Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Kemari for KVM v0.1

2010-04-22 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/22/2010 01:35 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Dor Laor wrote: On 04/21/2010 08:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Hi all, We have been implementing the prototype of Kemari for KVM, and we're sending this message to share what we have now and TODO lists. Hopefully, we would like to get

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Kemari for KVM v0.1

2010-04-22 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/22/2010 04:16 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: 2010/4/22 Dor Laor: On 04/22/2010 01:35 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Dor Laor wrote: On 04/21/2010 08:57 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Hi all, We have been implementing the prototype of Kemari for KVM, and we're sending this message to share

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Kemari for KVM v0.1

2010-04-25 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/23/2010 10:36 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: On 04/23/2010 02:17 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Dor Laor wrote: [...] Second, even if it wasn't the case, the tsc delta and kvmclock are synchronized as part of the VM state so there is no use of trapping it in the middle. I s

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Apr 27

2010-04-27 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/27/2010 11:14 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 04/27/2010 01:36 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: A few comments: 1) The problem was not block watermark itself but generating a notification on the watermark threshold. It's a heuristic and should be implemented based on polling block stats. Polling fo

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Apr 27

2010-04-27 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/27/2010 11:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 04/27/2010 11:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: Here's another option: an nbd-like protocol that remotes all BlockDriver operations except read and write over a unix domain socket. The open operation returns an fd (SCM_RIGHTS strikes again) that is use

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Apr 27

2010-04-27 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/27/2010 12:22 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 04/27/2010 12:08 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/27/2010 11:56 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 04/27/2010 11:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: Here's another option: an nbd-like protocol that remotes all BlockDriver operations except read and write over a unix d

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself

2010-05-05 Thread Dor Laor
On 05/05/2010 11:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand what's going on from the outside, this information must be exposed. For example, host can reduce the numb

[Qemu-devel] Re: Live migration protocol, device features, ABIs and other beasts

2009-11-24 Thread Dor Laor
On 11/23/2009 02:15 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: Dor Laor wrote: > In the last couple of days we discovered some issues regarding stable > ABI and the robustness of the live migration protocol. Let's just jump > right into it, ordered by complexity: > > 1. Control*every*

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Live migration protocol, device features, ABIs and other beasts

2009-11-24 Thread Dor Laor
On 11/23/2009 08:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: Eduardo Habkost wrote: That may be good enough for upstream Qemu, but IMO for RHEL it is not a realistic policy. If the definition of "guest visible state" is buggy on the current implementation, we can't drop entirely the possibility of fixing it o

Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open

2009-12-11 Thread Dor Laor
On 12/12/2009 12:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 11.12.2009, at 22:13, Izik Eidus wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:46:55 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: Izik Eidus wrote: I personaly dont like mjpeg, and yes in the end of the day you can add the video streaming into vnc, but what is the point he

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Spice project is now open

2009-12-12 Thread Dor Laor
On 12/12/2009 07:40 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: If Spice can crash a guest, that indicates to me that Spice is maintaining guest visible state. That is difficult architecturally because if we want to do something like introduce a secure sandbox for running guest visible emulation, libspice would

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Spice project is now open

2009-12-12 Thread Dor Laor
On 12/12/2009 09:48 PM, Izik Eidus wrote: On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:26:30 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: Izik Eidus wrote: On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:40:21 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: FWIW, I don't see any reason why Spice couldn't be made to be separate from guest emulation. I think it would ju

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2009-12-21 Thread Dor Laor
On 12/21/2009 09:43 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:59:43AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: Gleb Natapov wrote: Windows is a mystery box, so we can speculate as much as we want about it. If you don't like something just say "it may break Windows" :) Losing activation does sound

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2009-12-22 Thread Dor Laor
On 12/22/2009 12:51 AM, john cooper wrote: Dor Laor wrote: Qemu will check the required cpuid of the cpu model on the host and refuse to load otherwise. When moving to this model, migration can be simplified too since there are fewer combination, and one can choose performance over migration

[Qemu-devel] Fw: [PATCH v3 02/12] Add PV MSR to enable asynchronous page faults delivery.

2010-01-06 Thread Dor Laor
What's missing in this patch set and in similar pvclock implementation is userspace activation of the features. This should be part of the machine description and not enabled by default without no control to deactivate it on a per guest basis. Gerd, since you're the qdev master, what's the best

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-06 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/06/2010 04:32 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: We can probably default -enable-kvm to -cpu host, as long as we explain very carefully that if users wish to preserve cpu features across upgrades, they can't depend on the default. Hardware upgrades or

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/06/2010 05:16 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 01/06/2010 08:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:32 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: We can probably default -enable-kvm to -cpu host, as long as we explain very carefully that if users wish to

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 10:18 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 10:03 AM, Dor Laor wrote: We can debate about the exact name/model to represent the Nehalem family, I don't have an issue with that and actually Intel and Amd should define it. AMD and Intel already defined their names (in cat

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 10:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:03:28AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote: On 01/06/2010 05:16 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 01/06/2010 08:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:32 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: We

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 11:24 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 11:11 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 01/07/2010 10:18 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 10:03 AM, Dor Laor wrote: We can debate about the exact name/model to represent the Nehalem family, I don't have an issue with that and actually Inte

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 01:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 01/07/2010 03:40 AM, Dor Laor wrote: There's no simple solution except to restrict features to what was available on the first processors. What's not simple about the above 4 options? What's a better alternative (that insures u

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 01:59 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 11:40 AM, Dor Laor wrote: There's no such thing as Nehalem. Intel were ok with it. Again, you can name is corei7 or xeon34234234234, I don't care, the principle remains the same. There are several processors belonging to t

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 02:00 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 01:44 PM, Dor Laor wrote: So if you had a 2.6.18 kernel and a 2.6.33 kernel, it may be necessary to say: (2.6.33) qemu -cpu Nehalem,-syscall (2.6.18) qemu -cpu Nehalem Or let qemu do it automatically for you. qemu on 2.6.33 doesn&#

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm

2010-01-07 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/07/2010 03:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 01/07/2010 06:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/07/2010 02:33 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: There's another option. Make cpuid information part of live migration protocol, and then support something like -cpu Xeon-3550. We would remember the exact c

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] performance improvement for windows guests, running on top of virtio block device

2010-01-11 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/11/2010 11:03 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 01/11/2010 10:30 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/11/2010 09:40 AM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote: The following patch allows us to improve Windows virtio block driver performance on small size requests. Additionally, it leads to reducing of cpu usage on write IOs

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-08 Thread Dor Laor
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 01:30 +, Paul Brook wrote: > > -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick & hi-res timers, to > > allow the desired timer resolution. USB 2.0 microframe is 125usec. > It still works even without accurate timing demands. Only isochronous mode will have problems an

[Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] e1000 emulation code

2008-01-10 Thread Dor Laor
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 23:08 -0500, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Dor Laor wrote: > > Some figures: Linux rx 350Mbps, tx 150bps, Windows rx 700mbps, tx 100 mbps. > > very nice! > > in a related note, the VMWare tools package, which is

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000 emulation code

2008-01-10 Thread Dor Laor
andrzej zaborowski wrote: Hi, On 09/01/2008, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It which supports TCP/UDP and IP transmit checksum, as well as TSO. It has been tested with Linux (2.6.18|22|23|24)++ and Windows XP (using the driver supplied at the intel download site). Windows

Re: [Qemu-devel] emulate the Intel-VT behavior on any type of CPU

2008-01-20 Thread Dor Laor
Alexey, you're wrong again. svm is supported. On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:59 +0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > Note however, that as far as I know, all the Qemu accelerators - KQemu > and KVM do not support this. >

Re: [Qemu-devel] emulate the Intel-VT behavior on any type of CPU

2008-01-20 Thread Dor Laor
Opps, me wrong this time, it should have been private. Didn't notice the reply address is different. Sorry. On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:21 +0200, Dor Laor wrote: > Alexey, you're wrong again. > > > svm is supported. > > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:59 +0200, Alexey Erem

Re: [Qemu-devel] PCI device emulation in qemu

2008-01-29 Thread Dor Laor
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 13:43 -0800, Sarah A Sharp wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm developing a USB host controller driver for hardware that isn't > available yet. Is there a way to emulate a PCI host controller for > the Linux host controller driver to talk to? I looked at the USB > emulation sectio

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change the e1000 mmio addr space according to spec

2008-02-28 Thread Dor Laor
repository: /home/build/src/kvm branch: trunk commit cd5edbab7d647b81cbbf60d530068f2916658753 Author: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu Feb 28 11:01:41 2008 +0200 Change the e1000 mmio addr space according to spec. According to the Intel 82540EM manual, the mmio sp

Re: [Qemu-devel] High CPU Usage with Linux 2.6.24 and Windows XP Guest (but not with 2.6.23)

2008-03-08 Thread Dor Laor
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 01:14 +, Steve Fosdick wrote: > > kqemu works correctly, whereas with: > > CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y > > the problem appears. Any idea why that causes a problem? Is it a > bug? > > Anyway, at least for now I have a solution. Thanks for your help. While I don't know

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix sci irq set when acpi timer about to wrap

2008-03-12 Thread Dor Laor
>From 498f162fc9d9fb897c756273c481101a44a220de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:11:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix sci irq set when acpi timer about to wrap. The acpi timer should generate sci irq when enabled and when bit 23 of the time

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] virtio-console: Add support for multiple ports for generic guest-host communication

2009-10-20 Thread Dor Laor
On 10/20/2009 09:13 AM, Amit Shah wrote: Hello, This patch series fixes a few problems since the last send, mainly in the save/restore code and a few bugs shown by the automated test suite (located in a separate git repo, link below). The automated test suite and a standalone interactive test p

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] KVM Fault Tolerance: Kemari for KVM

2009-11-12 Thread Dor Laor
On 11/09/2009 05:53 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: Hi all, It has been a while coming, but we have finally started work on Kemari's port to KVM. For those not familiar with it, Kemari provides the basic building block to create a virtualization-based fault tolerant machine: a virtual machi

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] KVM Fault Tolerance: Kemari for KVM

2009-11-15 Thread Dor Laor
On 11/13/2009 01:48 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: Hi, Thanks for your comments! Dor Laor wrote: On 11/09/2009 05:53 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: Hi all, It has been a while coming, but we have finally started work on Kemari's port to KVM. For those not familiar with it, Kemari pro

[Qemu-devel] Live migration protocol, device features, ABIs and other beasts

2009-11-22 Thread Dor Laor
In the last couple of days we discovered some issues regarding stable ABI and the robustness of the live migration protocol. Let's just jump right into it, ordered by complexity: 1. Control *every* feature exposed to the guest by qemu cmdline: While thinking on cross version migration, and

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: virtio: Add memory statistics reporting to the balloon driver (V3)

2009-11-23 Thread Dor Laor
On 11/23/2009 11:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: Rusty and Anthony, If I've addressed all outstanding issues, please consider this patch for inclusion. Thanks. Changes since V2: - Increase stat field size to 64 bits - Report all

RE: [Qemu-devel] QEMU/PCI shutdown event

2007-05-28 Thread Dor Laor
>hi everyone! >i'm programming a pci-device that includes some threads & >socket-connections (that allow remote debugging of my device). > >however, i want to cleanly shutdown all threads and sockets when qemu >exits... is there an easy way of getting informed of a qemu shutdown? > >(something simi

RE: [Qemu-devel] qemu + Windows NT (2000, XP, etc)

2007-06-07 Thread Dor Laor
>QEMU developers: > >I have been using QEMU off and on for some time. Recently I had a need >for a Windows XP VM to be joined to a domain. I discovered a rather >annoying issue in the form of the key-grab: NT-based Microsoft >operating systems make heavy use of Ctrl-Alt-Delete, i.e. to sign on, >

RE: [Qemu-devel] QEMU on windows timing problems

2007-06-21 Thread Dor Laor
>Hello. > >I have a problem with time drifting inside the QEMU machine (running >XP SP2). This is more visible as the load inside the VM increases >(heavy hard-disk activity, almost 100% CPU usage). However, I need to >control some actions inside the VM machine which depend on time. Any >idea how

RE: [Qemu-devel] /dev/rtc issues

2007-08-11 Thread Dor Laor
>Like others have reported to the list I'm getting: > >Could not configure '/dev/rtc' to have a 1024 Hz timer. This is not a >fatal >error, but for better emulation accuracy either use a 2.6 host Linux >kernel or >type 'echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq' as root. It's might be HPET that

[Qemu-devel] RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Dynamic ticks

2007-08-15 Thread Dor Laor
>> I like it ;) I have some comments (and a reworked patch at the end): >> > >And thanks a lot for that. > >> >> Plus, in this way you change the behaviour from "always try RTC under >> Linux" to "don't use RTC is dynticks is enabled". >> Is this what you really want? > >I don't know whether this i

[Qemu-devel] RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2

2007-08-18 Thread Dor Laor
>> Hello, >> in reply to this mail I will send a serie of 4 patches that cleans up >and >> expands the alarm timer handling in QEMU. Patches have been rebased on >QEMU >> CVS. >> >> Patch 1 is mostly a cleanup of the existing code; instead of having >multiple >> #ifdefs to handle different timers s

[Qemu-devel] RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure -take2

2007-08-19 Thread Dor Laor
>I think this is a really nice and important patch set. Just a couple >things: > >On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 00:02 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> > In this case the dyn-tick minimum res will be 1msec. I believe it >should >> > work ok since this is the case without any dyn-tick. >> >> Actually mini

RE: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2

2007-08-19 Thread Dor Laor
>>> Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually >impacts >>> something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile if >it >>> introduces extra complexity. >>> >> >> >> If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the >first >> place? >> > >Accurac

RE: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarmtimer infrastrucure - take2

2007-08-19 Thread Dor Laor
>Paul Brook wrote: >> > Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually >impacts >> > something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile >if it >> > introduces extra complexity. >> >> If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the >first >> place

RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Share Vmware communication port betweendevices

2007-08-21 Thread Dor Laor
>> Hi, >> >> Some more information about the VMware backdoor can be found at: >> http://chitchat.at.infoseek.co.jp/vmware/backdoor.html > >Are there interesting apps that make use of this? I really don't like >the idea of supporting this PV protocol if we're not going to get >interesting apps out

[Qemu-devel] RE: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2

2007-08-22 Thread Dor Laor
>> > >>> This is QEMU, with dynticks and HPET: >> > >>> >> > >>> % time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall >> > >>> -- --- --- - - - >--- >> > >>> 52.100.002966 0 96840 clock_gettime >> > >>> 19.500.001110

Re: [Qemu-devel] vmmouse with Fedora-6 64bit guest

2007-09-25 Thread Dor Laor
Dan Kenigsberg wrote: Frustrated with evtouch, I wanted to try vmmouse's absolute mode, supported by Liguori's patch http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/16083 . My guest has vmmouse_drv.so, and I configured its xorg.conf to load it. However, for some reason I get (EE) VMWARE(0): vm

Re: [Qemu-devel] qcow2 vs. image file format --> pci device

2007-09-29 Thread Dor Laor
Clemens Kolbitsch wrote: hi everyone! i have a strange problem (at least to me it seems strange :-) ): i have implemented a pci device (Network IC) and it works just fine when using a standard image. however i now want to support snapshotting... i started to convert my image into the qcow2 f

Re: [Qemu-devel] qcow2 vs. image file format --> pci device

2007-10-01 Thread Dor Laor
Clemens Kolbitsch wrote: Clemens Kolbitsch wrote: hi everyone! i have a strange problem (at least to me it seems strange :-) ): i have implemented a pci device (Network IC) and it works just fine when using a standard image. however i now want to support snapshotting... i started to conv

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU/MIPS & dyntick kernel

2007-10-15 Thread Dor Laor
Paul Brook wrote: There seem to have specific problems when using dynticks in Qemu. What I can see is that it makes the PowerPC emulation quite unusable, at least on my PC, which is an amd64 (with a fix CPU frequency), no matter if I run 32 or 64 bits mode. I'd expect to see the same probl

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] USB OHCI isochronous transfers support

2007-10-22 Thread Dor Laor
Arnon Gilboa wrote: Hi, The attached patch adds isochronous transfers support to the OHCI emulation, similarly to the UHCI patch pushed two weeks ago. In order to use ohci instead of uhci, replace the following line in pc.c: usb_uhci_piix3_init(pci_bus, piix3_devfn + 2); With: usb_ohci_init_p

[Qemu-devel] Add ioport statistics

2007-10-23 Thread Dor Laor
production problems. Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- qemu/exec.c |3 --- qemu/vl.c | 58 ++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu/exec.c b/qemu/exec.c index 3e588d5..974ac98 100644

[Qemu-devel] [Patch][Fix win2k install] Add delay between dma issue & result.

2007-11-07 Thread Dor Laor
sing asyncio. This fix adds a delay of 1msec once every 8 dma writes. Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> btw: It also applies against qemu cvs head. diff --git a/qemu/hw/ide.c b/qemu/hw/ide.c index 329d053..da972c8 100644 --- a/qemu/hw/ide.c +++ b/qemu/hw/ide.c @@ -36

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] KVM userspace: Add PCI device passthrough support

2007-11-08 Thread Dor Laor
Fabrice Bellard wrote: Hi, Some remarks: - rename the option to -pcidevice. - Remove the directory passthrough and put the file directly in hw/. Rename the file to something more explicit such as pci_passthrough* - Suppress the files passthrough.h and neo_pci_tree.h - pt_init should be call

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio support for QEMU

2007-12-04 Thread Dor Laor
Anthony Liguori wrote: This patch series adds support for paravirtual device drivers that use virtio. virtio is a frame work in Linux for abstracting the details of virtual IO so that a single device driver (like networking) can be used with multiple hypervisors using a small shim layer. Curre

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio infrastructure

2007-12-04 Thread Dor Laor
Anthony Liguori wrote: Subject: [PATCH 1/3] virtio infrastructure Cc: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch implements the ba

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device

2007-12-04 Thread Dor Laor
Anthony Liguori wrote: Index: qemu/hw/virtio-net.c === --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ qemu/hw/virtio-net.c2007-12-04 14:17:37.0 -0600 + +static void virtio_net_receive(void *opaque, const uin

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio block device

2007-12-04 Thread Dor Laor
Anthony Liguori wrote: Subject: [PATCH 3/3] virtio block device + +static void virtio_blk_handle_output(VirtIODevice *vdev, VirtQueue *vq) +{ +VirtIOBlock *s = to_virtio_blk(vdev); +VirtQueueElement elem; +unsigned int count; + +while ((count = virtqueue_pop(vq, &elem)) != 0) { +

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Dbus support - a proposal management API

2007-12-11 Thread Dor Laor
Laurent Vivier wrote: Le mardi 11 décembre 2007 à 10:10 +0100, Fabrice Bellard a écrit : Hi, Hi, At this point I am not interested in integrating it into QEMU as it is one more API level to maintain in addition to the command line monitor. However, I can change my mind if several

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Dbus support - a proposal management API

2007-12-11 Thread Dor Laor
Anthony Liguori wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> Or have 2 monitor interaction modes. One mode uses the command line >>> style >>> suitable for people / scripting languages. The other umode ses a >>> binary XDR >>> protocol for serializin

RE: [Qemu-devel] Linux Kernel to Include KVM Virtualization

2006-12-12 Thread Dor Laor
Hi, My name is Dor and I'm one of the contributors for the KVM. > Ricardo Almeida wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just saw this on slashdot > > (http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/12/0135240). From the > > news: > > > > "In a fashion comparable to that of Xen a modified QEMU is used for > > th

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Upgrade the apic version_id

2007-01-25 Thread Dor Laor
to be deleted. Regards, Dor Laor. apic_saved_version_id.patch Description: apic_saved_version_id.patch ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

<    1   2