Solaris can be a bit tricky since it supports 32 and 64-bit
applications. Oracle Solaris 11 disabled 32-bit "boot" but
still supports 32-bit applications.
Are the rest of the libraries in the generated Makefile 32-bit or
64-bit? On Solaris, it's fairly easy to tell since the 64-bit libraries
are
I picked up a omap2430 prototype board, and am looking to start
working with this. Since this is a foray back into development for
me, I'm a little overwhelmed by the amount of information I'm trying
to digest in starting this project (and the user forum at qemu-forum.ipi.fi
being down is a bit de
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.04.2014 09:32, schrieb Sai Prajeeth:
> > I am booting an OpenIndiana image on qemu by using the -smp 4 option. I
> > seem to be running into this known
> > bug http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/820-5245/ggmsj/index.html
> >
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Check whether sdl-config is available before calling it, otherwise
> ./configure triggers a warning:
> ./configure: 957: sdl-config: not found
>
> If neither the .pc file not sdl-config are present, disable SDL support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lo
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:56 PM, jonatan perry wrote:
> Hi Mulyadi!
> Regarding my first qeustion: no, I don't want remote access to the machine,
> I want local access, something like starting a linux os, and launch from
> shell qemu so he will run a graphic operation system, like windows.
>
> I w
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Izik Eidus wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:57:48 -0600
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Yaniv Kamay wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Spice project is now open, for more information visit
>> > http://spice-space.org, due to a server relocation the site will be
>> > down duri
Pablo Virolainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Nestor wrote:
> > It seems qemu-forum.ipi.fi is down. Is there an alternate place one
> > can obtain source snapshots or browse the user forums?
> >
> It should be back online once again (and it has been almost all the
> time). The reaso
"Andreas Färber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following part of configure is triggered on a fully-updated
> Solaris 10 8/07 amd64:
>
> #
> # Solaris specific configure tool chain decisions
> #
> if test "$solaris" = "yes" ; then
>#
># gcc for solaris 10/fcs in /usr/sf
Juergen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following part of configure is triggered on a fully-updated
> > Solaris 10 8/07 amd64:
> >
> > #
> > # Solaris specific configure tool chain decisions
> > #
> > if test "$solaris" = "yes" ; t
Solaris has boolean_t defined, so this #ifndef allows hw/e1000.c
to compile on Solaris.
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/hw/e1000.c2008-02-02 21:20:18.0 -0500
+++ qemu/hw/e1000.c 2008-02-04 10:39:33.097052000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
#include "net.h"
#define __iomem
+#ifndef __sun__
type
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x
> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:58:28 +0100
>
> >
> > Am 05.02.2008 um 12:30 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> >
> > > I don't believe that 10.0.2.0/24 was c
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that there is a corner case where the local host has a
> > 10.0.2.x or 10.0.x.x address which would cause a qemu guest problems
> > that has a 10.0.2.
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:53:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Content-Description: message body text
> > bdrv_flush is declared to return void, but this is wrong because it
> > means that the implementations have nowhere to report their erro
Andrew Warkentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sergey Bychkov wrote:
>
> > - Original Message - From: "Ralf Baerwaldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: 19.02.2008 18:09
> > Subject: [Qemu-devel] precompiled qemu-system-x86_64 is 32 bit instead
> > of 64bit
> >
> >
> >> I downl
k for the code I have is at
http://svn9.cvsdude.com/kdesolaris/kqemu/trunk/1.0.3pre11
If anyone wants to test it out the code in there, and there's a
patch I'm missing, let me know.
Thanks,
Ben Taylor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
>
> Which part of "gcc 4.x is not supported" didn't you understand?
>
> Paul
>
>
> Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly if gcc4 is found even
if disable-gcc-check is enabl
Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to commit the attached FDC and M48T59 device save and reset
> methods. After this change, all Sparc32 devices can be saved.
>
> Any comments?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/msg00435.html
Other than the comment
This is an update to a previous patch to fix the missing macro isinf
(and isnan) for Solaris that is used in target-i386/helper.c. This
patch is against qemu/fpu/softfloat-native.h, which is a better place
for the macro, as opposed to putting it in target-i386/helper.c.
Attribution to Juergen
a patch like this was posted about 6 weeks ago. the
only difference I can see between this and the
previous patch is the location of the inserted
function.
take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/msg00123.html
for hints. This patch fixed the Solaris/express insta
Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who does minimal install. In this case, texi2html would not
> be available on the system. I've seen quite a few systems without
> texi2html.
>
> Again, the patch is not a MUST, but it's nice not to see unnecessary warning.
I suppose you cou
I've recrafted my patch for supporting OpenSound System on Solaris by
checking for it automatically, instead of providing an option. Also added
a status flag on whether OSS is enabled or not.
Ben--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-05-09 10:06:06.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-05-12 13:30:31.29
This set of patches allows 64-bit Solaris 10/11 X86 to compile qemu in a 64bit
environment. It requires a 64-bit libsdl, but has been tested with all the
tests
(sparc, arm, mips, mipsel, linux-i386, and DamnSmallLinux)
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/Makefile.target 2007-05-16 07:59:39.0 -0400
+++ q
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
consistent failure with my existing ubuntu-7.04 32-bit guest on Solaris 10/x86
32-bit
host. The last time I tested the CVS code would
Hi Julia,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:10:02AM -0400, Ben Taylor wrote:
> >
> > I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
> > updated
> > tonight after the big round of patches that have be
Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
> > > attached patch fixes the problem?
> >
This is short configure patch which saves the output of the libsdl test comile
output
for a file which can be reviewed after configure runs. This allows for easier
debugging
of why the libSDL test failed.
Ben--- qemu/configure.ORIG 2007-06-14 13:58:26.144281000 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-06-
There are two patches included in the mail
1) qemu-sdl-error.diff - patch to capture output from the sdl compile test, and
output it if there
is an error at reporting time (and delete the file when finished)
2) qemu-sdl-whitespace.diff - patch to fix the indentation for the sdl-config
se
Alexey Eremenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Host: Fedora 7, 64-bit, Qemu 0.9, AMD Opteron.
If you are using Qemu 0.9, not CVS, there are several bugs
that have been fixed in the CVS code which fixed Solaris installs
in QEMU.
> Guest: Solaris 10 (32-bit, 2005 release) aborts install in th
Alexey Eremenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some news about Solaris on Qemu:
>
> My Solaris is v2005, x86-64 + x86 on the same DVD. I installed the
> x86-64 version.
Ugh. don't bother with that version. Download S10 U3 (11/06) or S10 U4
(07/07) [if it's been released yet]
> Host: Fedora
"Jorge Lucángeli Obes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been giving some thought to Anthony's idea:
>
> http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Specs/StoringCommandLineInImage
>
> However, maybe I'm just too much on vacations, but I don't seem to
> come up with a nice way of doing this. Everythin
By default, uname -i returns i86pc on i386 or x86_64 system. This patch makes
it possible to for Solaris systems to get the right hardware type.
--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-08-24 21:37:51.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 08:53:34.288345000 -0400
@@ -155,6 +155,12 @@
insta
just cleaning up some annoying " " at the end of some lines
--- qemu/configure.ORIG 2007-09-15 08:58:23.283818000 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 08:58:34.878425000 -0400
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
oss="no"
fi
-# Check for gcc4, error if pre-gcc4
+# Check for gcc4, error if pre-gcc4
if
Corrected version of the patch.
--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-08-24 21:37:51.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 09:07:47.928893000 -0400
@@ -155,6 +155,12 @@
install="ginstall"
needs_libsunmath="no"
solarisrev=`uname -r | cut -f2 -d.`
+# have to select again, bec
Compiling the latest CVS code, I found that a function in vl.c uses a define
called ULONG_LONG_MAX. The value is defined in solaris's sys/types.h,
but only on _LP64 builds, so 32-bit builds won't pickup if I redefine it as
ULONG_MAX.
I'm looking for comments on this patch.
--- qemu.ORIG/vl.h
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef __sun__
> > +/* Have to define this for Solaris as ULONG_LONG_MAX is not defined
> > + anywhere. ULONG_MAX is correct only on _LP64 sy
"J. Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:14 +0200, Luca wrote:
> > On 9/17/07, Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 17.09.2007 um 14:18 schrieb Christian MICHON:
> > >
> > > > On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> DON'T
Included are two small patches for configure and Makefile.target to
allow QEMU to configure and build correctly on a Solaris x86-64 platform.
Ben--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-09-29 21:58:31.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-10-04 12:52:30.776801000 -0400
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@
#undef main
Atoosaah S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I enable debugging?
>
> I checked the configure file and I do not see any options for compiling with
> debugging, i.e. there is no --enable-debug option. I see that the "default
> parameters" section of the configure file sets: gdbstub="yes" bu
Solaris doesn't have the timegm function, so I found a replacement and
wedge it into cutils.c.
I found the supplement for timegm in the opensync repository at:
http://www.opensync.org/changeset/1769
--- qemu.ORIG/cutils.c 2007-09-16 17:07:49.0 -0400
+++ qemu/cutils.c 2007-11-09 14
Enclosed is an updated set of patches for configure, Makefile and
Makefile.target.
the configure and Makefile.target fixes are for compiling qemu on Solaris x86-64
the Makefile patch is for qemu-img when it compiles it on a system
that does not have gnutls in a standard place.
Questions?
Ben-
I'm getting this error compiling hw/sh7750.c
I believe the problem comes from the include in hw/sh_intc.h
with the macro
#define _INTC_ARRAY(a) a, sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)
in line 587 of hw/7750.c, I see
sh_intc_register_sources(&s->intc,
_INTC_ARRAY(vector
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to get networking to work with ME/98 as guest ?
>
> No network device shows up in this case as in XP which works fine.
>
> Command I use;
> qemu -hda Win98.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user
maybe because you have to d
I have a couple of win98se guests that I keep around for testing and upgrade
tests and the like.
The current CVS code has no problem booting these images, but the first
time I do anything (like read the cdrom, or change directories in windows
explorer), the guest just hangs. This seems like a re
Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a couple of win98se guests that I keep around for testing and upgrade
> tests and the like.
>
> The current CVS code has no problem booting these images, but the first
> time I do anything (like read the cdrom,
After some testing, I've made a minor fix to the Rev 1.66 patch of hw/ide.c.
With this patch, and the current CVS tree, I'm once again able to see the
devices after clicking on "MyComputer" in my Win98SE guest.
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/hw/ide.c 2007-11-08 11:38:17.0 -0500
+++ qemu/hw/ide.c
Vegard Nossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I experience the following problem: Setting the trap flag (TF) of the
> EFLAGS register correctly calls the debug exception DE. However, the
> DR6 register does not have the single step (BS) flag set.
I remember this getting submitted. wh
The first patch (solaris-force32bit.diff) is a patch to allow an x86-64 Solaris
host
to compile a 32-bit version of qemu. This works because Solaris x86-64 can run
both 64-bit and 32-bit binaries.
The second patch is just a README for building on Solaris with a status of
the tools and libraries
Robert Nestor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems qemu-forum.ipi.fi is down. Is there an alternate place one
> can obtain source snapshots or browse the user forums?
I mentioned something to Pablo, and he said he could see it
from where he was, but he suspected there's some DNS problem
"Sven Köhler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i just booted a recent knoppix-cd (4.0.2) and i'm trying to enable DMA,
> > but it won't work!
> >
> > I started qemu with that command:
> >
> > qemu -m 256 -cdrom knoppix.iso -boot d
> >
> > But inside knoppix, a "hdparm -d1 /dev/hdc" won't wo
Enclosed is a set of patches that allows qemu-0.8.1-cvs to be compiled on
Solaris 10
Sparc systems and run x86 software (tested DamnSmallLinux and Win98SE). I will
be following up with a second patch which corrects the bgr colors that
Solaris/Sparc
natviely displays, but am keeping it separat
Enclosed is a patch that fixes the color mapping when running qemu on a
Solaris/Sparc
system. To enable the color mapping bgr, call qemu with the flag "-bgr".
This patch *requires* the qemu-0.8.1cvs-sparc-solaris.patch diff that was posted
earlier today.
I separated out this patch as there has
Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to stop the release of incomplete BGR patches, I am
> implementing a more complete patch. I am just adding depth = 32 with BGR
> instead of RGB. If other pixel formats are wanted, you should signal it now.
I added an "int bgr;" to the
Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to stop the release of incomplete BGR patches, I am
> implementing a more complete patch. I am just adding depth = 32 with BGR
> instead of RGB. If other pixel formats are wanted, you should signal it now.
Fabrice - nice job. The patc
Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:06:20AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Ben Taylor wrote:
> > >I'm seeing quite a few bugs on Qemu 0.8.1 with the vnc feature
> > >
> > >1) Sparc based system co
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to compile the qemu-cvs code with Taylor's
> patches applied. I did not see a qemu executable? Is it
> the same as qemu/aprc-softmmu/qemu-system-sparc? When
> I try to use it it keeps complaining that it can't
> load::
>
> /usr/local/sh
Troy Benjegerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Much better.
>
> I did have one bogon after running xvncview on a big-endian host,
> closing it, then starting it on a little-endian host that resulted in
> this from realvnc:
>
> Rect too big: 24832x33024 at 8448,16640 exceeds 640x480
> main:
This patch is to allow the onboard samba configuration in qemu to correctly
start
the samba server on Solaris (It's in a different location than a normal linux
system).
Bendiff -ruN qemu-orig/vl.c qemu/vl.c
--- qemu-orig/vl.c 2006-05-03 18:02:44.0 -0400
+++ qemu/vl.c 2006-05-12 20:48:32
Just regressed the solaris/sparc patches for qemu 0.8.1 CVS and found that
everything works fine with the new PCI, VGA and VNC patches.
Bendiff -ruN qemu-orig/Makefile qemu/Makefile
--- qemu-orig/Makefile 2006-05-14 08:07:53.0 -0400
+++ qemu/Makefile 2006-05-14 22:30:59.0 -0400
@@
Kazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:55 PM Christian MICHON wrote:
>
> >how can we do the same if the host is winXP ?
>
> >Today, on linux guests, 2.4.x kernel boot faster than 2.6.x kernel
> >inside qemu (unless using "clock=pit" on 2.6.x). 2 days ago,
> >when I tried
This patch was created by Juergen Kiel, so to be clear I did not make this
patch.
I did however, test it, with the current CVS code, and this patch to the ACPI
tables does allow a floppy drive to be seen by a Solaris 10/X86 guest.
Prior to this time, changes in Solaris 10 do not correctly enumera
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Enclosed is the latest version of the qemu solaris/sparc patch, applied
> > against yesterday's CVS (post BGR update).
>
> I'm happy to say that this patch
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any one has had success with this combination?
Haven't tried it yet.
>
> Also, anyone running any x86 version of Solaris
> under qemu? I would like a copy of the disk-image
> if possible.
Depending on the version of Solaris x86 you want to run,
t
The question came up a little while back about getting Solaris (Sparc) to boot
in qemu
under qemu-system-sparc.
I did a little work yesterday to find out that the boot process in hw/sun4m.c
is really
kind of hard wired for a linux boot. If there is no kernel or initrd, it
drops right through
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 14:16, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > The question came up a little while back about getting Solaris (Sparc) to
> > boot in qemu under qemu-system-sparc.
> >
> > I did a little work yesterday to find ou
Fabrice or Paul:
Can we get this added? This patch has been posted to the list 4 or 5 times
in various incarnations in the last year or soj. I posted a long message with
the logs from the compile on why the current code is wrong, and why this patch
fixes
it. The basic problem is that code u
Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Using the latest cvs sources on x86 SuSE 10.0 host, Win2K guest,
> the 1152x864 mode offered to me by Windows doesn't work. Instead
> I just get moved to 640x480, it looks like. The modes on either
> side of it - 1024x768 and 1280x1024 work fin
Christian MICHON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no
>
> the error message from vista is explicit: no acpi, no boot.
>
> On 6/9/06, Sylvain Petreolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- "Nigel J. Terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > Yes you do need ACPI to get the .iso to boot. I
Paul Jakma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > (ITU), such as the DiskUpdate on tools.de/solaris/itu/DU.zip which
> > has a modifed RTL8029 driver that works with Qemu on SolarisX86.
> > Obviosly, if you boot a
Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I missed a lot of the functions, this version should be complete.
> I see no difference in operation with or without the patch. Comments?
Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a requirement
for a previous patch you
"S.P.T.Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first post to this list.
Welcome.
> I have been using qemu for the last several versions. Works great, in
> fact I just booted off a Vista beta 2 yesterday from a linux host.
>
> My query is whether Qemu either now or in t
Alessandro Corradi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is my question:
> If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as
> another architetture as ppc or mips right?
> So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something
> change deepl
Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
> > > purposes.
> >
> >This s reminds me of Java.
>
> Except that Java VM is not suitable target for all classes of programming
> languages, like C.
I wondered if you could
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>
> I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
> ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
> is fine
> but make always generates binaries that want to find
> /usr/local/lib/
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>
> I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
> ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
> is fine
> but make always generates binaries that want to find
> /usr/local/lib/
Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> >As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
> >binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
> >
> >
> >
>
> My answer had been a
Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
> >>
> >>I do not have write permission to /usr/loca
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
> > Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> >
> >>
> > Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
> > (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
> > (should go under /usr/local/lib/a
"K. Richard Pixley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 October 2006 2:42 pm, Chuck Brazie wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any work going on now to add config file support?
> >>
> >> Chuck Brazie
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> > As a random end-user, I really
Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
here's a real short patch to support Samba working on a Solaris Host.
--- qemu-ORIG/vl.c 2006-12-22 12:29:05.0 -0500
+++ qemu/vl.c 2006-12-22 14:22:17.338815000 -0500
@@ -3069,8 +3069,13 @@
fclose(f);
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > > Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
> > > here's a real sho
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > > Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
> > > here's a real sho
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > > Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
> > > here's a real sho
Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:40:27PM -0500, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > -snprintf(smb_cmdline, sizeof(smb_cmdline), "/usr/sbin/smbd -s %s",
> > - smb_conf);
> > +snprintf(sm
Fabrice,
Quick question about this patch (August 19, 2006)
The ENOMEDIUM variable is dummy'd up for Windows in vl.h.
I found that Solaris doesn't have an ENOMEDIUM variable, and I've
been able to get block.c to compile correctly by adding this to vl.h.
Before I go submitting anything, I just w
This is a patch to make block-raw.c compile correctly on Solaris.
I successfully created a raw image file after the patch was applied.
Ben
diff -ruN qemu-122806/block-raw.c qemu/block-raw.c
--- qemu-122806/block-raw.c 2006-12-22 09:19:53.0 -0500
+++ qemu/block-raw.c 2006-12-28 15:46:31.
This patch allows for the opensolaris kqemu module to be activated under
a Solaris Express (11) host running qemu.
The solaris kqemu module is located at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads/kqemu-osol-1.3.0pre9-v0.2.tar.gz
diff -ruN qemu-base/configure qemu/configure
--- qemu
Anyone think that the monitor help screen ought to implement some kind of paging
(think more) or something? I did a help, and half of the help is off the
screen before
I can figure out what I'm looking for (and apparently what I'm looking for is
already
scrolled off).
THoughts?
Ben
__
got patches?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
This patch was created by Martin Bochnig ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and is for qemu compiling on sparc to work on arm, mips,
and sparc binaries, dealing with the sparc register allocation
issues.
diff -ruN qemu-ORIG/target-arm/exec.h qemu/target-arm/exec.h
--- qemu-ORIG/target-arm/exec.h 2005-11-26 05
This patch (by Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED]) fixes a register
allocation issue on Solaris.
Some supporting evidence and the original patch were posted at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=22392&tstart=0
diff -ruN qemu-ORIG/dyngen-exec.h qemu/dyngen-exec.h
--- qemu-ORIG/dy
This patch coded by Martin Bochnig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) adds
support for a couple of Sparc V9 operations.
diff -ruN qemu-ORIG/dyngen.c qemu/dyngen.c
--- qemu-ORIG/dyngen.c 2006-12-21 11:49:27.0 -0500
+++ qemu/dyngen.c 2007-02-02 15:06:56.019613000 -0500
@@ -2349,6 +2349,33 @@
This patch fixes the link phase for qemu-img (to get the aio
support included).
Ben
diff -ruN qemu-ORIG/Makefile qemu/Makefile
--- qemu-ORIG/Makefile 2007-02-05 16:22:42.0 -0500
+++ qemu/Makefile 2007-02-08 14:01:37.092547000 -0500
@@ -26,11 +26,9 @@
ifndef CONFIG_DARWIN
ifndef CONFIG
"Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:48:51 +
> Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've very little sympathy (read: none) for people who "accidentally"
> > break things by running them as root.
>
> On a related note, I've been running qemu(-system
This patch consolodates Solaris configuration (it had
been in two places) , as well as adds support for Solaris 10
for the kqemu module.
diff -ruN qemu-ORIG/configure qemu/configure
--- qemu-ORIG/configure 2007-01-31 07:10:07.0 -0500
+++ qemu/configure 2007-02-10 07:01:39.149388000 -0500
Sittichai Palansong
** with guidance from the tap code he wrote in qemu/vl.c
**
** Modified by: Ben Taylor
** Updated: 02/09/2007
**
** Author: Sittichai Palanisong
** Updated: 05/20/2005
**
** You are expected to be able to write a shell script wrapper to invoke
** qemu with
Attribution for the TAP patch goes to Sittichai Palanisong
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).The qemu_tap.c is a derivitive
work of a previous version called qemu_tun.c, and the scripts
are also by Sittichai with derivations by me.
Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch
This patch against current CVS is an update of the previously posted Solaris
TAP patch. This small change fixes a large performance problem with
inbound packets (scp, ftp). The author found that some packets were
concatenated, which was the reason for the poor performance. This patch
fixes th
Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
> opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be built but not sure if
> it can work correctly.
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/
The current 0.9.0 CVS
Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/12/07, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on S
I was wondering about the possibility of expanding the amount of "vram"
for the Cirrus Logic GDM5446 emulation. 8MB of ram would give the
ability to do 1600x1200 24 bit color. I know, this would probably completely
break windows and other drivers, but am wondeirng if the Cirrus Xorg
driver could
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
