the same problem, so far with EarthLink. Have you encountered any
other ISPs that do this? If there
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote:
> on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> > are blocking outbound traffic destined for port 25.
>
> I'm having the same problem, so fa
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 11:00:42PM -0500, -dsr- wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote:
> > on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
> > > are blocking outbound traf
on 11/19/00 11:00 PM, -dsr- at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Amitai Schlair wrote:
>> on 11/19/00 4:23 PM, Phil Barnett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Several of my pop before smtp users have found that their providers
>>> are blocking outbound traffic
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:16:07PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> > I serioulsy suggest that you downgrade to your OS's latest supported glibc,
> > unless there is a specific reason you need a later one. Building glibc from
> > source is not for amateurs.
> >
> I think I've done just that:
>
>
Hi all...
Anyone know why I'm getting this error
?
Dennis
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 04:39:04PM +1100, Dennis wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Anyone know why I'm getting this error ?
My guess would be, that qmail-local is unable to chdir to your Maildir.
That's just a guess though.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes,
h
on 11/20/00 12:39 AM, Dennis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone know why I'm getting this error ?
Does the user have a maildir? (In the right place?) Is it owned and writable
by him? Can he traverse parent directories? What do the logs say?
- Amitai
Mate Wierdl wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 06:03:31PM +0800, eric yu wrote:
> > /service/qmail-send/log/run
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > SETUIDGID=/usr/local/bin/setuidgid # directory for setuidgid
> > MULTILOG=/usr/local/bin/multilog# directory for multilog
> > PROG=smtpd
> > LOGDIR=/var
Hello
> ORBS only lists hosts that are open mail relays. ORBS doesn't list
> hosts that are not open relays but have other vulnerabilities.
>
> ORBS is not a list of hosts with insecure telnet daemons.
>
> ORBS is not a list of hosts with insecure ftp daemons.
It not difficult to spuppose, tha
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 07:08:55AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> > Send mail to ORBS and try to resolve this with them.
>
> ORBS has ignored all letters and will not stop scanning
> of my host
Hello, this list is for discussion of qmail, if you wish to discuss orbs
please take this to SPAM-
Hi there,
I just started using qmail 1.03 a week ago, and made some interesting
discovery. I had the following .qmail file:
| preline formail -I "Bcc: `some/script`" | qmail-inject
Obviously, this causes a loop since qmail-inject will try to deliver to
the Bcc: addresses as well as to the origi
50 matches
Mail list logo
