On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:40:01PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
> Ooo... I can't rule this out at all, mainly because I don't know
> enough.
>
> I built glibc 2.2 from source.
Uh, bad idea. Is there any reason you can't get a 2.2 SuSE RPM? Is there
any reason you particularly need 2.2?
> It looks like SuSE 7.0 comes with
> 2.1.3 (judging from rpm -qa | grep libc).
The libresolv's you listed before were 2.1.92 if I remember correctly. That
means you have libc6 2.1.92 installed somewhere as well. Until you get this
mess straightened out, you're probably not going to be able to compile much
of anything.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes,
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA | connected to a bunch of other wires."
38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A | Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_
7:50pm up 162 days, 18:06, 12 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00
