[Qemu-devel] [RFC] i.MX233 / olinuxino support

2012-12-11 Thread M P
I've added imx23 support to qemu, with quite a lot of working peripherals, and enough to boot linux with SD card and USB working. There are bits missing (audio, video outputs) but it's otherwise working pretty well. I've collated and cleaned the patches onto this github branch, I'd appreciate any

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] i.MX233 / olinuxino support

2012-12-11 Thread M P
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 December 2012 13:08, M P wrote: > > I've added imx23 support to qemu, with quite a lot of working > peripherals, > > and enough to boot linux with SD card and USB working. There are bits > > missing (a

[Qemu-devel] ehci and low/full speed peripherals

2012-12-13 Thread M P
In the i.MX23 emulation, there is a EHCI sysbus device which is supported and seems to work well already (using -usbdevice host:...) However most of the other peripherals (serial, hub, net) fail do to a 'speed mismatch' error. I looked into a bit more details, and it seems the EHCI has to be compl

Re: [Qemu-devel] ehci and low/full speed peripherals

2012-12-13 Thread M P
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 12/13/12 11:38, M P wrote: > > In the i.MX23 emulation, there is a EHCI sysbus device which is supported > > and seems to work well already (using -usbdevice host:...) > > > > However most of the other pe

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] i.MX233 / olinuxino support

2012-12-24 Thread M P
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 December 2012 15:08, M P wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Peter Maydell > > > wrote: > >> "Showing 11 changed files with 2,236 additions and 0 deletions." > >> > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] emulated ARM performance vs real processor ?

2011-09-02 Thread M P
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Julien Heyman wrote: > Thanks Dave. > I use system emulation, and my main concern is "just" to know that the > actual board will run faster than the emulation. So based on your example, > and even though my target board (mini2440) is nowhere as fast as a Panda > boa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] mxs/imx23: Implements the pin mux, GPIOs

2014-01-08 Thread M P
All noted, and thanks for all the bits you reviewed so far, I'll do the changes and resubmit. M On 6 January 2014 15:52, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet wrote: > > Implements the pinctrl and GPIO block for the imx23 > > It handles GPIO output, and GPIO input f

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] mxs/imx23: Add digctl driver

2014-01-08 Thread M P
On 6 January 2014 15:46, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet wrote: > > This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow > > linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet > > --- > > hw/arm/Makefile.objs

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ds18s20: Add onewire thermal sensor

2013-12-11 Thread M P
Support for a dallas/maxim onewire sensor, enough of it to fool linux's w1-gpio driver Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet --- hw/misc/Makefile.objs | 2 + hw/misc/w1-ds18s20.c | 332 ++ 2 files changed, 334 insertions(+) create mode 100644 hw/misc/w1

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ds18s20: Add onewire thermal sensor

2013-12-11 Thread M P
I've just posted the imx233 patch series, with a board that uses this driver. M On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 December 2013 12:22, M P wrote: > > > > Support for a dallas/maxim onewire sensor, enough of it to > > fool linux'

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Freescale mxs/imx23 + Olimex Olinuxino support

2013-12-13 Thread M P
Can someone give me a pointer on how the review (if any) is done for these patches? I have to say I'm rather amazed at the rate of submission on the mailing list, and I worried to see these patches buried further and further down in such a short timescale :-) Michael On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:5

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Freescale mxs/imx23 + Olimex Olinuxino support

2013-12-13 Thread M P
: > On 13 December 2013 12:53, M P wrote: > > Can someone give me a pointer on how the review (if any) is done for > these > > patches? I have to say I'm rather amazed at the rate of submission on the > > mailing list, and I worried to see these patches buried further and

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU forks survey

2010-12-21 Thread M P
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Since Christmas and the New Year with its good intensions are approaching, > apart from z80 there's some more feature forks around: > > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/forks?o=age > > - hpoussin.git ppc contains the 40p machine that I'm reviewi