Thanks Peter, very helpful -- and err, sorry to land you more work than you already had :-)
Would I contribute anything by also reviewing and/or testing the sus mentioned patches? I can at least test the A10 and raspi if this helps... M On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>wrote: > On 13 December 2013 12:53, M P <buser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can someone give me a pointer on how the review (if any) is done for > these > > patches? I have to say I'm rather amazed at the rate of submission on the > > mailing list, and I worried to see these patches buried further and > further > > down in such a short timescale :-) > > The rough process is: > * people reply to your email with review comments; when you've > accumulated enough you send out a fixed set of patches for > further review > * if nobody replies at all within say 2 weeks you can send out > a 'ping' followup to this coverletter to bring the set back > to peoples' attention > > http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch is where we try > to describe how the process works. > > In this particular case, I have tagged your mail in my mail > client as 'must-review'; however since my review queue is > currently pretty full (you're one of four new ARM board/soc > support patchsets, the others being Allwinner A10, Canon DIGIC > and RaspberryPi; then there's the TrustZone support patchset > and all the 64 bit support work) I'm afraid I can't currently > promise a particularly rapid turnaround time. > > If you can find the mail threads relating to the other > recent board/soc support patchsets I listed above and > look through review comments to see if any of them would > apply to your board that would probably help. > > thanks > -- PMM >
