Hi list,
lately, while building QGIS with any sip related change, some of the
triggered `sip-build` processes take too long to complete (two of them take
10 minutes, one takes 15' and one takes 25' roughly)
Is this normal or is it some quirk on my setup? (Debian testing, sip 6.7.7)
Thanks,
Stefano
Thanks for the feedback!
Apparently, I had both sip 4.19.25 and sip-tools 6.7.7 installed which was
possibly causing the slowness.
I brought build times back to normal by doing the following:
- remove all sip-tools 6.7.7 related packages
- install the missing sip-dev package
- delete the SIP_BUIL
Hi Hannes
This looks like an XY problem case!
If your actual goal is to:
> Any pointers on how to properly update a new feature's attribute fields,
> that exist on a layer but are not shown the user with the QGIS' widgets
> in the attribute form?
then you simply need to set a Default Value for t
Hi Nyall,
How about a 'Not a bug' one instead? 'Solution proposed' kind of implies a
way to avoid a valid bug.
Stefanos
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Uns
Hi Richard,
This is intentional. The actual enum and docstrings are quite explicit,
however I can't think of the use case for NeverAskSkip:
```
AlwaysAsk, //!< Always ask users to select from available sublayers, if
sublayers are present
AskExcludingRasterBands, //!< Ask users to select from a
Hi Abdelghani,
You should be able to achieve that by setting the project's terrain:
```
p=QgsRasterDemTerrainProvider()
p.setLayer(dem_layer)
QgsProject.instance().elevationProperties().setTerrainProvider(p)
```
This should get your dem_layer as a terrain for any new 3d views.
I don't think the AP
Hi Abdelghani,
You need to create a symbol, set its data defined properties, assign it to
a 3d renderer and then assign the 3d renderer to the layer:
```
s = QgsPolygon3DSymbol()
p = QgsProperty()
p.setField('field_containing_height')
c = QgsPropertyCollection()
c.setProperty(QgsPolygon3DSymbol.P
Hi Abdelghani,
> I've tried to manually export the scene but the results is a bit
disappointing:
This looks like a bug on the exporting code. Have you checked the issue
tracker?
> Also I've seen that in the python API documentation it is mentioned that
Qgs3DMapScene is not available. Which mean
Hi list!
I have just filed a QEP for our upcoming work regarding building a STAC
client in QGIS core.
To anyone interested, please feel free to comment or open discussion on the
following QEP issue:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/300
Best
Stefanos
_
> It takes 25 minutes from scratch on my Ryzen 7 1700 with 8 physical cores
and 32 GB RAM.
Is this indeed for a debug build with all default cmake options (with
tests, python bindings, 3d etc) and no ccache?
Stefanos
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGI
Thank you Marco,
and thank you to those taking the time to vote; participating in commons is
an important part of the QGIS community.
I have a question regarding the ballot, though:
The new QGIS website says Germán is already a voting member as a
representative of the Colombian user group.
Is the
Congratulations to all new voting members!
It's great to see Damiano involved in QGIS again!
Stefanos
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://l
Hi Marco, lists
While I trust German and the Colombian user group's democratic procedures
for delivering a vote to their representative, I deeply believe that having
the same person as both a country voting member and a community voting
member is a step in the wrong direction.
It defeats the purpo
For the record, Hugo resigned on the 22nd while the ballot was open for
another 2 days until the 24th, though.
Shouldn't the ballot be closed as unnecessary on the 22nd and all nominees
be accepted?
Best
Stefanos
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 13:38, Marco Bernasocchi via Qgis-voting-members <
qgis-voting
Hi Marco,
That's great!
I'd love to join too.
Best
Stefanos
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 22:12, Marco Bernasocchi via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Dear QGIS Developers,
>
> We’d like to start a focused effort on refactoring and improving the QGIS
> Attribute Table. Over t
> seems good now? Do you have a pointer to a failing workflow?
> I fixed an invalid regex in prepare_commit 2 days ago, so hopefully
> everything is ok now.
Seems fixed indeed :)
> you must choose with or without apparently in clang-format
Apparently, the online configurator you linked stops at
I also don't like the commit bot.
I've already had to force push, which I don't like to as it usually
disturbs reviewing, because it committed a change even though pre-commit
was ran locally!
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/59790/commits/4fc5d7011b8dbb234850f7147b69825d275f6f66
Stefanos
On Thu,
Thank you Denis for all this work and the heads up for setting things up!
I have a few notes/questions about things I've encountered so far:
1. There are cases where the formatting is not applied. For example in PR
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/59382, after merging master and pushing,
clang-f
Hi Hernan,
Nlohmann json got updated to 3.11.3 in
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61597 a few days ago, maybe you could try
building master before that?
Best
Stefanos
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, 10:04 AM Hernán De Angelis via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I seek
Hi Denis
The core STAC support was a two-part implementation, one in 3.38 and one in
3.40.
We just wanted to avoid the stable API limitation while there was work in
progress.
I believe there's no reason to keep it like this any more :)
Best
Stefanos
On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 17:19, Denis Rouzaud
gt;>
>>
>>
>> Old QGIS would only save the old, new QGIS would save both and use the
>> new if it exists.
>>
>> Best of the 2 worlds?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Denis
>>
>>
>>
>> Le jeu. 12 juin 2025 à 13:55, Stefanos Na
Hi list
During the last dev cycle, a change was introduced in the way that
properties are stored in the .qgs xml file
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/60855
While this solved a real issue (data-driven properties could result in an
invalid property name with a leading digit) in an elegant way and
Wrong link and qep number!
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025, 4:43 PM Jean Felder via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We propose to improve annotation items support to add support for moving,
> copy and rotation.
>
> Seehttps://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/pull/3
23 matches
Mail list logo
